linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/13] xfs: reuse _xfs_buf_read for re-reading the superblock
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 08:43:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200901064346.GA29057@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200831204033.GV6107@magnolia>

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 01:40:33PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:

[fullquote deleted..]

> > +	error = _xfs_buf_read(bp, XBF_READ, &xfs_sb_buf_ops);
> 
> Question: xfs_getsb() returns mp->m_sb_bp.  The only place we set that
> variable is in xfs_readsb immediately after setting b_ops by hand.  Is
> there some circumstance where at the end of log recovery, m_sb_bp is set
> to a buffer but that buffer's ops are not set to xfs_sb_buf_ops?
> 
> In other words, do we have to do all this surgery on _xfs_buf_read to
> set the ops?  If they're not set (or worse, set to something else) at
> this point then there's probably something seriously wrong...
> 
> ...possibly my understanding of this buffer. ;)

No, I think your understanding is right.  I've thrown in two more
cleanup patches that helped me following how m_sb_bp is used, and
simplified this one to not need to explicitly passed ops.  Testing now..

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-01  6:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-30  6:14 tidy up the buffer cache implementation v2 Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-30  6:15 ` [PATCH 01/13] xfs: refactor the buf ioend disposition code Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-30  6:15 ` [PATCH 02/13] xfs: mark xfs_buf_ioend static Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-30  6:15 ` [PATCH 03/13] xfs: refactor xfs_buf_ioend Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-30  6:15 ` [PATCH 04/13] xfs: move the buffer retry logic to xfs_buf.c Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-30  6:15 ` [PATCH 05/13] xfs: fold xfs_buf_ioend_finish into xfs_ioend Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-30  6:15 ` [PATCH 06/13] xfs: refactor xfs_buf_ioerror_fail_without_retry Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-30  6:15 ` [PATCH 07/13] xfs: remove xfs_buf_ioerror_retry Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-30  6:15 ` [PATCH 08/13] xfs: lift the XBF_IOEND_FAIL handling into xfs_buf_ioend_disposition Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-30  6:15 ` [PATCH 09/13] xfs: simplify the xfs_buf_ioend_disposition calling convention Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-31 20:26   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-30  6:15 ` [PATCH 10/13] xfs: use xfs_buf_item_relse in xfs_buf_item_done Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-30  6:15 ` [PATCH 11/13] xfs: clear the read/write flags later in xfs_buf_ioend Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-30  6:15 ` [PATCH 12/13] xfs: remove xlog_recover_iodone Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-30  6:15 ` [PATCH 13/13] xfs: reuse _xfs_buf_read for re-reading the superblock Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-31 20:40   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-01  6:43     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-07-09 15:04 tidy up the buffer cache implementation Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-09 15:04 ` [PATCH 13/13] xfs: reuse _xfs_buf_read for re-reading the superblock Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-18 23:02   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-29  6:47     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200901064346.GA29057@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).