From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v5 PATCH 0/9] xfs: automatic relogging experiment
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 07:09:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200227150936.GL8045@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200227134321.7238-1-bfoster@redhat.com>
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 08:43:12AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's a v5 RFC of the automatic item relogging experiment. Firstly,
> note that this is still a POC and experimental code with various quirks.
Heh, funny, I was going to ask you if you might have time next week to
review the latest iteration of the btree bulk loading series so that I
could get closer to merging the rest of online repair and/or refactoring
offline repair. I'll take a closer look at this after I read through
everything else that came in overnight.
--D
> Some are documented in the code, others might not be (such as abusing
> the AIL lock, etc.). The primary purpose of this series is still to
> express and review a fundamental design. Based on discussion on the last
> version, there is specific focus towards addressing log reservation and
> pre-item locking deadlock vectors. While the code is still quite hacky,
> I believe this design addresses both of those fundamental issues.
> Further details on the design and approach are documented in the
> individual commit logs.
>
> In addition, the final few patches introduce buffer relogging capability
> and test infrastructure, which currently has no use case other than to
> demonstrate development flexibility and the ability to support arbitrary
> log items in the future, if ever desired. If this approach is taken
> forward, the current use cases are still centered around intent items
> such as the quotaoff use case and extent freeing use case defined by
> online repair of free space trees.
>
> On somewhat of a tangent, another intent oriented use case idea crossed
> my mind recently related to the long standing writeback stale data
> exposure problem (i.e. if we crash after a delalloc extent is converted
> but before writeback fully completes on the extent). The obvious
> approach of using unwritten extents has been rebuffed due to performance
> concerns over extent conversion. I wonder if we had the ability to log a
> "writeback pending" intent on some reasonable level of granularity (i.e.
> something between a block and extent), whether we could use that to
> allow log recovery to zero (or convert) such extents in the event of a
> crash. This is a whole separate design discussion, however, as it
> involves tracking outstanding writeback, etc. In this context it simply
> serves as a prospective use case for relogging, as such intents would
> otherwise risk similar log subsystem deadlocks as the quotaoff use case.
>
> Thoughts, reviews, flames appreciated.
>
> Brian
>
> rfcv5:
> - More fleshed out design to prevent log reservation deadlock and
> locking problems.
> - Split out core patches between pre-reservation management, relog item
> state management and relog mechanism.
> - Added experimental buffer relogging capability.
> rfcv4: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20191205175037.52529-1-bfoster@redhat.com/
> - AIL based approach.
> rfcv3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20191125185523.47556-1-bfoster@redhat.com/
> - CIL based approach.
> rfcv2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20191122181927.32870-1-bfoster@redhat.com/
> - Different approach based on workqueue and transaction rolling.
> rfc: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20191024172850.7698-1-bfoster@redhat.com/
>
> Brian Foster (9):
> xfs: set t_task at wait time instead of alloc time
> xfs: introduce ->tr_relog transaction
> xfs: automatic relogging reservation management
> xfs: automatic relogging item management
> xfs: automatic log item relog mechanism
> xfs: automatically relog the quotaoff start intent
> xfs: buffer relogging support prototype
> xfs: create an error tag for random relog reservation
> xfs: relog random buffers based on errortag
>
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_errortag.h | 4 +-
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_shared.h | 1 +
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c | 24 +++-
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.h | 1 +
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c | 5 +
> fs/xfs/xfs_dquot_item.c | 7 ++
> fs/xfs/xfs_error.c | 3 +
> fs/xfs/xfs_log.c | 2 +-
> fs/xfs/xfs_qm_syscalls.c | 12 +-
> fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h | 3 +
> fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c | 79 +++++++++++-
> fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h | 13 +-
> fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c | 216 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c | 35 ++++++
> fs/xfs/xfs_trans_priv.h | 6 +
> 15 files changed, 399 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.21.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-27 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-27 13:43 [RFC v5 PATCH 0/9] xfs: automatic relogging experiment Brian Foster
2020-02-27 13:43 ` [RFC v5 PATCH 1/9] xfs: set t_task at wait time instead of alloc time Brian Foster
2020-02-27 20:48 ` Allison Collins
2020-02-27 23:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-28 0:10 ` Dave Chinner
2020-02-28 13:46 ` Brian Foster
2020-02-27 13:43 ` [RFC v5 PATCH 2/9] xfs: introduce ->tr_relog transaction Brian Foster
2020-02-27 20:49 ` Allison Collins
2020-02-27 23:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-28 13:52 ` Brian Foster
2020-02-27 13:43 ` [RFC v5 PATCH 3/9] xfs: automatic relogging reservation management Brian Foster
2020-02-27 20:49 ` Allison Collins
2020-02-28 0:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-28 13:55 ` Brian Foster
2020-03-02 3:07 ` Dave Chinner
2020-03-02 18:06 ` Brian Foster
2020-03-02 23:25 ` Dave Chinner
2020-03-03 4:07 ` Dave Chinner
2020-03-03 15:12 ` Brian Foster
2020-03-03 21:47 ` Dave Chinner
2020-03-03 14:13 ` Brian Foster
2020-03-03 21:26 ` Dave Chinner
2020-03-04 14:03 ` Brian Foster
2020-02-27 13:43 ` [RFC v5 PATCH 4/9] xfs: automatic relogging item management Brian Foster
2020-02-27 21:18 ` Allison Collins
2020-03-02 5:58 ` Dave Chinner
2020-03-02 18:08 ` Brian Foster
2020-02-27 13:43 ` [RFC v5 PATCH 5/9] xfs: automatic log item relog mechanism Brian Foster
2020-02-27 22:54 ` Allison Collins
2020-02-28 0:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-28 14:02 ` Brian Foster
2020-03-02 7:32 ` Dave Chinner
2020-03-02 7:18 ` Dave Chinner
2020-03-02 18:52 ` Brian Foster
2020-03-03 0:06 ` Dave Chinner
2020-03-03 14:14 ` Brian Foster
2020-02-27 13:43 ` [RFC v5 PATCH 6/9] xfs: automatically relog the quotaoff start intent Brian Foster
2020-02-27 23:19 ` Allison Collins
2020-02-28 14:03 ` Brian Foster
2020-02-28 18:55 ` Allison Collins
2020-02-28 1:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-28 14:04 ` Brian Foster
2020-02-29 5:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-29 12:15 ` Brian Foster
2020-02-27 13:43 ` [RFC v5 PATCH 7/9] xfs: buffer relogging support prototype Brian Foster
2020-02-27 23:33 ` Allison Collins
2020-02-28 14:04 ` Brian Foster
2020-03-02 7:47 ` Dave Chinner
2020-03-02 19:00 ` Brian Foster
2020-03-03 0:09 ` Dave Chinner
2020-03-03 14:14 ` Brian Foster
2020-02-27 13:43 ` [RFC v5 PATCH 8/9] xfs: create an error tag for random relog reservation Brian Foster
2020-02-27 23:35 ` Allison Collins
2020-02-27 13:43 ` [RFC v5 PATCH 9/9] xfs: relog random buffers based on errortag Brian Foster
2020-02-27 23:48 ` Allison Collins
2020-02-28 14:06 ` Brian Foster
2020-02-27 15:09 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-02-27 15:18 ` [RFC v5 PATCH 0/9] xfs: automatic relogging experiment Brian Foster
2020-02-27 15:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200227150936.GL8045@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox