From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: log new intent items created as part of finishing recovered intent items
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 10:45:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200917174524.GJ7955@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200917090742.GC13366@infradead.org>
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 10:07:42AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 08:28:49PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> >
> > During a code inspection, I found a serious bug in the log intent item
> > recovery code when an intent item cannot complete all the work and
> > decides to requeue itself to get that done. When this happens, the
> > item recovery creates a new incore deferred op representing the
> > remaining work and attaches it to the transaction that it allocated. At
> > the end of _item_recover, it moves the entire chain of deferred ops to
> > the dummy parent_tp that xlog_recover_process_intents passed to it, but
> > fail to log a new intent item for the remaining work before committing
> > the transaction for the single unit of work.
> >
> > xlog_finish_defer_ops logs those new intent items once recovery has
> > finished dealing with the intent items that it recovered, but this isn't
> > sufficient. If the log is forced to disk after a recovered log item
> > decides to requeue itself and the system goes down before we call
> > xlog_finish_defer_ops, the second log recovery will never see the new
> > intent item and therefore has no idea that there was more work to do.
> > It will finish recovery leaving the filesystem in a corrupted state.
> >
> > The same logic applies to /any/ deferred ops added during intent item
> > recovery, not just the one handling the remaining work.
>
> Looks good:
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>
> I wonder how we could come up with a reliable reproducer for this,
> though..
Yeah, I've never actually seen this trip in practice. I suppose we
could add an error injection point to force the log and bail out midway
through recovery, but that won't help much on unfixed kernels.
--D
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-17 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-17 3:28 [PATCH 0/2] xfs: fix simple problems with log intent recovery Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-17 3:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: log new intent items created as part of finishing recovered intent items Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-17 4:58 ` Dave Chinner
2020-09-17 9:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17 17:45 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-09-17 3:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: attach inode to dquot in xfs_bui_item_recover Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-17 4:54 ` Dave Chinner
2020-09-17 6:36 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-17 7:01 ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-17 8:03 ` Dave Chinner
2020-09-17 9:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17 7:01 ` [PATCH 3/2] xfs: free the intent item when allocating recovery transaction fails Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-17 8:05 ` Dave Chinner
2020-09-17 9:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-18 1:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-18 2:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/2] xfs: fix simple problems with log intent recovery Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-18 2:19 ` [PATCH v3 3/2] xfs: don't release log intent items when recovery fails Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-19 5:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-21 6:49 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200917174524.GJ7955@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox