From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: guaneryu@gmail.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] various: test xfs things fixed in 5.10
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:32:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201027213231.GG5691@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <160382535113.1203387.16777876271740782481.stgit@magnolia>
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 12:02:31PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here are a bunch of new tests for problems that were fixed in 5.10.
> Er.... 5.10 and 5.9. I have not been good at sending to fstests
> upstream lately. :( :(
>
> If you're going to start using this mess, you probably ought to just
> pull from my git trees, which are linked below.
>
> This is an extraordinary way to destroy everything. Enjoy!
> Comments and questions are, as always, welcome.
Hey Darrick, on a slightly different topic, you had mentioned on last
week's ext4 video chat that you had been working on some patches to
allow specific blocks to be forced to return EIO, at specific times,
to test how a file system handles errors when writing to data blocks,
metadata blocks, journal, etc.
Are there early versions of those patches available for us to play
with? I'm interesting in using that infrastructure for adding some
ext4 tests along those lines.
Thanks!!
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-27 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-27 19:02 [PATCH 0/7] various: test xfs things fixed in 5.10 Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-27 19:02 ` [PATCH 1/7] xfs: test fallocate ops when rt extent size is and isn't a power of 2 Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-29 6:13 ` Chandan Babu R
2020-10-27 19:02 ` [PATCH 2/7] xfs: test regression in xfs_bmap_validate_extent Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-29 6:45 ` Chandan Babu R
2020-10-27 19:02 ` [PATCH 3/7] generic: test reflink and copy_file_range behavior with O_SYNC and FS_XFLAG_SYNC files Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-29 9:10 ` Chandan Babu R
2020-10-27 19:02 ` [PATCH 4/7] xfs: test rtalloc alignment and math errors Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-27 19:03 ` [PATCH 5/7] xfs: test mkfs min log size calculation w/ rt volumes Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-27 19:03 ` [PATCH 6/7] xfs: test quota softlimit warning functionality Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-27 19:03 ` [PATCH 7/7] xfs/122: fix test for xfs_attr_shortform_t conversion Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-29 10:12 ` Chandan Babu R
2020-10-29 11:17 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-10-29 18:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-27 21:32 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o [this message]
2020-10-27 22:27 ` [PATCH 0/7] various: test xfs things fixed in 5.10 Darrick J. Wong
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-11-11 0:43 Darrick J. Wong
2020-11-22 14:27 ` Eryu Guan
2020-11-23 18:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201027213231.GG5691@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guaneryu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox