From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: sandeen@sandeen.net, david@fromorbit.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: move kernel-specific superblock validation out of libxfs
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 12:17:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201207171729.GE1585352@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <160729616682.1606994.13360186718552701085.stgit@magnolia>
On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 03:09:26PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
>
> A couple of the superblock validation checks apply only to the kernel,
> so move them to xfs_fc_fill_super before we add the needsrepair "feature",
> which will prevent the kernel (but not xfsprogs) from mounting the
> filesystem. This also reduces the diff between kernel and userspace
> libxfs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c | 27 ---------------------------
> fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> index 5aeafa59ed27..05359690aaed 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> @@ -382,17 +382,6 @@ xfs_validate_sb_common(
> return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * Until this is fixed only page-sized or smaller data blocks work.
> - */
> - if (unlikely(sbp->sb_blocksize > PAGE_SIZE)) {
> - xfs_warn(mp,
> - "File system with blocksize %d bytes. "
> - "Only pagesize (%ld) or less will currently work.",
> - sbp->sb_blocksize, PAGE_SIZE);
> - return -ENOSYS;
> - }
> -
> /*
> * Currently only very few inode sizes are supported.
> */
> @@ -408,22 +397,6 @@ xfs_validate_sb_common(
> return -ENOSYS;
> }
>
> - if (xfs_sb_validate_fsb_count(sbp, sbp->sb_dblocks) ||
> - xfs_sb_validate_fsb_count(sbp, sbp->sb_rblocks)) {
> - xfs_warn(mp,
> - "file system too large to be mounted on this system.");
> - return -EFBIG;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * Don't touch the filesystem if a user tool thinks it owns the primary
> - * superblock. mkfs doesn't clear the flag from secondary supers, so
> - * we don't check them at all.
> - */
> - if (XFS_BUF_ADDR(bp) == XFS_SB_DADDR && sbp->sb_inprogress) {
> - xfs_warn(mp, "Offline file system operation in progress!");
> - return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> - }
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> index e3e229e52512..599566c1a3b4 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> @@ -1467,6 +1467,38 @@ xfs_fc_fill_super(
> #endif
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Don't touch the filesystem if a user tool thinks it owns the primary
> + * superblock. mkfs doesn't clear the flag from secondary supers, so
> + * we don't check them at all.
> + */
> + if (mp->m_sb.sb_inprogress) {
> + xfs_warn(mp, "Offline file system operation in progress!");
> + error = -EFSCORRUPTED;
> + goto out_free_sb;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Until this is fixed only page-sized or smaller data blocks work.
> + */
> + if (mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize > PAGE_SIZE) {
> + xfs_warn(mp,
> + "File system with blocksize %d bytes. "
> + "Only pagesize (%ld) or less will currently work.",
> + mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize, PAGE_SIZE);
> + error = -ENOSYS;
> + goto out_free_sb;
> + }
> +
> + /* Ensure this filesystem fits in the page cache limits */
> + if (xfs_sb_validate_fsb_count(&mp->m_sb, mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks) ||
> + xfs_sb_validate_fsb_count(&mp->m_sb, mp->m_sb.sb_rblocks)) {
> + xfs_warn(mp,
> + "file system too large to be mounted on this system.");
> + error = -EFBIG;
> + goto out_free_sb;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * XFS block mappings use 54 bits to store the logical block offset.
> * This should suffice to handle the maximum file size that the VFS
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-07 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-06 23:09 [PATCH v2 0/3] xfs: add the ability to flag a fs for repair Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-06 23:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: move kernel-specific superblock validation out of libxfs Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-06 23:47 ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-07 17:17 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2020-12-09 17:08 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-12-09 18:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-06 23:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: define a new "needrepair" feature Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-06 23:47 ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-09 17:15 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-12-09 18:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-09 18:10 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-09 18:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-06 23:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: enable the needsrepair feature Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-06 23:48 ` Dave Chinner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-12-01 3:37 [PATCH 0/3] xfs: add the ability to flag a fs for repair Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-01 3:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: move kernel-specific superblock validation out of libxfs Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-01 16:17 ` Brian Foster
2020-12-04 20:35 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-12-04 21:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-04 21:46 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-12-04 23:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-04 23:29 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201207171729.GE1585352@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox