From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF54FC38A24 for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 16:15:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7E57208D6 for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 16:15:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726393AbgEGQPC (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2020 12:15:02 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:47614 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726222AbgEGQPC (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2020 12:15:02 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 40DD168B05; Thu, 7 May 2020 18:14:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 18:14:58 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "Darrick J. Wong" , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: libxfs 5.7 resync Message-ID: <20200507161458.GA1033@lst.de> References: <20200507121851.304002-1-hch@lst.de> <20200507154809.GH6714@magnolia> <20200507155454.GB32006@lst.de> <20200507161117.GA718@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 11:12:55AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > > On 5/7/20 11:11 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > And FYI, the xfs_check failures also appear with your branch. > > > > > diff -Nurp -x .git -x m4 xfsprogs-hch-5.7/db/check.c xfsprogs-maint-5.7/db/check.c > --- xfsprogs-hch-5.7/db/check.c 2020-05-07 12:00:56.134700951 -0400 > +++ xfsprogs-maint-5.7/db/check.c 2020-05-01 23:33:19.864639307 -0400 > @@ -2707,6 +2707,8 @@ process_inode( > "dev", "local", "extents", "btree", "uuid" > }; > > + /* xfs_inode_from_disk expects to have an mp to work with */ > + xino.i_mount = mp; > libxfs_inode_from_disk(&xino, dip); That looks like a hot contender :) I'm curious why it didn't crash, though.