public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs: Use variable-size array for nameval in xfs_attr_sf_entry
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:31:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200831153126.GA6096@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200831130423.136509-2-cmaiolino@redhat.com>

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 03:04:20PM +0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> nameval is a variable-size array, so, define it as it, and remove all
> the -1 magic number subtractions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c | 6 ++----
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_sf.h   | 6 +++---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_da_format.h | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
> index 305d4bc073370..7bbc97e0e4d4a 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
> @@ -992,7 +992,7 @@ xfs_attr_shortform_allfit(
>  			return 0;
>  		if (be16_to_cpu(name_loc->valuelen) >= XFS_ATTR_SF_ENTSIZE_MAX)
>  			return 0;
> -		bytes += sizeof(struct xfs_attr_sf_entry) - 1
> +		bytes += sizeof(struct xfs_attr_sf_entry)
>  				+ name_loc->namelen
>  				+ be16_to_cpu(name_loc->valuelen);
>  	}
> @@ -1036,10 +1036,8 @@ xfs_attr_shortform_verify(
>  		 * struct xfs_attr_sf_entry has a variable length.
>  		 * Check the fixed-offset parts of the structure are
>  		 * within the data buffer.
> -		 * xfs_attr_sf_entry is defined with a 1-byte variable
> -		 * array at the end, so we must subtract that off.
>  		 */
> -		if (((char *)sfep + sizeof(*sfep) - 1) >= endp)
> +		if (((char *)sfep + sizeof(*sfep)) >= endp)
>  			return __this_address;
>  
>  		/* Don't allow names with known bad length. */
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_sf.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_sf.h
> index bb004fb7944a7..d93012a0be4d0 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_sf.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_sf.h
> @@ -28,11 +28,11 @@ typedef struct xfs_attr_sf_sort {
>  } xfs_attr_sf_sort_t;
>  
>  #define XFS_ATTR_SF_ENTSIZE_BYNAME(nlen,vlen)	/* space name/value uses */ \
> -	(((int)sizeof(xfs_attr_sf_entry_t)-1 + (nlen)+(vlen)))
> +	(((int)sizeof(xfs_attr_sf_entry_t) + (nlen)+(vlen)))
>  #define XFS_ATTR_SF_ENTSIZE_MAX			/* max space for name&value */ \
> -	((1 << (NBBY*(int)sizeof(uint8_t))) - 1)
> +	(1 << (NBBY*(int)sizeof(uint8_t)))

The maximum space for the name and value is still UINT8_MAX, right?
I don't think this should change to 256.

I also kind of wonder if this should also get changed to be more
direct:

#define XFS_ATTR_SF_ENTSIZE_MAX		(UINT8_MAX)

but it's working code, we could/should just leave it be...

>  #define XFS_ATTR_SF_ENTSIZE(sfep)		/* space an entry uses */ \
> -	((int)sizeof(xfs_attr_sf_entry_t)-1 + (sfep)->namelen+(sfep)->valuelen)
> +	((int)sizeof(xfs_attr_sf_entry_t) + (sfep)->namelen+(sfep)->valuelen)

Can this (and ENTSIZE_BYNAME) use struct_sizeof?

--D

>  #define XFS_ATTR_SF_NEXTENTRY(sfep)		/* next entry in struct */ \
>  	((xfs_attr_sf_entry_t *)((char *)(sfep) + XFS_ATTR_SF_ENTSIZE(sfep)))
>  #define XFS_ATTR_SF_TOTSIZE(dp)			/* total space in use */ \
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_da_format.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_da_format.h
> index 059ac108b1b39..e86185a1165b3 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_da_format.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_da_format.h
> @@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ typedef struct xfs_attr_shortform {
>  		uint8_t namelen;	/* actual length of name (no NULL) */
>  		uint8_t valuelen;	/* actual length of value (no NULL) */
>  		uint8_t flags;	/* flags bits (see xfs_attr_leaf.h) */
> -		uint8_t nameval[1];	/* name & value bytes concatenated */
> +		uint8_t nameval[];	/* name & value bytes concatenated */
>  	} list[1];			/* variable sized array */
>  } xfs_attr_shortform_t;
>  
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-31 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-31 13:04 [PATCH 0/4] Clean up xfs_attr_sf_entry Carlos Maiolino
2020-08-31 13:04 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: Use variable-size array for nameval in xfs_attr_sf_entry Carlos Maiolino
2020-08-31 14:53   ` Eric Sandeen
2020-08-31 14:54     ` Eric Sandeen
2020-08-31 15:31   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-09-02 11:13     ` Carlos Maiolino
2020-08-31 13:04 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: Convert xfs_attr_sf macros to inline functions Carlos Maiolino
2020-08-31 15:34   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-01  7:43     ` Carlos Maiolino
2020-08-31 13:04 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: remove typedef xfs_attr_sf_entry_t Carlos Maiolino
2020-08-31 15:34   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-31 13:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: Remove typedef xfs_attr_shortform_t Carlos Maiolino
2020-08-31 15:35   ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200831153126.GA6096@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=cmaiolino@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox