From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C061FC33CB3 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:21:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986D224671 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:21:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="LuNXNDCr" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726550AbgAOQVy (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 11:21:54 -0500 Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:59438 "EHLO userp2120.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726132AbgAOQVy (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 11:21:54 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 00FG3MVh171324; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:21:34 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=corp-2019-08-05; bh=L9krt3OnZbLw/Qn92cS3R/uyp35gwKBo/4V2E49xxJA=; b=LuNXNDCrgQlGsXyROwBg8D8XcpTTRsOZp8rVpVcS7LAvJNXoU8emCsSzt8fe/5/LULEf riPC67cJS2Oujg4VLAFK+v66R0DRGx5dQfb3JvIxxj0yajKWkLs8pnvP7GNp98Y18oEt HKLE+KTBEmCwgSFRATWnRmKMUcC3McT2UMiAe3g6OvZ3/B78I0CRoLaYhWNbSp49StBt K+s2J9Oc4pajtpUsD8QAIPFRN5ppU0qicTkdrK5B/AqfED4JwPijD9vdVVTF4MT17alS 0144jNyIXDKenem+V7RQ+TfpbCCx1Ip8l62vnfXu/gTQk8kBzB8c+LNewRAU0y4JIyVE Sg== Received: from aserp3020.oracle.com (aserp3020.oracle.com [141.146.126.70]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2xf73yn4nf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:21:34 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 00FG3fGF057179; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:21:33 GMT Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236]) by aserp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2xj1apnrqs-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:21:33 +0000 Received: from abhmp0003.oracle.com (abhmp0003.oracle.com [141.146.116.9]) by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 00FGLRQ9030627; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:21:27 GMT Received: from localhost (/67.169.218.210) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 08:21:27 -0800 Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 08:21:26 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jan Tulak , Baihua Lu , fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: xfs/191 failures? Message-ID: <20200115162126.GY8247@magnolia> References: <20200115150802.GA425@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200115150802.GA425@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9501 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=851 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1911140001 definitions=main-2001150127 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9501 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=903 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1911140001 definitions=main-2001150127 Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 07:08:02AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi Jan and Baihua, > > the xfs/191 test case has been failing for me basically since it > was added. Does it succeed for anyone with an upstream kernel > and xfsprogs? It never succeeds here. --D > Here is my diff between the golden and the actual > output: > --- /root/xfstests/tests/xfs/191-input-validation.out 2016-09-21 20:34:14.961574921 +0000 > +++ /root/xfstests/results//xfs/191-input-validation.out.bad 2020-01-15 15:05:25.580935340 +0000 > @@ -1,2 +1,13 @@ > QA output created by 191-input-validation > silence is golden > +pass -n size=2b /dev/vdc > +pass -d agsize=8192b /dev/vdc > +pass -d agsize=65536s /dev/vdc > +pass -d su=0,sw=64 /dev/vdc > +pass -d su=4096s,sw=64 /dev/vdc > +pass -d su=4096b,sw=64 /dev/vdc > +pass -l su=10b /dev/vdc > +fail -n log=15 /dev/vdc > +fail -r rtdev=/mnt/test/191-input-validation.img /dev/vdc > +fail -r size=65536,rtdev=/mnt/test/191-input-validation.img /dev/vdc > +fail -i log=10 /dev/vdc