linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] xfs: remove the special COW fork handling in xfs_bmapi_read
Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 11:57:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200501155742.GQ40250@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200501081424.2598914-12-hch@lst.de>

On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 10:14:23AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> We don't call xfs_bmapi_read for the COW fork anymore, so remove the
> special casing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---

Seems fine, though I wonder if I we really need that DEBUG check just
for the alert message in the same branch. ISTM we could drop the ifdef
or the whole hunk..

Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>

>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 13 +------------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> index fda13cd7add0e..76be1a18e2442 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> @@ -3902,8 +3902,7 @@ xfs_bmapi_read(
>  	int			whichfork = xfs_bmapi_whichfork(flags);
>  
>  	ASSERT(*nmap >= 1);
> -	ASSERT(!(flags & ~(XFS_BMAPI_ATTRFORK|XFS_BMAPI_ENTIRE|
> -			   XFS_BMAPI_COWFORK)));
> +	ASSERT(!(flags & ~(XFS_BMAPI_ATTRFORK | XFS_BMAPI_ENTIRE)));
>  	ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL));
>  
>  	if (XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !xfs_ifork_has_extents(ip, whichfork)) ||
> @@ -3918,16 +3917,6 @@ xfs_bmapi_read(
>  
>  	ifp = XFS_IFORK_PTR(ip, whichfork);
>  	if (!ifp) {
> -		/* No CoW fork?  Return a hole. */
> -		if (whichfork == XFS_COW_FORK) {
> -			mval->br_startoff = bno;
> -			mval->br_startblock = HOLESTARTBLOCK;
> -			mval->br_blockcount = len;
> -			mval->br_state = XFS_EXT_NORM;
> -			*nmap = 1;
> -			return 0;
> -		}
> -
>  		/*
>  		 * A missing attr ifork implies that the inode says we're in
>  		 * extents or btree format but failed to pass the inode fork
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-01 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-01  8:14 dinode reading cleanups Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-01  8:14 ` [PATCH 01/12] xfs: xfs_bmapi_read doesn't take a fork id as the last argument Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-01 13:33   ` Brian Foster
2020-05-01  8:14 ` [PATCH 02/12] xfs: call xfs_iformat_fork from xfs_inode_from_disk Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-01 13:33   ` Brian Foster
2020-05-01  8:14 ` [PATCH 03/12] xfs: split xfs_iformat_fork Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-01 13:34   ` Brian Foster
2020-05-07 12:27     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-07 13:40       ` Brian Foster
2020-05-07 13:42         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-01  8:14 ` [PATCH 04/12] xfs: handle unallocated inodes in xfs_inode_from_disk Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-01 13:34   ` Brian Foster
2020-05-01  8:14 ` [PATCH 05/12] xfs: call xfs_dinode_verify from xfs_inode_from_disk Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-01 13:34   ` Brian Foster
2020-05-01  8:14 ` [PATCH 06/12] xfs: don't reset i_delayed_blks in xfs_iread Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-01 13:34   ` Brian Foster
2020-05-01  8:14 ` [PATCH 07/12] xfs: remove xfs_iread Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-01 15:56   ` Brian Foster
2020-05-01  8:14 ` [PATCH 08/12] xfs: remove xfs_ifork_ops Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-01 15:56   ` Brian Foster
2020-05-01 16:08     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-01 16:38       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-01 16:50         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-01 18:23           ` Brian Foster
2020-05-07 12:34             ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-07 13:43               ` Brian Foster
2020-05-07 16:28                 ` Brian Foster
2020-05-07 17:18                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-12 23:50                     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-01  8:14 ` [PATCH 09/12] xfs: refactor xfs_inode_verify_forks Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-01 15:57   ` Brian Foster
2020-05-01 16:40     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-01 17:02       ` Brian Foster
2020-05-01 17:08         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-01  8:14 ` [PATCH 10/12] xfs: improve local fork verification Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-01  8:14 ` [PATCH 11/12] xfs: remove the special COW fork handling in xfs_bmapi_read Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-01 15:57   ` Brian Foster [this message]
2020-05-01  8:14 ` [PATCH 12/12] xfs: remove the NULL " Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-01 15:58   ` Brian Foster
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-05-08  6:34 dinode reading cleanups v2 Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-08  6:34 ` [PATCH 11/12] xfs: remove the special COW fork handling in xfs_bmapi_read Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-16 17:52   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-17  7:56     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200501155742.GQ40250@bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).