From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] xfs: in memory inode unlink log items
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 04:01:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200818200141.GA11372@xiangao.remote.csb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200818181745.GL6107@magnolia>
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:17:45AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 07:25:43PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > This is a cleaned up version of the original RFC I posted here:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20200623095015.1934171-1-david@fromorbit.com/
> >
> > The original description is preserved below for quick reference,
> > I'll just walk though the changes in this version:
> >
> > - rebased on current TOT and xfs/for-next
> > - split up into many smaller patches
> > - includes Xiang's single unlinked list bucket modification
> > - uses a list_head for the in memory double unlinked inode list
> > rather than aginos and lockless inode lookups
> > - much simpler as it doesn't need to look up inodes from agino
> > values
> > - iunlink log item changed to take an xfs_inode pointer rather than
> > an imap and agino values
> > - a handful of small cleanups that breaking up into small patches
> > allowed.
>
> Two questions: How does this patchset intersect with the other one that
> changes the iunlink series? I guess the v4 of that series (when it
> appears) is intended to be applied directly after this one?
(confirmed from IRC) Yeah, I looked through this patchset these days
and sent out another rebased version and yes it can be applied directly
instead.
also put a link here:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200818133015.25398-1-hsiangkao@redhat.com
Sorry for that I shouldn't use --in-reply-to as deep as this way.
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-18 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-12 9:25 [PATCH 00/13] xfs: in memory inode unlink log items Dave Chinner
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 01/13] xfs: xfs_iflock is no longer a completion Dave Chinner
2020-08-18 23:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-22 7:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 02/13] xfs: add log item precommit operation Dave Chinner
2020-08-22 9:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 03/13] xfs: factor the xfs_iunlink functions Dave Chinner
2020-08-18 23:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-22 7:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 04/13] xfs: arrange all unlinked inodes into one list Dave Chinner
2020-08-18 23:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-19 0:45 ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-19 0:58 ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-22 9:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-23 17:24 ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-24 8:19 ` [RFC PATCH] xfs: use log_incompat feature instead of speculate matching Gao Xiang
2020-08-24 8:34 ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-24 15:08 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-24 15:41 ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-25 10:06 ` [PATCH] " Gao Xiang
2020-08-25 14:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-25 15:30 ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-27 7:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 05/13] xfs: add unlink list pointers to xfs_inode Dave Chinner
2020-08-19 0:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-19 0:47 ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-22 9:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-25 5:17 ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-27 7:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 06/13] xfs: replace iunlink backref lookups with list lookups Dave Chinner
2020-08-19 0:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-19 0:52 ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 07/13] xfs: mapping unlinked inodes is now redundant Dave Chinner
2020-08-19 0:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 08/13] xfs: updating i_next_unlinked doesn't need to return old value Dave Chinner
2020-08-19 0:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 09/13] xfs: validate the unlinked list pointer on update Dave Chinner
2020-08-19 0:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 10/13] xfs: re-order AGI updates in unlink list updates Dave Chinner
2020-08-19 0:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-19 1:01 ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 11/13] xfs: combine iunlink inode update functions Dave Chinner
2020-08-19 0:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 12/13] xfs: add in-memory iunlink log item Dave Chinner
2020-08-19 0:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 13/13] xfs: reorder iunlink remove operation in xfs_ifree Dave Chinner
2020-08-12 11:12 ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-19 0:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-18 18:17 ` [PATCH 00/13] xfs: in memory inode unlink log items Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-18 20:01 ` Gao Xiang [this message]
2020-08-18 21:42 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200818200141.GA11372@xiangao.remote.csb \
--to=hsiangkao@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox