From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>, Pavel Reichl <preichl@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Remove mrlock
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 11:27:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210113112744.GA1474691@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210113111707.756662-1-nborisov@suse.com>
Pavel has looked into this before and got stuck on the allocator
workqueue offloads:
[PATCH v13 0/4] xfs: Remove wrappers for some semaphores
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 01:17:03PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> This series removes mrlock_t and directly replaces i_lock and i_mmaplock with
> rw_semaphore in xfs_inode. My end game with this is to eventually lift i_mmaplock
> in VFS and use it from there. The necessity for the latter came up since BTRFS
> is also about to get its own private version of i_mmaplock for the same use case.
> This will mean that all 3 major filesystems on linux (ext4/xfs/btrfs) wil share
> the same lock. Christoph naturally suggested for the lock to be lifted to VFS.
>
> Before proceeding with this work I'd like to get the opinion of XFS developers
> whether doing that is acceptable for them. I've heard that Dave wants to eventually
> convert the mmapsem to a range lock for XFS and implement a callback mechanism
> for VFS to call into every filesystem...
>
> I've only compile tested this and also the way the rwsem is checked for write
> is admittedly a bit hackish but it can easily be changed to utilize lockdep.
> I'm aware of https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20201102194135.174806-1-preichl@redhat.com/
> but frankly that series went too far up to rev 10 which is a bit mind boggling...
>
> Nikolay Borisov (3):
> xfs: Add is_rwsem_write_locked function
> xfs: Convert i_lock/i_mmaplock to rw_semaphore
> xfs: Remove mrlock
>
> fs/xfs/mrlock.h | 78 ----------------------------------------
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 48 ++++++++++++++-----------
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h | 6 ++--
> fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h | 1 -
> fs/xfs/xfs_qm_syscalls.c | 2 +-
> fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 7 ++--
> 6 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 fs/xfs/mrlock.h
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
---end quoted text---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-13 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-13 11:17 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Remove mrlock Nikolay Borisov
2021-01-13 11:17 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] xfs: Add is_rwsem_write_locked function Nikolay Borisov
2021-01-13 11:17 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] xfs: Convert i_lock/i_mmaplock to rw_semaphore Nikolay Borisov
2021-01-13 11:17 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] xfs: Remove mrlock Nikolay Borisov
2021-01-13 11:17 ` Nikolay Borisov
2021-01-13 11:27 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-01-13 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] " Nikolay Borisov
2021-01-13 12:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-13 12:17 ` Nikolay Borisov
2021-01-20 20:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210113112744.GA1474691@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=preichl@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox