public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic/388: randomly recover via read-only mounts
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 10:34:24 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210104183424.GA6919@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201217145941.2513069-1-bfoster@redhat.com>

On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 09:59:41AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> XFS has an issue where superblock counters may not be properly
> synced when recovery occurs via a read-only mount. This causes the
> filesystem to become inconsistent after unmount. To cover this test
> case, update generic/388 to switch between read-only and read-write
> mounts to perform log recovery.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> ---
> 
> I didn't think it was worth duplicating generic/388 to a whole new test
> just to invoke log recovery from a read-only mount. generic/388 is a
> rather general log recovery test and this preserves historical behavior
> of the test.
> 
> A prospective fix for the issue this reproduces on XFS is posted here:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20201217145334.2512475-1-bfoster@redhat.com/
> 
> Brian
> 
>  tests/generic/388 | 10 ++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/generic/388 b/tests/generic/388
> index 451a6be2..cdd547f4 100755
> --- a/tests/generic/388
> +++ b/tests/generic/388
> @@ -66,8 +66,14 @@ for i in $(seq 1 $((50 * TIME_FACTOR)) ); do
>  		ps -e | grep fsstress > /dev/null 2>&1
>  	done
>  
> -	# quit if mount fails so we don't shutdown the host fs
> -	_scratch_cycle_mount || _fail "cycle mount failed"
> +	# Toggle between rw and ro mounts for recovery. Quit if any mount
> +	# attempt fails so we don't shutdown the host fs.
> +	if [ $((RANDOM % 2)) -eq 0 ]; then
> +		_scratch_cycle_mount || _fail "cycle mount failed"
> +	else
> +		_scratch_cycle_mount "ro" || _fail "cycle ro mount failed"
> +		_scratch_cycle_mount || _fail "cycle mount failed"

I would change that third failure message to something distinct, like:

_fail "cycle remount failed"

To give us extra clues as to which branch encountered failure.
This looks like a fun way to find new bugs. :)

--D

> +	fi
>  done
>  
>  # success, all done
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-04 18:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-17 14:59 [PATCH] generic/388: randomly recover via read-only mounts Brian Foster
2021-01-04 18:34 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2021-01-05 11:54   ` Brian Foster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210104183424.GA6919@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox