From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A23C55178 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:36:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FCF722275 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:36:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2505967AbgJ0VgB (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:36:01 -0400 Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:41897 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2505925AbgJ0VgB (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:36:01 -0400 Received: from callcc.thunk.org (pool-72-74-133-215.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [72.74.133.215]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 09RLWW2T017202 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:32:32 -0400 Received: by callcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id F0E12420107; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:32:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:32:31 -0400 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: guaneryu@gmail.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] various: test xfs things fixed in 5.10 Message-ID: <20201027213231.GG5691@mit.edu> References: <160382535113.1203387.16777876271740782481.stgit@magnolia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <160382535113.1203387.16777876271740782481.stgit@magnolia> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 12:02:31PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Hi all, > > Here are a bunch of new tests for problems that were fixed in 5.10. > Er.... 5.10 and 5.9. I have not been good at sending to fstests > upstream lately. :( :( > > If you're going to start using this mess, you probably ought to just > pull from my git trees, which are linked below. > > This is an extraordinary way to destroy everything. Enjoy! > Comments and questions are, as always, welcome. Hey Darrick, on a slightly different topic, you had mentioned on last week's ext4 video chat that you had been working on some patches to allow specific blocks to be forced to return EIO, at specific times, to test how a file system handles errors when writing to data blocks, metadata blocks, journal, etc. Are there early versions of those patches available for us to play with? I'm interesting in using that infrastructure for adding some ext4 tests along those lines. Thanks!! - Ted