linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/21] xfs: refactor recovered EFI log item playback
Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 10:58:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200501175832.GY6742@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200501101947.GA1201@infradead.org>

On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 03:19:47AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 05:48:59PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > +STATIC int xfs_efi_recover(struct xfs_mount *mp, struct xfs_efi_log_item *efip);
> 
> Can you just move xfs_efi_item_ops down a bit to avoid the forward
> declaration?  Same for the other patches doing the same.

I can, but then I need a forward declaration of xfs_efi_item_ops,
because xfs_efi_init needs the symbol, and the ->create_intent function
inside the item_ops needs xfs_efi_init.

Still, a forward declaration of a static variable is easier to maintain
than a function decl, so I'll change it.

--D

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-01 17:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-30  0:47 [PATCH v2 00/21] xfs: refactor log recovery Darrick J. Wong
2020-04-30  0:47 ` [PATCH 01/21] xfs: refactor log recovery item sorting into a generic dispatch structure Darrick J. Wong
2020-04-30  5:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-30 15:08     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-04-30 18:16       ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-01  8:08         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-01 10:40   ` Chandan Rajendra
2020-04-30  0:47 ` [PATCH 02/21] xfs: refactor log recovery item dispatch for pass2 readhead functions Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-01 12:10   ` Chandan Rajendra
2020-04-30  0:47 ` [PATCH 03/21] xfs: refactor log recovery item dispatch for pass1 commit functions Darrick J. Wong
2020-04-30  0:48 ` [PATCH 04/21] xfs: refactor log recovery buffer item dispatch for pass2 " Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-01 13:43   ` Chandan Rajendra
2020-04-30  0:48 ` [PATCH 05/21] xfs: refactor log recovery inode " Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-01 14:03   ` Chandan Rajendra
2020-04-30  0:48 ` [PATCH 06/21] xfs: refactor log recovery dquot " Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-01 14:14   ` Chandan Rajendra
2020-04-30  0:48 ` [PATCH 07/21] xfs: refactor log recovery icreate " Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-01 14:18   ` Chandan Rajendra
2020-04-30  0:48 ` [PATCH 08/21] xfs: remove log recovery quotaoff " Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-01 15:09   ` Chandan Rajendra
2020-05-01 17:41     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-04-30  0:48 ` [PATCH 09/21] xfs: refactor log recovery EFI " Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-01 10:28   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-01 17:56     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-04-30  0:48 ` [PATCH 10/21] xfs: refactor log recovery RUI " Darrick J. Wong
2020-04-30  0:48 ` [PATCH 11/21] xfs: refactor log recovery CUI " Darrick J. Wong
2020-04-30  0:48 ` [PATCH 12/21] xfs: refactor log recovery BUI " Darrick J. Wong
2020-04-30  0:48 ` [PATCH 13/21] xfs: refactor recovered EFI log item playback Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-01 10:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-01 17:58     ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-04-30  0:49 ` [PATCH 14/21] xfs: refactor recovered RUI " Darrick J. Wong
2020-04-30  0:49 ` [PATCH 15/21] xfs: refactor recovered CUI " Darrick J. Wong
2020-04-30  0:49 ` [PATCH 16/21] xfs: refactor recovered BUI " Darrick J. Wong
2020-04-30  0:49 ` [PATCH 17/21] xfs: refactor releasing finished intents during log recovery Darrick J. Wong
2020-04-30  0:49 ` [PATCH 18/21] xfs: refactor adding recovered intent items to the log Darrick J. Wong
2020-04-30  0:49 ` [PATCH 19/21] xfs: refactor intent item RECOVERED flag into the log item Darrick J. Wong
2020-04-30  0:49 ` [PATCH 20/21] xfs: refactor intent item iop_recover calls Darrick J. Wong
2020-04-30  0:49 ` [PATCH 21/21] xfs: remove unnecessary includes from xfs_log_recover.c Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-01 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 00/21] xfs: refactor log recovery Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-01 16:53   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-01 17:03     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200501175832.GY6742@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).