From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 08/13] xfs: updating i_next_unlinked doesn't need to return old value
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 19:25:51 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200812092556.2567285-9-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200812092556.2567285-1-david@fromorbit.com>
From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
We already know what the next inode in the unlinked list is supposed
to be from the in-memory list, so we do not need to look it up first
from the current inode to be able to update in memory list
pointers...
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 63 +++++++++++-----------------------------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
index bacd5ae9f5a7..4dde1970f7cd 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
@@ -1998,13 +1998,11 @@ xfs_iunlink_update_inode(
struct xfs_trans *tp,
struct xfs_inode *ip,
xfs_agnumber_t agno,
- xfs_agino_t next_agino,
- xfs_agino_t *old_next_agino)
+ xfs_agino_t next_agino)
{
struct xfs_mount *mp = tp->t_mountp;
struct xfs_dinode *dip;
struct xfs_buf *ibp;
- xfs_agino_t old_value;
int error;
ASSERT(xfs_verify_agino_or_null(mp, agno, next_agino));
@@ -2013,37 +2011,10 @@ xfs_iunlink_update_inode(
if (error)
return error;
- /* Make sure the old pointer isn't garbage. */
- old_value = be32_to_cpu(dip->di_next_unlinked);
- if (!xfs_verify_agino_or_null(mp, agno, old_value)) {
- xfs_inode_verifier_error(ip, -EFSCORRUPTED, __func__, dip,
- sizeof(*dip), __this_address);
- error = -EFSCORRUPTED;
- goto out;
- }
-
- /*
- * Since we're updating a linked list, we should never find that the
- * current pointer is the same as the new value, unless we're
- * terminating the list.
- */
- *old_next_agino = old_value;
- if (old_value == next_agino) {
- if (next_agino != NULLAGINO) {
- xfs_inode_verifier_error(ip, -EFSCORRUPTED, __func__,
- dip, sizeof(*dip), __this_address);
- error = -EFSCORRUPTED;
- }
- goto out;
- }
-
/* Ok, update the new pointer. */
xfs_iunlink_update_dinode(tp, agno, XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, ip->i_ino),
ibp, dip, &ip->i_imap, next_agino);
return 0;
-out:
- xfs_trans_brelse(tp, ibp);
- return error;
}
static int
@@ -2079,19 +2050,15 @@ xfs_iunlink_insert_inode(
nip = list_first_entry_or_null(&agibp->b_pag->pag_ici_unlink_list,
struct xfs_inode, i_unlink);
if (nip) {
- xfs_agino_t old_agino;
-
ASSERT(next_agino == XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, nip->i_ino));
/*
* There is already another inode in the bucket, so point this
* inode to the current head of the list.
*/
- error = xfs_iunlink_update_inode(tp, ip, agno, next_agino,
- &old_agino);
+ error = xfs_iunlink_update_inode(tp, ip, agno, next_agino);
if (error)
return error;
- ASSERT(old_agino == NULLAGINO);
} else {
ASSERT(next_agino == NULLAGINO);
}
@@ -2149,7 +2116,7 @@ xfs_iunlink_remove_inode(
struct xfs_agi *agi;
xfs_agino_t agino = XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, ip->i_ino);
xfs_agnumber_t agno = XFS_INO_TO_AGNO(mp, ip->i_ino);
- xfs_agino_t next_agino;
+ xfs_agino_t next_agino = NULLAGINO;
xfs_agino_t head_agino;
int error;
@@ -2169,23 +2136,21 @@ xfs_iunlink_remove_inode(
}
/*
- * Set our inode's next_unlinked pointer to NULL and then return
- * the old pointer value so that we can update whatever was previous
- * to us in the list to point to whatever was next in the list.
+ * Get the next agino in the list. If we are at the end of the list,
+ * then the previous inode's i_next_unlinked filed will get cleared.
*/
- error = xfs_iunlink_update_inode(tp, ip, agno, NULLAGINO, &next_agino);
+ if (ip != list_last_entry(&agibp->b_pag->pag_ici_unlink_list,
+ struct xfs_inode, i_unlink)) {
+ struct xfs_inode *nip = list_next_entry(ip, i_unlink);
+
+ next_agino = XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, nip->i_ino);
+ }
+
+ /* Clear the on disk next unlinked pointer for this inode. */
+ error = xfs_iunlink_update_inode(tp, ip, agno, NULLAGINO);
if (error)
return error;
-#ifdef DEBUG
- {
- struct xfs_inode *nip = list_next_entry(ip, i_unlink);
- if (nip)
- ASSERT(next_agino == XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, nip->i_ino));
- else
- ASSERT(next_agino == NULLAGINO);
- }
-#endif
if (ip != list_first_entry(&agibp->b_pag->pag_ici_unlink_list,
struct xfs_inode, i_unlink)) {
--
2.26.2.761.g0e0b3e54be
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-12 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-12 9:25 [PATCH 00/13] xfs: in memory inode unlink log items Dave Chinner
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 01/13] xfs: xfs_iflock is no longer a completion Dave Chinner
2020-08-18 23:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-22 7:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 02/13] xfs: add log item precommit operation Dave Chinner
2020-08-22 9:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 03/13] xfs: factor the xfs_iunlink functions Dave Chinner
2020-08-18 23:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-22 7:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 04/13] xfs: arrange all unlinked inodes into one list Dave Chinner
2020-08-18 23:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-19 0:45 ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-19 0:58 ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-22 9:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-23 17:24 ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-24 8:19 ` [RFC PATCH] xfs: use log_incompat feature instead of speculate matching Gao Xiang
2020-08-24 8:34 ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-24 15:08 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-24 15:41 ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-25 10:06 ` [PATCH] " Gao Xiang
2020-08-25 14:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-25 15:30 ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-27 7:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 05/13] xfs: add unlink list pointers to xfs_inode Dave Chinner
2020-08-19 0:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-19 0:47 ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-22 9:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-25 5:17 ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-27 7:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 06/13] xfs: replace iunlink backref lookups with list lookups Dave Chinner
2020-08-19 0:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-19 0:52 ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 07/13] xfs: mapping unlinked inodes is now redundant Dave Chinner
2020-08-19 0:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-12 9:25 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2020-08-19 0:19 ` [PATCH 08/13] xfs: updating i_next_unlinked doesn't need to return old value Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 09/13] xfs: validate the unlinked list pointer on update Dave Chinner
2020-08-19 0:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 10/13] xfs: re-order AGI updates in unlink list updates Dave Chinner
2020-08-19 0:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-19 1:01 ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 11/13] xfs: combine iunlink inode update functions Dave Chinner
2020-08-19 0:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 12/13] xfs: add in-memory iunlink log item Dave Chinner
2020-08-19 0:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 13/13] xfs: reorder iunlink remove operation in xfs_ifree Dave Chinner
2020-08-12 11:12 ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-19 0:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-18 18:17 ` [PATCH 00/13] xfs: in memory inode unlink log items Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-18 20:01 ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-18 21:42 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200812092556.2567285-9-david@fromorbit.com \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox