From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] xfs: updating i_next_unlinked doesn't need to return old value
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 17:19:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200819001928.GV6096@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200812092556.2567285-9-david@fromorbit.com>
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 07:25:51PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> We already know what the next inode in the unlinked list is supposed
> to be from the in-memory list, so we do not need to look it up first
> from the current inode to be able to update in memory list
> pointers...
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 63 +++++++++++-----------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> index bacd5ae9f5a7..4dde1970f7cd 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> @@ -1998,13 +1998,11 @@ xfs_iunlink_update_inode(
> struct xfs_trans *tp,
> struct xfs_inode *ip,
> xfs_agnumber_t agno,
> - xfs_agino_t next_agino,
> - xfs_agino_t *old_next_agino)
> + xfs_agino_t next_agino)
> {
> struct xfs_mount *mp = tp->t_mountp;
> struct xfs_dinode *dip;
> struct xfs_buf *ibp;
> - xfs_agino_t old_value;
> int error;
>
> ASSERT(xfs_verify_agino_or_null(mp, agno, next_agino));
> @@ -2013,37 +2011,10 @@ xfs_iunlink_update_inode(
> if (error)
> return error;
>
> - /* Make sure the old pointer isn't garbage. */
> - old_value = be32_to_cpu(dip->di_next_unlinked);
> - if (!xfs_verify_agino_or_null(mp, agno, old_value)) {
> - xfs_inode_verifier_error(ip, -EFSCORRUPTED, __func__, dip,
> - sizeof(*dip), __this_address);
> - error = -EFSCORRUPTED;
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * Since we're updating a linked list, we should never find that the
> - * current pointer is the same as the new value, unless we're
> - * terminating the list.
> - */
> - *old_next_agino = old_value;
> - if (old_value == next_agino) {
> - if (next_agino != NULLAGINO) {
> - xfs_inode_verifier_error(ip, -EFSCORRUPTED, __func__,
> - dip, sizeof(*dip), __this_address);
> - error = -EFSCORRUPTED;
> - }
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> /* Ok, update the new pointer. */
> xfs_iunlink_update_dinode(tp, agno, XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, ip->i_ino),
> ibp, dip, &ip->i_imap, next_agino);
> return 0;
> -out:
> - xfs_trans_brelse(tp, ibp);
> - return error;
> }
>
> static int
> @@ -2079,19 +2050,15 @@ xfs_iunlink_insert_inode(
> nip = list_first_entry_or_null(&agibp->b_pag->pag_ici_unlink_list,
> struct xfs_inode, i_unlink);
> if (nip) {
> - xfs_agino_t old_agino;
> -
> ASSERT(next_agino == XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, nip->i_ino));
>
> /*
> * There is already another inode in the bucket, so point this
> * inode to the current head of the list.
> */
> - error = xfs_iunlink_update_inode(tp, ip, agno, next_agino,
> - &old_agino);
> + error = xfs_iunlink_update_inode(tp, ip, agno, next_agino);
> if (error)
> return error;
> - ASSERT(old_agino == NULLAGINO);
> } else {
> ASSERT(next_agino == NULLAGINO);
> }
> @@ -2149,7 +2116,7 @@ xfs_iunlink_remove_inode(
> struct xfs_agi *agi;
> xfs_agino_t agino = XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, ip->i_ino);
> xfs_agnumber_t agno = XFS_INO_TO_AGNO(mp, ip->i_ino);
> - xfs_agino_t next_agino;
> + xfs_agino_t next_agino = NULLAGINO;
> xfs_agino_t head_agino;
> int error;
>
> @@ -2169,23 +2136,21 @@ xfs_iunlink_remove_inode(
> }
>
> /*
> - * Set our inode's next_unlinked pointer to NULL and then return
> - * the old pointer value so that we can update whatever was previous
> - * to us in the list to point to whatever was next in the list.
> + * Get the next agino in the list. If we are at the end of the list,
> + * then the previous inode's i_next_unlinked filed will get cleared.
"field"
With that fixed,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
--D
> */
> - error = xfs_iunlink_update_inode(tp, ip, agno, NULLAGINO, &next_agino);
> + if (ip != list_last_entry(&agibp->b_pag->pag_ici_unlink_list,
> + struct xfs_inode, i_unlink)) {
> + struct xfs_inode *nip = list_next_entry(ip, i_unlink);
> +
> + next_agino = XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, nip->i_ino);
> + }
> +
> + /* Clear the on disk next unlinked pointer for this inode. */
> + error = xfs_iunlink_update_inode(tp, ip, agno, NULLAGINO);
> if (error)
> return error;
>
> -#ifdef DEBUG
> - {
> - struct xfs_inode *nip = list_next_entry(ip, i_unlink);
> - if (nip)
> - ASSERT(next_agino == XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, nip->i_ino));
> - else
> - ASSERT(next_agino == NULLAGINO);
> - }
> -#endif
>
> if (ip != list_first_entry(&agibp->b_pag->pag_ici_unlink_list,
> struct xfs_inode, i_unlink)) {
> --
> 2.26.2.761.g0e0b3e54be
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-19 0:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-12 9:25 [PATCH 00/13] xfs: in memory inode unlink log items Dave Chinner
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 01/13] xfs: xfs_iflock is no longer a completion Dave Chinner
2020-08-18 23:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-22 7:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 02/13] xfs: add log item precommit operation Dave Chinner
2020-08-22 9:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 03/13] xfs: factor the xfs_iunlink functions Dave Chinner
2020-08-18 23:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-22 7:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 04/13] xfs: arrange all unlinked inodes into one list Dave Chinner
2020-08-18 23:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-19 0:45 ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-19 0:58 ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-22 9:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-23 17:24 ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-24 8:19 ` [RFC PATCH] xfs: use log_incompat feature instead of speculate matching Gao Xiang
2020-08-24 8:34 ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-24 15:08 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-24 15:41 ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-25 10:06 ` [PATCH] " Gao Xiang
2020-08-25 14:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-25 15:30 ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-27 7:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 05/13] xfs: add unlink list pointers to xfs_inode Dave Chinner
2020-08-19 0:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-19 0:47 ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-22 9:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-25 5:17 ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-27 7:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 06/13] xfs: replace iunlink backref lookups with list lookups Dave Chinner
2020-08-19 0:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-19 0:52 ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 07/13] xfs: mapping unlinked inodes is now redundant Dave Chinner
2020-08-19 0:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 08/13] xfs: updating i_next_unlinked doesn't need to return old value Dave Chinner
2020-08-19 0:19 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 09/13] xfs: validate the unlinked list pointer on update Dave Chinner
2020-08-19 0:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 10/13] xfs: re-order AGI updates in unlink list updates Dave Chinner
2020-08-19 0:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-19 1:01 ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 11/13] xfs: combine iunlink inode update functions Dave Chinner
2020-08-19 0:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 12/13] xfs: add in-memory iunlink log item Dave Chinner
2020-08-19 0:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-12 9:25 ` [PATCH 13/13] xfs: reorder iunlink remove operation in xfs_ifree Dave Chinner
2020-08-12 11:12 ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-19 0:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-18 18:17 ` [PATCH 00/13] xfs: in memory inode unlink log items Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-18 20:01 ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-18 21:42 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200819001928.GV6096@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox