linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: transaction subsystem quiesce mechanism
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 15:13:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201007221310.GF6540@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201001150310.141467-3-bfoster@redhat.com>

On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 11:03:09AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> The updated quotaoff logging algorithm depends on a runtime quiesce
> of the transaction subsystem to guarantee all transactions after a
> certain point detect quota subsystem changes. Implement this
> mechanism using an internal lock, similar to the external filesystem
> freeze mechanism. This is also somewhat analogous to the old percpu
> transaction counter mechanism, but we don't actually need a counter.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c  |  2 ++
>  fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h |  3 +++
>  fs/xfs/xfs_super.c |  8 ++++++++
>  fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c |  4 ++--
>  fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> index b35611882ff9..214310c94de5 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ xfs_setfilesize_trans_alloc(
>  	 * we released it.
>  	 */
>  	__sb_writers_release(ioend->io_inode->i_sb, SB_FREEZE_FS);
> +	percpu_rwsem_release(&mp->m_trans_rwsem, true, _THIS_IP_);
>  	/*
>  	 * We hand off the transaction to the completion thread now, so
>  	 * clear the flag here.
> @@ -127,6 +128,7 @@ xfs_setfilesize_ioend(
>  	 */
>  	current_set_flags_nested(&tp->t_pflags, PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS);
>  	__sb_writers_acquired(VFS_I(ip)->i_sb, SB_FREEZE_FS);
> +	percpu_rwsem_acquire(&ip->i_mount->m_trans_rwsem, true, _THIS_IP_);
>  
>  	/* we abort the update if there was an IO error */
>  	if (error) {
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> index dfa429b77ee2..f1083a9ce1f8 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> @@ -171,6 +171,9 @@ typedef struct xfs_mount {
>  	 */
>  	struct percpu_counter	m_delalloc_blks;
>  
> +	/* lock for transaction quiesce (used by quotaoff) */
> +	struct percpu_rw_semaphore	m_trans_rwsem;
> +
>  	struct radix_tree_root	m_perag_tree;	/* per-ag accounting info */
>  	spinlock_t		m_perag_lock;	/* lock for m_perag_tree */
>  	uint64_t		m_resblks;	/* total reserved blocks */
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> index baf5de30eebb..ff3ad5392e21 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> @@ -1029,8 +1029,15 @@ xfs_init_percpu_counters(
>  	if (error)
>  		goto free_fdblocks;
>  
> +	/* not a counter, but close enough... */
> +	error = percpu_init_rwsem(&mp->m_trans_rwsem);
> +	if (error)
> +		goto free_delalloc;
> +
>  	return 0;
>  
> +free_delalloc:
> +	percpu_counter_destroy(&mp->m_delalloc_blks);
>  free_fdblocks:
>  	percpu_counter_destroy(&mp->m_fdblocks);
>  free_ifree:
> @@ -1053,6 +1060,7 @@ static void
>  xfs_destroy_percpu_counters(
>  	struct xfs_mount	*mp)
>  {
> +	percpu_free_rwsem(&mp->m_trans_rwsem);
>  	percpu_counter_destroy(&mp->m_icount);
>  	percpu_counter_destroy(&mp->m_ifree);
>  	percpu_counter_destroy(&mp->m_fdblocks);
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> index ca18a040336a..c07fa036549a 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ xfs_trans_free(
>  
>  	trace_xfs_trans_free(tp, _RET_IP_);
>  	if (!(tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_NO_WRITECOUNT))
> -		sb_end_intwrite(tp->t_mountp->m_super);
> +		xfs_trans_end(tp->t_mountp);
>  	xfs_trans_free_dqinfo(tp);
>  	kmem_cache_free(xfs_trans_zone, tp);
>  }
> @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ xfs_trans_alloc(
>  	 */
>  	tp = kmem_cache_zalloc(xfs_trans_zone, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL);
>  	if (!(flags & XFS_TRANS_NO_WRITECOUNT))
> -		sb_start_intwrite(mp->m_super);
> +		xfs_trans_start(mp);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Zero-reservation ("empty") transactions can't modify anything, so
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h
> index f46534b75236..af54c17a22c0 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h
> @@ -209,6 +209,26 @@ xfs_trans_read_buf(
>  				      flags, bpp, ops);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Context tracking helpers for external (i.e. fs freeze) and internal
> + * transaction quiesce.
> + */
> +static inline void
> +xfs_trans_start(
> +	struct xfs_mount	*mp)
> +{
> +	sb_start_intwrite(mp->m_super);
> +	percpu_down_read(&mp->m_trans_rwsem);

/me wonders, have you noticed any extra cpu overhead with this?

So far it looks ok to me, though I wonder if we could skip all this if
CONFIG_XFS_QUOTA=n...

--D

> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +xfs_trans_end(
> +	struct xfs_mount	*mp)
> +{
> +	percpu_up_read(&mp->m_trans_rwsem);
> +	sb_end_intwrite(mp->m_super);
> +}
> +
>  struct xfs_buf	*xfs_trans_getsb(struct xfs_trans *);
>  
>  void		xfs_trans_brelse(xfs_trans_t *, struct xfs_buf *);
> -- 
> 2.25.4
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-07 22:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-01 15:03 [PATCH 0/3] xfs: rework quotaoff to avoid log deadlock Brian Foster
2020-10-01 15:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: skip dquot reservations if quota is inactive Brian Foster
2020-10-07 22:09   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-01 15:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: transaction subsystem quiesce mechanism Brian Foster
2020-10-07 22:13   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-10-08 11:26     ` Brian Foster
2020-10-08 18:27       ` Brian Foster
2020-10-01 15:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: rework quotaoff logging to avoid log deadlock on active fs Brian Foster
2020-10-07 22:24   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-08 11:29     ` Brian Foster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201007221310.GF6540@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).