From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>, Leonardo Vaz <lvaz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: fix progress reporting
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 17:58:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200519005809.GG17627@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c4df68a7-706b-0216-b2a0-a177789f380f@redhat.com>
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 05:35:33PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Long ago, a young developer tried to fix a segfault in xfs_repair where
> a short progress reporting interval could cause a timer to go off and try
> to print a progress mesage before any had been properly set up because
> we were still busy zeroing the log, and a NULL pointer dereference
> ensued.
>
> That young developer got it wrong, and completely broke progress
> reporting, because the change caused us to exit early from the pthread
> start routine, and not initialize the progress timer at all.
>
> That developer is now slightly older and wiser, and finally realizes that
> the simple and correct solution here is to initialize the message format
> to the first one in the list, so that we will be ready to go with a
> progress message no matter when the first timer goes off.
>
> Reported-by: Leonardo Vaz <lvaz@redhat.com>
> Fixes: 7f2d6b811755 ("xfs_repair: avoid segfault if reporting progre...")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> It might be nice to add progress reporting for the log zeroing, but that
> requires renumbering all these macros, and we don't/can't actually get
> any fine-grained progress at all, so probably not worth it.
>
> diff --git a/repair/progress.c b/repair/progress.c
> index 5ee08229..d7baa606 100644
> --- a/repair/progress.c
> +++ b/repair/progress.c
> @@ -125,7 +125,11 @@ init_progress_rpt (void)
> */
>
> pthread_mutex_init(&global_msgs.mutex, NULL);
> - global_msgs.format = NULL;
> + /*
> + * Ensure the format string is not NULL in case the first timer
> + * goes off before any stage calls set_progress_msg() to set it.
> + */
> + global_msgs.format = &progress_rpt_reports[0];
Hmm so does that mean the first progress report could be for "scanning
freespace"?
Or could you append a new entry to progress_rpt_reports for "getting my
shit together and moving out of my parents basement" and initialize it
to that?
--D
> global_msgs.count = glob_agcount;
> global_msgs.interval = report_interval;
> global_msgs.done = prog_rpt_done;
> @@ -171,10 +175,6 @@ progress_rpt_thread (void *p)
> msg_block_t *msgp = (msg_block_t *)p;
> uint64_t percent;
>
> - /* It's possible to get here very early w/ no progress msg set */
> - if (!msgp->format)
> - return NULL;
> -
> if ((msgbuf = (char *)malloc(DURATION_BUF_SIZE)) == NULL)
> do_error (_("progress_rpt: cannot malloc progress msg buffer\n"));
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-19 0:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-18 22:35 [PATCH] xfs_repair: fix progress reporting Eric Sandeen
2020-05-19 0:58 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-05-19 1:03 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-05-19 1:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-19 1:15 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-05-19 1:29 ` [PATCH V2] " Eric Sandeen
2020-05-19 2:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-19 7:03 ` Donald Douwsma
2020-05-19 12:53 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-05-19 23:38 ` Donald Douwsma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200519005809.GG17627@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvaz@redhat.com \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox