public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>, david@fromorbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: use ordered buffers to initialize dquot buffers during quotacheck
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 09:52:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200518165256.GD17627@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200518131625.GC10938@bfoster>

On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 09:16:25AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 09:56:58AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > 
> ...
> > 
> > Fix this by changing the ondisk dquot initialization function to use
> > ordered buffers to write out fresh dquot blocks if it detects that we're
> > running quotacheck.  If the system goes down before quotacheck can
> > complete, the CHKD flags will not be set in the superblock and the next
> > mount will run quotacheck again, which can fix uninitialized dquot
> > buffers.  This requires amending the defer code to maintaine ordered
> > buffer state across defer rolls for the sake of the dquot allocation
> > code.
> > 
> > For regular operations we preserve the current behavior since the dquot
> > items require properly initialized ondisk dquot records.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > v2: rework the code comment explaining all this
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.c |   10 +++++++
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c        |   62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >  2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > 
> ...
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c
> > index 52e0f7245afc..f60a8967f9d5 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c
> ...
> > @@ -238,11 +240,45 @@ xfs_qm_init_dquot_blk(
> ...
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * When quotacheck runs, we use delayed writes to update all the dquots
> > +	 * on disk in an efficient manner instead of logging the individual
> > +	 * dquot changes as they are made.
> > +	 *
> > +	 * Hence if we log the buffer that we allocate here, then crash
> > +	 * post-quotacheck while the logged initialisation is still in the
> > +	 * active region of the log, we can lose the information quotacheck
> > +	 * wrote directly to the buffer. That is, log recovery will replay the
> > +	 * dquot buffer initialisation over the top of whatever information
> > +	 * quotacheck had written to the buffer.
> > +	 *
> > +	 * To avoid this problem, dquot allocation during quotacheck needs to
> > +	 * avoid logging the initialised buffer, but we still need to have
> > +	 * writeback of the buffer pin the tail of the log so that it is
> > +	 * initialised on disk before we remove the allocation transaction from
> > +	 * the active region of the log. Marking the buffer as ordered instead
> > +	 * of logging it provides this behaviour.
> > +	 *
> > +	 * If we crash before quotacheck completes, a subsequent quotacheck run
> > +	 * will re-allocate and re-initialize the dquot records as needed.
> > +	 */
> 
> I took a stab at condensing the comment a bit, FWIW (diff below). LGTM
> either way. Thanks for the update.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> 
> > +	if (!(mp->m_qflags & qflag))
> > +		xfs_trans_ordered_buf(tp, bp);
> > +	else
> > +		xfs_trans_log_buf(tp, bp, 0, BBTOB(q->qi_dqchunklen) - 1);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /*
> > 
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c
> index f60a8967f9d5..55b95d45303b 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c
> @@ -254,26 +254,20 @@ xfs_qm_init_dquot_blk(
>  	xfs_trans_dquot_buf(tp, bp, blftype);
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * When quotacheck runs, we use delayed writes to update all the dquots
> -	 * on disk in an efficient manner instead of logging the individual
> -	 * dquot changes as they are made.
> +	 * quotacheck uses delayed writes to update all the dquots on disk in an
> +	 * efficient manner instead of logging the individual dquot changes as
> +	 * they are made. However if we log the buffer allocated here and crash
> +	 * after quotacheck while the logged initialisation is still in the
> +	 * active region of the log, log recovery can replay the dquot buffer
> +	 * initialisation over the top of the checked dquots and corrupt quota
> +	 * accounting.
>  	 *
> -	 * Hence if we log the buffer that we allocate here, then crash
> -	 * post-quotacheck while the logged initialisation is still in the
> -	 * active region of the log, we can lose the information quotacheck
> -	 * wrote directly to the buffer. That is, log recovery will replay the
> -	 * dquot buffer initialisation over the top of whatever information
> -	 * quotacheck had written to the buffer.
> -	 *
> -	 * To avoid this problem, dquot allocation during quotacheck needs to
> -	 * avoid logging the initialised buffer, but we still need to have
> -	 * writeback of the buffer pin the tail of the log so that it is
> -	 * initialised on disk before we remove the allocation transaction from
> -	 * the active region of the log. Marking the buffer as ordered instead
> -	 * of logging it provides this behaviour.
> -	 *
> -	 * If we crash before quotacheck completes, a subsequent quotacheck run
> -	 * will re-allocate and re-initialize the dquot records as needed.
> +	 * To avoid this problem, quotacheck cannot log the initialised buffer.
> +	 * We must still dirty the buffer and write it back before the
> +	 * allocation transaction clears the log. Therefore, mark the buffer as
> +	 * ordered instead of logging it directly. This is safe for quotacheck
> +	 * because it detects and repairs allocated but initialized dquot blocks
> +	 * in the quota inodes.

I think I like your revised comment better. :)

--D

>  	 */
>  	if (!(mp->m_qflags & qflag))
>  		xfs_trans_ordered_buf(tp, bp);
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-18 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-14 16:56 [PATCH v2] xfs: use ordered buffers to initialize dquot buffers during quotacheck Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-18 13:16 ` Brian Foster
2020-05-18 16:52   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-05-18 16:58 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200518165256.GD17627@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox