public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] xfs: cleanup xfs_idestroy_fork
Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 11:10:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200516181048.GG6714@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200512185435.GL37029@bfoster>

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 02:54:35PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 09:24:04AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Move freeing the dynamically allocated attr and COW fork, as well
> > as zeroing the pointers where actually needed into the callers, and
> > just pass the xfs_ifork structure to xfs_idestroy_fork.  Simplify
> > the kmem_free calls by not checking for NULL first, and not zeroing
> > the pointers in structure that are about to be freed (either the
> > ifork or the containing inode in case of the data fork).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c  |  7 +++----
> >  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c  |  2 +-
> >  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.c | 36 +++++++++-------------------------
> >  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.h |  2 +-
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_attr_inactive.c     |  7 +++++--
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c            | 15 ++++++++------
> >  6 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> > 
> ...
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.c
> > index 6562f2bcd15cc..577cc20e03170 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.c
> > @@ -495,38 +495,20 @@ xfs_idata_realloc(
> >  
> >  void
> >  xfs_idestroy_fork(
> > -	xfs_inode_t	*ip,
> > -	int		whichfork)
> > +	struct xfs_ifork	*ifp)
> >  {
> > -	struct xfs_ifork	*ifp;
> > -
> > -	ifp = XFS_IFORK_PTR(ip, whichfork);
> > -	if (ifp->if_broot != NULL) {
> > -		kmem_free(ifp->if_broot);
> > -		ifp->if_broot = NULL;
> > -	}
> > +	kmem_free(ifp->if_broot);
> 
> I think this function should still reset the pointers within the ifp
> that it frees (if_broot and if_data below), particularly as long as
> there are multiple callers that pass the data fork because it is not
> immediately/independently freed. IOW, it's not clear if something
> happens to reset i_mode between when xfs_inode_from_disk() might fail
> and destroy the data fork, and when the inode is ultimately freed and we
> look at i_mode to determine whether to destroy the data fork.

/me agrees, let's not leave a potential UAF landmine here.

--D

> Brian
> 
> >  
> >  	/*
> > -	 * If the format is local, then we can't have an extents
> > -	 * array so just look for an inline data array.  If we're
> > -	 * not local then we may or may not have an extents list,
> > -	 * so check and free it up if we do.
> > +	 * If the format is local, then we can't have an extents array so just
> > +	 * look for an inline data array.  If we're not local then we may or may
> > +	 * not have an extents list, so check and free it up if we do.
> >  	 */
> >  	if (ifp->if_format == XFS_DINODE_FMT_LOCAL) {
> > -		if (ifp->if_u1.if_data != NULL) {
> > -			kmem_free(ifp->if_u1.if_data);
> > -			ifp->if_u1.if_data = NULL;
> > -		}
> > -	} else if ((ifp->if_flags & XFS_IFEXTENTS) && ifp->if_height) {
> > -		xfs_iext_destroy(ifp);
> > -	}
> > -
> > -	if (whichfork == XFS_ATTR_FORK) {
> > -		kmem_cache_free(xfs_ifork_zone, ip->i_afp);
> > -		ip->i_afp = NULL;
> > -	} else if (whichfork == XFS_COW_FORK) {
> > -		kmem_cache_free(xfs_ifork_zone, ip->i_cowfp);
> > -		ip->i_cowfp = NULL;
> > +		kmem_free(ifp->if_u1.if_data);
> > +	} else if (ifp->if_flags & XFS_IFEXTENTS) {
> > +		if (ifp->if_height)
> > +			xfs_iext_destroy(ifp);
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.h
> > index d849cca103edd..a4953e95c4f3f 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.h
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.h
> > @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ int		xfs_iformat_data_fork(struct xfs_inode *, struct xfs_dinode *);
> >  int		xfs_iformat_attr_fork(struct xfs_inode *, struct xfs_dinode *);
> >  void		xfs_iflush_fork(struct xfs_inode *, struct xfs_dinode *,
> >  				struct xfs_inode_log_item *, int);
> > -void		xfs_idestroy_fork(struct xfs_inode *, int);
> > +void		xfs_idestroy_fork(struct xfs_ifork *ifp);
> >  void		xfs_idata_realloc(struct xfs_inode *ip, int64_t byte_diff,
> >  				int whichfork);
> >  void		xfs_iroot_realloc(struct xfs_inode *, int, int);
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_inactive.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_inactive.c
> > index 00ffc46c0bf71..bfad669e6b2f8 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_inactive.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_inactive.c
> > @@ -388,8 +388,11 @@ xfs_attr_inactive(
> >  	xfs_trans_cancel(trans);
> >  out_destroy_fork:
> >  	/* kill the in-core attr fork before we drop the inode lock */
> > -	if (dp->i_afp)
> > -		xfs_idestroy_fork(dp, XFS_ATTR_FORK);
> > +	if (dp->i_afp) {
> > +		xfs_idestroy_fork(dp->i_afp);
> > +		kmem_cache_free(xfs_ifork_zone, dp->i_afp);
> > +		dp->i_afp = NULL;
> > +	}
> >  	if (lock_mode)
> >  		xfs_iunlock(dp, lock_mode);
> >  	return error;
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> > index c09b3e9eab1da..d806d3bfa8936 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> > @@ -87,15 +87,18 @@ xfs_inode_free_callback(
> >  	case S_IFREG:
> >  	case S_IFDIR:
> >  	case S_IFLNK:
> > -		xfs_idestroy_fork(ip, XFS_DATA_FORK);
> > +		xfs_idestroy_fork(&ip->i_df);
> >  		break;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	if (ip->i_afp)
> > -		xfs_idestroy_fork(ip, XFS_ATTR_FORK);
> > -	if (ip->i_cowfp)
> > -		xfs_idestroy_fork(ip, XFS_COW_FORK);
> > -
> > +	if (ip->i_afp) {
> > +		xfs_idestroy_fork(ip->i_afp);
> > +		kmem_cache_free(xfs_ifork_zone, ip->i_afp);
> > +	}
> > +	if (ip->i_cowfp) {
> > +		xfs_idestroy_fork(ip->i_cowfp);
> > +		kmem_cache_free(xfs_ifork_zone, ip->i_cowfp);
> > +	}
> >  	if (ip->i_itemp) {
> >  		ASSERT(!test_bit(XFS_LI_IN_AIL,
> >  				 &ip->i_itemp->ili_item.li_flags));
> > -- 
> > 2.26.2
> > 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-16 18:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-10  7:23 move the extent count and format into struct xfs_ifork Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-10  7:23 ` [PATCH 1/6] xfs: use XFS_IFORK_BOFF xchk_bmap_check_rmaps Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-11 11:40   ` Chandan Babu R
2020-05-12 15:31     ` Brian Foster
2020-05-12 15:38       ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-12 16:14         ` Brian Foster
2020-05-12 19:16           ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-13 13:19             ` Brian Foster
2020-05-13 13:21               ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-16 18:42   ` [PATCH] xfs: clean up xchk_bmap_check_rmaps usage of XFS_IFORK_Q Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-16 20:01     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-17  8:05       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-10  7:24 ` [PATCH 2/6] xfs: remove the XFS_DFORK_Q macro Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-11 12:39   ` Chandan Babu R
2020-05-12 15:31   ` Brian Foster
2020-05-16 18:02   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-10  7:24 ` [PATCH 3/6] xfs: remove xfs_ifree_local_data Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-11 16:32   ` Chandan Babu R
2020-05-12 15:31   ` Brian Foster
2020-05-16 18:07   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-24 12:14     ` Alex Lyakas
2020-05-10  7:24 ` [PATCH 4/6] xfs: move the per-fork nextents fields into struct xfs_ifork Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-12  5:26   ` Chandan Babu R
2020-05-12 16:10   ` Brian Foster
2020-05-16 18:09     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-17  8:12     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-10  7:24 ` [PATCH 5/6] xfs: move the fork format " Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-12  9:37   ` Chandan Babu R
2020-05-12 18:53   ` Brian Foster
2020-05-14 21:25   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-16 13:58     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-16 17:01       ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-16 18:01         ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-16 18:16           ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-16 18:29             ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-10  7:24 ` [PATCH 6/6] xfs: cleanup xfs_idestroy_fork Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-12  9:48   ` Chandan Babu R
2020-05-12 18:54   ` Brian Foster
2020-05-16 18:10     ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-05-18  7:33 move the extent count and format into struct xfs_ifork v2 Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18  7:33 ` [PATCH 6/6] xfs: cleanup xfs_idestroy_fork Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18 13:28   ` Brian Foster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200516181048.GG6714@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox