From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] xfs: fix boundary test in xfs_attr_shortform_verify
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 09:44:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200826164420.GP6096@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <689c4eda-dd80-c1bd-843f-1b485bfddc5a@redhat.com>
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:19:54AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> The boundary test for the fixed-offset parts of xfs_attr_sf_entry in
> xfs_attr_shortform_verify is off by one, because the variable array
> at the end is defined as nameval[1] not nameval[].
> Hence we need to subtract 1 from the calculation.
>
> This can be shown by:
>
> # touch file
> # setfattr -n root.a file
>
> and verifications will fail when it's written to disk.
>
> This only matters for a last attribute which has a single-byte name
> and no value, otherwise the combination of namelen & valuelen will
> push endp further out and this test won't fail.
>
> Fixes: 1e1bbd8e7ee06 ("xfs: create structure verifier function for shortform xattrs")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Looks ok.
From whom should I be expecting a test case?
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
--D
> ---
>
> V2: Add whitespace and comments, tweak commit log.
>
> Note: as Darrick points out, this should be made consistent w/ the dir2 arrays
> by making the nameval variable size array [] not [1], and then we can lose all
> the -1 magic sprinkled around. At that time we should probably also make the
> macros into proper functions, as was done for dir2.
>
> For now, this is just the least invasive fixup for the problem at hand.
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
> index 8623c815164a..383b08f2ac61 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
> @@ -1036,8 +1036,10 @@ xfs_attr_shortform_verify(
> * struct xfs_attr_sf_entry has a variable length.
> * Check the fixed-offset parts of the structure are
> * within the data buffer.
> + * xfs_attr_sf_entry is defined with a 1-byte variable
> + * array at the end, so we must subtract that off.
> */
> - if (((char *)sfep + sizeof(*sfep)) >= endp)
> + if (((char *)sfep + sizeof(*sfep) - 1) >= endp)
> return __this_address;
>
> /* Don't allow names with known bad length. */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-26 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-25 20:25 [PATCH] xfs: fix boundary test in xfs_attr_shortform_verify Eric Sandeen
2020-08-25 20:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-25 22:41 ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-26 14:32 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-08-26 15:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-26 15:39 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-08-26 15:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-27 8:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-26 16:19 ` [PATCH V2] " Eric Sandeen
2020-08-26 16:44 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-08-26 17:07 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-09-01 12:59 ` Pavel Reichl
2020-08-27 8:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-27 13:43 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200826164420.GP6096@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox