From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C1FC33CA2 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:59:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DFCB2082E for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:59:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="CHmQI7e4" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727873AbgAJL7i (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jan 2020 06:59:38 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:45620 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727735AbgAJL7i (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jan 2020 06:59:38 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=tCI6kPFo3kZR0h8MlulTn8D7YLgba1IxclwFXAy8oZw=; b=CHmQI7e4PzBL7c9JdN3I9LFWB vUK6QWDimw0P+EmHpNG2Ov3mHJmxctyxw9xpoE7PXVbUy+GMYG2ejHDvahtPLYGX2+mM2PA8GSlL1 G5GTYJ+5GVpDcYLp2eCoIslass7mw5wajIMoc7hw6YpSPhHjGekLyI8Of9YUpouRoEgNMKgUl4MpM Vjj7oUDXBtdcsqb0qGXLbIeMRE2CGYNiB7623NWE3BpmKld+Ap+6GS7KbjO0Nm8OQMZCuDwSrHEvP UA/+akMiJ5lYLLzx8UcjuRiwgPlPhQ1n7/Twe0W9m0a7gJHmpRKqLPBZRFzdZ4iX9Z7LlRjIFmDIK RtV7ZTCFw==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ipsx0-0003xI-89; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:59:38 +0000 Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 03:59:38 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] xfs: make struct xfs_buf_log_format have a consistent size Message-ID: <20200110115938.GG19577@infradead.org> References: <157859548029.164065.5207227581806532577.stgit@magnolia> <157859551417.164065.16772455171549647070.stgit@magnolia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <157859551417.164065.16772455171549647070.stgit@magnolia> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 10:45:14AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > From: Darrick J. Wong > > Increase XFS_BLF_DATAMAP_SIZE by 1 to fill in the implied padding at the > end of struct xfs_buf_log_format. This makes the size consistent so > that we can check it in xfs_ondisk.h, and will be needed once we start > logging attribute values. Isn't this an incompatible change in the on-disk format for 32-bit systems?