From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C97DC433E1 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 19:22:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC312070B for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 19:22:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="KgVPcnfx" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726493AbgGXTWI (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 15:22:08 -0400 Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:45492 "EHLO userp2120.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726411AbgGXTWI (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 15:22:08 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 06OJ7ZOn128973; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 19:21:53 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=6o4P7f3jEHoOlOwl4rL0uCOl7525o/Pzc78JCfuBlhw=; b=KgVPcnfxW/7p4QTxdpBbokHnhJGZ1UZZJBt0C+BYsVK1ZniVyRxORg9xCrZMShe6J2Wz Ay1mRmIIq9nEaGryLi/M+FTkZI1RLowSCwaaWnP81zx5jX3k68ySvgjIdJs8G9WvNJZi 4kKijBZK+4jWm49ISOdH5/l4bdSpc2ymGBRHTkTaFFvd9u2PSAx5BCWc1n78uffdR9iX hreOC7NPy2QLiR0oNfzmnyGX92YRgeZcy839KuwjRdn3hJt//9pa1KCXDtSBplokyr/P +XS7OM/dD687+Uz1aWw4CDGpAr0p6skG+O+SfsePE2oxcSJF1oJdBHCJ9M4GBcp4xna2 WQ== Received: from aserp3030.oracle.com (aserp3030.oracle.com [141.146.126.71]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 32d6kt528n-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 19:21:53 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 06OJFF8j160508; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 19:21:52 GMT Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by aserp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 32g49qbhqc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 19:21:52 +0000 Received: from abhmp0003.oracle.com (abhmp0003.oracle.com [141.146.116.9]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 06OJLiQQ002700; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 19:21:45 GMT Received: from localhost (/67.169.218.210) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:21:44 -0700 Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:21:42 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Eric Sandeen Cc: linux-xfs , Dave Chinner , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [DEVEL] libxfs update timing for xfsprogs 5.8.0 Message-ID: <20200724192142.GK7625@magnolia> References: <1088d142-1e80-aaac-62eb-2b01f0fc9c63@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1088d142-1e80-aaac-62eb-2b01f0fc9c63@sandeen.net> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9692 signatures=668680 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=1 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2007240138 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9692 signatures=668680 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2007240138 Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:08:21PM -0700, Eric Sandeen wrote: > At one point there was a little discussion about whether it might > be better to defer libxfs/ syncing to later in the release, rather > than doing it at the beginning. I'm happy to do it either way. > > Do we have a preference for 5.8.0, would one be better than the other > for anyone working on major xfsprogs updates? > > (Darrick probably already has his work staged on top of a libxfs > sync, so there's that ...) I wouldn't mind if the xfs_repair quotacheck stuff went in before the libxfs sync... :) --D > -Eric