From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 02/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when trivally adding a new extent
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 07:49:33 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200818214933.GB21744@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200817065307.GB23516@infradead.org>
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 07:53:07AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 01:38:25PM +0530, Chandan Babu R wrote:
> > When adding a new data extent (without modifying an inode's existing
> > extents) the extent count increases only by 1. This commit checks for
> > extent count overflow in such cases.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 8 ++++++++
> > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.h | 2 ++
> > fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 5 +++++
> > fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c | 8 +++++++-
> > fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 5 +++++
> > fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c | 5 +++++
> > 6 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> > index 9c40d5971035..e64f645415b1 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> > @@ -4527,6 +4527,14 @@ xfs_bmapi_convert_delalloc(
> > return error;
> >
> > xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> > +
> > + if (whichfork == XFS_DATA_FORK) {
>
> Should we add COW fork special casing to xfs_iext_count_may_overflow
> instead?
>
> > + error = xfs_iext_count_may_overflow(ip, whichfork,
> > + XFS_IEXT_ADD_CNT);
>
> I find the XFS_IEXT_ADD_CNT define very confusing. An explicit 1 passed
> for a counter parameter makes a lot more sense to me.
I explicitly asked Chandan to convert all the magic numbers
sprinkled in the previous patch to defined values. It was impossible
to know whether the intended value was correct when it's just an
open coded number because we don't know what the number actually
stands for. And, in future, if we change the behaviour of a specific
operation, then we only have to change a single value rather than
having to track down and determine if every magic "1" is for an
extent add operation or something different.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-18 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-14 8:08 [PATCH V2 00/10] Bail out if transaction can cause extent count to overflow Chandan Babu R
2020-08-14 8:08 ` [PATCH V2 01/10] xfs: Add helper for checking per-inode extent count overflow Chandan Babu R
2020-08-17 6:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17 7:44 ` Chandan Babu R
2020-08-14 8:08 ` [PATCH V2 02/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when trivally adding a new extent Chandan Babu R
2020-08-17 6:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17 7:44 ` Chandan Babu R
2020-08-27 8:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-27 13:51 ` Chandan Babu R
2020-08-18 21:49 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2020-08-18 21:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-19 4:43 ` Chandan Babu R
2020-08-14 8:08 ` [PATCH V2 03/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when deleting an extent Chandan Babu R
2020-08-14 8:08 ` [PATCH V2 04/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when adding/removing xattrs Chandan Babu R
2020-08-14 8:08 ` [PATCH V2 05/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when adding/removing dir entries Chandan Babu R
2020-08-14 8:08 ` [PATCH V2 06/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when writing to unwritten extent Chandan Babu R
2020-08-14 8:08 ` [PATCH V2 07/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when inserting a hole Chandan Babu R
2020-08-14 8:08 ` [PATCH V2 08/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when moving extent from cow to data fork Chandan Babu R
2020-08-18 22:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-19 5:04 ` Chandan Babu R
2020-08-14 8:08 ` [PATCH V2 09/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when remapping an extent Chandan Babu R
2020-08-14 8:08 ` [PATCH V2 10/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when swapping extents Chandan Babu R
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200818214933.GB21744@dread.disaster.area \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=chandanrlinux@gmail.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox