From: Pavel Reichl <preichl@redhat.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 3/4] xfs: xfs_isilocked() can only check a single lock type
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 22:03:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200320210317.1071747-4-preichl@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200320210317.1071747-1-preichl@redhat.com>
In its current form, xfs_isilocked() is only able to test one lock type
at a time - ilock, iolock, or mmap lock, but combinations are not
properly handled. The intent here is to check that both XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL
and XFS_ILOCK_EXCL are held, so test them each separately.
The commit ecfea3f0c8c6 ("xfs: split xfs_bmap_shift_extents") ORed the
flags together which was an error, so this patch reverts that part of
the change and check the locks independently.
Fixes: ecfea3f0c8c6 ("xfs: split xfs_bmap_shift_extents")
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Suggested-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Reichl <preichl@redhat.com>
---
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
index bc2be29193aa..c9dc94f114ed 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
@@ -5829,7 +5829,8 @@ xfs_bmap_collapse_extents(
if (XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp))
return -EIO;
- ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL | XFS_ILOCK_EXCL));
+ ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL));
+ ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL));
if (!(ifp->if_flags & XFS_IFEXTENTS)) {
error = xfs_iread_extents(tp, ip, whichfork);
@@ -5946,7 +5947,8 @@ xfs_bmap_insert_extents(
if (XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp))
return -EIO;
- ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL | XFS_ILOCK_EXCL));
+ ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL));
+ ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL));
if (!(ifp->if_flags & XFS_IFEXTENTS)) {
error = xfs_iread_extents(tp, ip, whichfork);
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-20 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-20 21:03 [PATCH v7 0/4] xfs: Remove wrappers for some semaphores Pavel Reichl
2020-03-20 21:03 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] xfs: Refactor xfs_isilocked() Pavel Reichl
2020-03-20 21:03 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] xfs: clean up whitespace in xfs_isilocked() calls Pavel Reichl
2020-03-20 21:03 ` Pavel Reichl [this message]
2020-03-20 21:03 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] xfs: replace mrlock_t with rw_semaphores Pavel Reichl
2020-03-23 3:28 ` [PATCH v7 0/4] xfs: Remove wrappers for some semaphores Darrick J. Wong
2020-03-23 9:22 ` Pavel Reichl
2020-03-23 16:33 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-03-23 16:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-23 21:59 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200320210317.1071747-4-preichl@redhat.com \
--to=preichl@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).