public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com, hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 05/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when adding/removing dir entries
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 09:41:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200831164126.GN6096@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200820054349.5525-6-chandanrlinux@gmail.com>

On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 11:13:44AM +0530, Chandan Babu R wrote:
> Directory entry addition/removal can cause the following,
> 1. Data block can be added/removed.
>    A new extent can cause extent count to increase by 1.
> 2. Free disk block can be added/removed.
>    Same behaviour as described above for Data block.
> 3. Dabtree blocks.
>    XFS_DA_NODE_MAXDEPTH blocks can be added. Each of these
>    can be new extents. Hence extent count can increase by
>    XFS_DA_NODE_MAXDEPTH.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>

I wonder how long until someone's going to ask us to make
XFS_IEXT_DIR_MANIP_CNT return a number that's more tightly tied to the
actual directory inode in question, but 4 billion extents would already
be pretty egregious, so maybe we don't care...

Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>

--D

> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.h | 12 ++++++++++++
>  fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c             | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  fs/xfs/xfs_symlink.c           |  5 +++++
>  3 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.h
> index aae8e6e80b71..f686c7418d2b 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.h
> @@ -54,6 +54,18 @@ struct xfs_ifork {
>   */
>  #define XFS_IEXT_ATTR_MANIP_CNT(rmt_blks) \
>  	(XFS_DA_NODE_MAXDEPTH + max(1, rmt_blks))
> +/*
> + * Directory entry addition/removal can cause the following,
> + * 1. Data block can be added/removed.
> + *    A new extent can cause extent count to increase by 1.
> + * 2. Free disk block can be added/removed.
> + *    Same behaviour as described above for Data block.
> + * 3. Dabtree blocks.
> + *    XFS_DA_NODE_MAXDEPTH blocks can be added. Each of these can be new
> + *    extents. Hence extent count can increase by XFS_DA_NODE_MAXDEPTH.
> + */
> +#define XFS_IEXT_DIR_MANIP_CNT(mp) \
> +	((XFS_DA_NODE_MAXDEPTH + 1 + 1) * (mp)->m_dir_geo->fsbcount)
>  
>  /*
>   * Fork handling.
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> index 407d6299606d..8d195b6ef326 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> @@ -1175,6 +1175,11 @@ xfs_create(
>  	if (error)
>  		goto out_trans_cancel;
>  
> +	error = xfs_iext_count_may_overflow(dp, XFS_DATA_FORK,
> +			XFS_IEXT_DIR_MANIP_CNT(mp));
> +	if (error)
> +		goto out_trans_cancel;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * A newly created regular or special file just has one directory
>  	 * entry pointing to them, but a directory also the "." entry
> @@ -1391,6 +1396,11 @@ xfs_link(
>  	xfs_trans_ijoin(tp, sip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
>  	xfs_trans_ijoin(tp, tdp, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
>  
> +	error = xfs_iext_count_may_overflow(tdp, XFS_DATA_FORK,
> +			XFS_IEXT_DIR_MANIP_CNT(mp));
> +	if (error)
> +		goto error_return;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * If we are using project inheritance, we only allow hard link
>  	 * creation in our tree when the project IDs are the same; else
> @@ -2861,6 +2871,11 @@ xfs_remove(
>  	xfs_trans_ijoin(tp, dp, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
>  	xfs_trans_ijoin(tp, ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
>  
> +	error = xfs_iext_count_may_overflow(dp, XFS_DATA_FORK,
> +			XFS_IEXT_DIR_MANIP_CNT(mp));
> +	if (error)
> +		goto out_trans_cancel;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * If we're removing a directory perform some additional validation.
>  	 */
> @@ -3221,6 +3236,18 @@ xfs_rename(
>  	if (wip)
>  		xfs_trans_ijoin(tp, wip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
>  
> +	error = xfs_iext_count_may_overflow(src_dp, XFS_DATA_FORK,
> +			XFS_IEXT_DIR_MANIP_CNT(mp));
> +	if (error)
> +		goto out_trans_cancel;
> +
> +	if (target_ip == NULL) {
> +		error = xfs_iext_count_may_overflow(target_dp, XFS_DATA_FORK,
> +				XFS_IEXT_DIR_MANIP_CNT(mp));
> +		if (error)
> +			goto out_trans_cancel;
> +	}
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * If we are using project inheritance, we only allow renames
>  	 * into our tree when the project IDs are the same; else the
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_symlink.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_symlink.c
> index 8e88a7ca387e..581a4032a817 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_symlink.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_symlink.c
> @@ -220,6 +220,11 @@ xfs_symlink(
>  	if (error)
>  		goto out_trans_cancel;
>  
> +	error = xfs_iext_count_may_overflow(dp, XFS_DATA_FORK,
> +			XFS_IEXT_DIR_MANIP_CNT(mp));
> +	if (error)
> +		goto out_trans_cancel;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Allocate an inode for the symlink.
>  	 */
> -- 
> 2.28.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-31 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-20  5:43 [PATCH V3 00/10] Bail out if transaction can cause extent count to overflow Chandan Babu R
2020-08-20  5:43 ` [PATCH V3 01/10] xfs: Add helper for checking per-inode extent count overflow Chandan Babu R
2020-08-31 16:08   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-31 16:44     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-01  9:44       ` Chandan Babu R
2020-08-20  5:43 ` [PATCH V3 02/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when trivally adding a new extent Chandan Babu R
2020-08-31 16:12   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-20  5:43 ` [PATCH V3 03/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when deleting an extent Chandan Babu R
2020-08-31 16:34   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-01  9:44     ` Chandan Babu R
2020-08-20  5:43 ` [PATCH V3 04/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when adding/removing xattrs Chandan Babu R
2020-08-31 16:37   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-01  9:44     ` Chandan Babu R
2020-08-20  5:43 ` [PATCH V3 05/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when adding/removing dir entries Chandan Babu R
2020-08-31 16:41   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-08-20  5:43 ` [PATCH V3 06/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when writing to unwritten extent Chandan Babu R
2020-08-31 16:45   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-20  5:43 ` [PATCH V3 07/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when inserting a hole Chandan Babu R
2020-08-31 16:46   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-01  9:44     ` Chandan Babu R
2020-08-20  5:43 ` [PATCH V3 08/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when moving extent from cow to data fork Chandan Babu R
2020-08-31 16:29   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-01  9:45     ` Chandan Babu R
2020-08-20  5:43 ` [PATCH V3 09/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when remapping an extent Chandan Babu R
2020-08-31 16:23   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-01  9:45     ` Chandan Babu R
2020-08-20  5:43 ` [PATCH V3 10/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when swapping extents Chandan Babu R
2020-08-31 16:20   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-01  9:45     ` Chandan Babu R

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200831164126.GN6096@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=chandanrlinux@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox