From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90615C433E0 for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 21:55:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F9E120823 for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 21:55:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728339AbgETVzt (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2020 17:55:49 -0400 Received: from mail104.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.246]:59124 "EHLO mail104.syd.optusnet.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728329AbgETVzs (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2020 17:55:48 -0400 Received: from dread.disaster.area (pa49-195-157-175.pa.nsw.optusnet.com.au [49.195.157.175]) by mail104.syd.optusnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E0997EBF8A; Thu, 21 May 2020 07:55:45 +1000 (AEST) Received: from dave by dread.disaster.area with local (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1jbWgU-0000Pn-LT; Thu, 21 May 2020 07:55:30 +1000 Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 07:55:30 +1000 From: Dave Chinner To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 V2] xfs: gut error handling in xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb() Message-ID: <20200520215530.GZ2040@dread.disaster.area> References: <20200519214840.2570159-1-david@fromorbit.com> <20200519214840.2570159-2-david@fromorbit.com> <20200520073358.GX2040@dread.disaster.area> <20200520074805.GA21299@infradead.org> <20200520202702.GA17627@magnolia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200520202702.GA17627@magnolia> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Optus-CM-Score: 0 X-Optus-CM-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=QIgWuTDL c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=ONQRW0k9raierNYdzxQi9Q==:117 a=ONQRW0k9raierNYdzxQi9Q==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=sTwFKg_x9MkA:10 a=7-415B0cAAAA:8 a=WXqzqgKzuLsPc6fZo_IA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=biEYGPWJfzWAr4FL6Ov7:22 Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 01:27:02PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 12:48:05AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 05:33:58PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > + /* > > > + * Debug checks outside of the spinlock so they don't lock up the > > > + * machine if they fail. > > > + */ > > > + ASSERT(mp->m_sb.sb_frextents >= 0); > > > + ASSERT(mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks >= 0); > > > + ASSERT(mp->m_sb.sb_agcount >= 0); > > > + ASSERT(mp->m_sb.sb_imax_pct >= 0); > > > + ASSERT(mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize >= 0); > > > + ASSERT(mp->m_sb.sb_rbmblocks >= 0); > > > + ASSERT(mp->m_sb.sb_rblocks >= 0); > > > + ASSERT(mp->m_sb.sb_rextents >= 0); > > > + ASSERT(mp->m_sb.sb_rextslog >= 0); > > Except for imax_pct and rextslog, all of these are unsigned quantities, > right? So the asserts will /never/ trigger? In truth, I didn't look that far. I just assumed that because all the xfs_sb_mod*() functions used signed math that they could all underflow/overflow. IOWs, the checking for overflow/underflow was completely wrong in the first place. Should I just remove the ASSERT()s entirely? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com