linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] repair: set the in-core inode parent in phase 3
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 19:42:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200715184224.GA23618@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200715140836.10197-2-bfoster@redhat.com>

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:08:33AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> The inode processing code checks and resets invalid parent values on
> physical inodes in phase 3 but waits to update the parent value in
> the in-core tracking until phase 4. There doesn't appear to be any
> specific reason for the latter beyond caution. In reality, the only
> reason this doesn't cause problems is that phase 3 replaces an
> invalid on-disk parent with another invalid value, so the in-core
> parent returned by phase 4 translates to NULLFSINO.
> 
> This is subtle and fragile. To eliminate this duplicate processing
> behavior and break the subtle dependency of requiring an invalid
> dummy value in physical directory inodes, update the in-core parent
> tracking structure at the same point in phase 3 that physical inodes
> are updated. Invalid on-disk parent values will still translate to
> NULLFSINO for the in-core tracking to be identified by later phases.
> This ensures that if a valid dummy value is placed in a physical
> inode (such as rootino) with an invalid parent in phase 3, phase 4
> won't mistakenly return the valid dummy value to be incorrectly set
> in the in-core tracking over the NULLFSINO value that represents the
> broken on-disk state.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-15 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-15 14:08 [PATCH 0/4] xfsprogs: remove custom dir2 sf fork verifier from repair Brian Foster
2020-07-15 14:08 ` [PATCH 1/4] repair: set the in-core inode parent in phase 3 Brian Foster
2020-07-15 18:42   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-07-21  0:57   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-15 14:08 ` [PATCH 2/4] repair: don't double check dir2 sf parent in phase 4 Brian Foster
2020-07-15 18:43   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-15 23:54     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-16 10:39       ` Brian Foster
2020-07-21  0:55   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-15 14:08 ` [PATCH 3/4] repair: use fs root ino for dummy parent value instead of zero Brian Foster
2020-07-15 18:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-15 22:22   ` Dave Chinner
2020-07-16 10:41     ` Brian Foster
2020-07-16 22:06       ` Dave Chinner
2020-07-17 11:57         ` Brian Foster
2020-07-17 11:59   ` [PATCH v2] repair: use fs rootino " Brian Foster
2020-07-20  3:21     ` Dave Chinner
2020-07-21  0:47     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-15 14:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] repair: remove custom dir2 sf fork verifier from phase6 Brian Foster
2020-07-15 18:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-21  0:47   ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200715184224.GA23618@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).