From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62DE6C34026 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 15:19:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD44207FD for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 15:19:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726735AbgBRPT3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 10:19:29 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:38696 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726666AbgBRPT3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 10:19:29 -0500 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 5524768BE1; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:19:27 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:19:27 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Dave Chinner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Allison Collins , "Darrick J . Wong" Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/31] xfs: remove the ATTR_INCOMPLETE flag Message-ID: <20200218151927.GA21275@lst.de> References: <20200217125957.263434-1-hch@lst.de> <20200217125957.263434-3-hch@lst.de> <20200217215124.GG10776@dread.disaster.area> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200217215124.GG10776@dread.disaster.area> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 08:51:24AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > if ((entry->flags & XFS_ATTR_INCOMPLETE) && > > - !(context->flags & ATTR_INCOMPLETE)) > > + !context->allow_incomplete) > > continue; /* skip incomplete entries */ > > While touching this code, can you fix the trailing comment here to > be a normal one before the if() statement, or remove it because it's > largely redundant? Yes, the comment is rather pointless so I'll remove it.