From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_admin: revert online label setting ability
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:10:23 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200302031023.GI10776@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3d7b7a5c-c1bf-1fc9-686e-707165181d07@sandeen.net>
On Sun, Mar 01, 2020 at 03:13:07PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 3/1/20 12:55 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 01, 2020 at 09:50:03AM -0800, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >> The changes to xfs_admin which allowed online label setting via
> >> ioctl had some unintended consequences in terms of changing command
> >> order and processing. It's going to be somewhat tricky to fix, so
> >> back it out for now.
> >
> > What are the symptoms and behaviour of these "unintended
> > consequences"? And why are they tricky to fix?
>
> Yeah, I should have probably said more in the commit log.
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206429
>
> was the first clue,
>
> "xfs_admin can't print both label and UUID for mounted filesystems"
>
> The main problem is that if /any/ options that trigger xfs_io get specified,
> they are the only ones that get run:
>
> # Try making the changes online, if supported
> if [ -n "$IO_OPTS" ] && mntpt="$(find_mntpt_for_arg "$1")"
> then
> eval xfs_io -x -p xfs_admin $IO_OPTS "$mntpt"
> test "$?" -eq 0 && exit 0
> fi
>
> and the non-io / db opts don't get run at all.
>
> So sure, we could then move on to the db commands, but we actually built them
> all up along the way as well:
>
> l) DB_OPTS=$DB_OPTS" -r -c label"
> IO_OPTS=$IO_OPTS" -r -c label"
> ;;
>
> so we'd need to keep those separate, and not re-run them in db.
>
> And another thing that I struggled with was preserving the order; you'd
> kind of expect that if you specify commands in a certain order
> they'd be executed in that order, and that used to be true. Now it's not,
> even if we don't exit in the "if IO_OPTS" case above.
>
> So I experimented with building up an array of commands, invoking xfs_db
> or xfs_io one command at a time as needed for each, and ... it just got worse
> and worse, TBH.
And there's your new commit message. :)
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-02 3:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-01 17:50 [PATCH] xfs_admin: revert online label setting ability Eric Sandeen
2020-03-01 20:55 ` Dave Chinner
2020-03-01 21:13 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-03-02 3:10 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2020-03-02 14:35 ` [PATCH V2] " Eric Sandeen
2020-03-03 1:18 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200302031023.GI10776@dread.disaster.area \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox