public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
Cc: sandeen@sandeen.net, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] xfs: remove unnecessary parameter from scrub_scan_estimate_blocks
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 11:33:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201029183308.GW1061252@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201027153350.GC853509@magnolia>

On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 08:33:50AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 10:35:46PM -0700, Allison Henderson wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 10/26/20 4:32 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > > 
> > > The only caller that cares about the file counts uses it to compute the
> > > number of files used, so return that and save a parameter.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > > ---
> > >   scrub/fscounters.c |    8 +++-----
> > >   scrub/fscounters.h |    2 +-
> > >   scrub/phase6.c     |    7 +++----
> > >   scrub/phase7.c     |    5 +----
> > >   4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/scrub/fscounters.c b/scrub/fscounters.c
> > > index e9901fcdf6df..9a240d49477b 100644
> > > --- a/scrub/fscounters.c
> > > +++ b/scrub/fscounters.c
> > > @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ scrub_count_all_inodes(
> > >   }
> > >   /*
> > > - * Estimate the number of blocks and inodes in the filesystem.  Returns 0
> > > + * Estimate the number of blocks and used inodes in the filesystem.  Returns 0
> > >    * or a positive error number.
> > >    */
> > >   int
> > > @@ -126,8 +126,7 @@ scrub_scan_estimate_blocks(
> > >   	unsigned long long		*d_bfree,
> > >   	unsigned long long		*r_blocks,
> > >   	unsigned long long		*r_bfree,
> > > -	unsigned long long		*f_files,
> > > -	unsigned long long		*f_free)
> > > +	unsigned long long		*f_files_used)
> > >   {
> > >   	struct xfs_fsop_counts		fc;
> > >   	int				error;
> > > @@ -141,8 +140,7 @@ scrub_scan_estimate_blocks(
> > >   	*d_bfree = fc.freedata;
> > >   	*r_blocks = ctx->mnt.fsgeom.rtblocks;
> > >   	*r_bfree = fc.freertx;
> > > -	*f_files = fc.allocino;
> > > -	*f_free = fc.freeino;
> > > +	*f_files_used = fc.allocino - fc.freeino;
> > Just a nit, I think I might have put in:
> > 	if(f_files_used)
> > 		*f_files_used = fc.allocino - fc.freeino;
> > 
> > That way calling functions that don't care can just pass NULL, instead of
> > declaring a "dontcare" variable that has no other use.  Though I suppose
> > none of the other variables do that.
> 
> <shrug> There's only two callers, and they both pass a pointer, so I
> didn't bother...

...and one of those callers is to a dontcare variable; and that's what
you were talking about.

Er... I don't mind changing it, but I'll leave that to Eric's
discretion.

--D

> --D
> 
> > Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
> > Allison
> > >   	return 0;
> > >   }
> > > diff --git a/scrub/fscounters.h b/scrub/fscounters.h
> > > index 1fae58a6b287..13bd9967f004 100644
> > > --- a/scrub/fscounters.h
> > > +++ b/scrub/fscounters.h
> > > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
> > >   int scrub_scan_estimate_blocks(struct scrub_ctx *ctx,
> > >   		unsigned long long *d_blocks, unsigned long long *d_bfree,
> > >   		unsigned long long *r_blocks, unsigned long long *r_bfree,
> > > -		unsigned long long *f_files, unsigned long long *f_free);
> > > +		unsigned long long *f_files_used);
> > >   int scrub_count_all_inodes(struct scrub_ctx *ctx, uint64_t *count);
> > >   #endif /* XFS_SCRUB_FSCOUNTERS_H_ */
> > > diff --git a/scrub/phase6.c b/scrub/phase6.c
> > > index 8d976732d8e1..87828b60fbed 100644
> > > --- a/scrub/phase6.c
> > > +++ b/scrub/phase6.c
> > > @@ -719,12 +719,11 @@ phase6_estimate(
> > >   	unsigned long long	d_bfree;
> > >   	unsigned long long	r_blocks;
> > >   	unsigned long long	r_bfree;
> > > -	unsigned long long	f_files;
> > > -	unsigned long long	f_free;
> > > +	unsigned long long	dontcare;
> > >   	int			ret;
> > > -	ret = scrub_scan_estimate_blocks(ctx, &d_blocks, &d_bfree,
> > > -				&r_blocks, &r_bfree, &f_files, &f_free);
> > > +	ret = scrub_scan_estimate_blocks(ctx, &d_blocks, &d_bfree, &r_blocks,
> > > +			&r_bfree, &dontcare);
> > >   	if (ret) {
> > >   		str_liberror(ctx, ret, _("estimating verify work"));
> > >   		return ret;
> > > diff --git a/scrub/phase7.c b/scrub/phase7.c
> > > index 96876f7c0596..bc652ab6f44a 100644
> > > --- a/scrub/phase7.c
> > > +++ b/scrub/phase7.c
> > > @@ -111,8 +111,6 @@ phase7_func(
> > >   	unsigned long long	d_bfree;
> > >   	unsigned long long	r_blocks;
> > >   	unsigned long long	r_bfree;
> > > -	unsigned long long	f_files;
> > > -	unsigned long long	f_free;
> > >   	bool			complain;
> > >   	int			ip;
> > >   	int			error;
> > > @@ -160,7 +158,7 @@ phase7_func(
> > >   	}
> > >   	error = scrub_scan_estimate_blocks(ctx, &d_blocks, &d_bfree, &r_blocks,
> > > -			&r_bfree, &f_files, &f_free);
> > > +			&r_bfree, &used_files);
> > >   	if (error) {
> > >   		str_liberror(ctx, error, _("estimating verify work"));
> > >   		return error;
> > > @@ -177,7 +175,6 @@ phase7_func(
> > >   	/* Report on what we found. */
> > >   	used_data = cvt_off_fsb_to_b(&ctx->mnt, d_blocks - d_bfree);
> > >   	used_rt = cvt_off_fsb_to_b(&ctx->mnt, r_blocks - r_bfree);
> > > -	used_files = f_files - f_free;
> > >   	stat_data = totalcount.dbytes;
> > >   	stat_rt = totalcount.rbytes;
> > > 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-29 18:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-26 23:31 [PATCH 0/5] xfsprogs: fixes for 5.10 Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-26 23:31 ` [PATCH 1/5] mkfs: allow users to specify rtinherit=0 Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-27  5:35   ` Allison Henderson
2020-10-27 17:22   ` Eric Sandeen
2020-10-27 17:24   ` [PATCH 1.5/5] mkfs: clarify valid "inherit" option values Eric Sandeen
2020-10-27 17:40     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-27 17:49       ` Eric Sandeen
2020-10-28  7:32         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-27 17:50     ` [PATCH 1.5/5 V2] " Eric Sandeen
2020-10-27 18:37       ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-28  7:32   ` [PATCH 1/5] mkfs: allow users to specify rtinherit=0 Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-26 23:32 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs: remove unnecessary parameter from scrub_scan_estimate_blocks Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-27  5:35   ` Allison Henderson
2020-10-27 15:33     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-29 18:33       ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-10-29 18:38         ` Allison Henderson
2020-10-28  7:33   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-26 23:32 ` [PATCH 3/5] xfs_db: report ranges of invalid rt blocks Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-27  5:35   ` Allison Henderson
2020-10-28  7:33   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-26 23:32 ` [PATCH 4/5] xfs_repair: skip the rmap and refcount btree checks when the levels are garbage Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-27  5:35   ` Allison Henderson
2020-10-28  7:34   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-26 23:32 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs_repair: correctly detect partially written extents Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-27  5:52   ` Allison Henderson
2020-10-28  7:35   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201029183308.GW1061252@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=allison.henderson@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox