public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, david@fromorbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] xfs: refactor reflink functions to use xfs_trans_alloc_inode
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:23:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210128182306.GH2619139@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <161181371557.1523592.14364313318301403930.stgit@magnolia>

On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 10:01:55PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> 
> The two remaining callers of xfs_trans_reserve_quota_nblks are in the
> reflink code.  These conversions aren't as uniform as the previous
> conversions, so call that out in a separate patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> ---

Modulo Christoph's feedback on the locking:

Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>

>  fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c |   58 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
> index 0778b5810c26..ded86cc4764c 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
> @@ -376,16 +376,15 @@ xfs_reflink_allocate_cow(
>  	resblks = XFS_DIOSTRAT_SPACE_RES(mp, resaligned);
>  
>  	xfs_iunlock(ip, *lockmode);
> -	error = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, &M_RES(mp)->tr_write, resblks, 0, 0, &tp);
> -	*lockmode = XFS_ILOCK_EXCL;
> -	xfs_ilock(ip, *lockmode);
>  
> -	if (error)
> +	error = xfs_trans_alloc_inode(ip, &M_RES(mp)->tr_write, resblks, 0,
> +			false, &tp);
> +	if (error) {
> +		/* This function must return with ILOCK_EXCL held. */
> +		*lockmode = XFS_ILOCK_EXCL;
> +		xfs_ilock(ip, *lockmode);
>  		return error;
> -
> -	error = xfs_qm_dqattach_locked(ip, false);
> -	if (error)
> -		goto out_trans_cancel;
> +	}
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Check for an overlapping extent again now that we dropped the ilock.
> @@ -398,12 +397,6 @@ xfs_reflink_allocate_cow(
>  		goto convert;
>  	}
>  
> -	error = xfs_trans_reserve_quota_nblks(tp, ip, resblks, 0, false);
> -	if (error)
> -		goto out_trans_cancel;
> -
> -	xfs_trans_ijoin(tp, ip, 0);
> -
>  	/* Allocate the entire reservation as unwritten blocks. */
>  	nimaps = 1;
>  	error = xfs_bmapi_write(tp, ip, imap->br_startoff, imap->br_blockcount,
> @@ -997,7 +990,7 @@ xfs_reflink_remap_extent(
>  	struct xfs_mount	*mp = ip->i_mount;
>  	struct xfs_trans	*tp;
>  	xfs_off_t		newlen;
> -	int64_t			qres, qdelta;
> +	int64_t			qdelta = 0;
>  	unsigned int		resblks;
>  	bool			smap_real;
>  	bool			dmap_written = xfs_bmap_is_written_extent(dmap);
> @@ -1005,15 +998,22 @@ xfs_reflink_remap_extent(
>  	int			nimaps;
>  	int			error;
>  
> -	/* Start a rolling transaction to switch the mappings */
> +	/*
> +	 * Start a rolling transaction to switch the mappings.
> +	 *
> +	 * Adding a written extent to the extent map can cause a bmbt split,
> +	 * and removing a mapped extent from the extent can cause a bmbt split.
> +	 * The two operations cannot both cause a split since they operate on
> +	 * the same index in the bmap btree, so we only need a reservation for
> +	 * one bmbt split if either thing is happening.  However, we haven't
> +	 * locked the inode yet, so we reserve assuming this is the case.
> +	 */
>  	resblks = XFS_EXTENTADD_SPACE_RES(mp, XFS_DATA_FORK);
> -	error = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, &M_RES(mp)->tr_write, resblks, 0, 0, &tp);
> +	error = xfs_trans_alloc_inode(ip, &M_RES(mp)->tr_write, resblks, 0,
> +			false, &tp);
>  	if (error)
>  		goto out;
>  
> -	xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> -	xfs_trans_ijoin(tp, ip, 0);
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * Read what's currently mapped in the destination file into smap.
>  	 * If smap isn't a hole, we will have to remove it before we can add
> @@ -1061,15 +1061,9 @@ xfs_reflink_remap_extent(
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Compute quota reservation if we think the quota block counter for
> +	 * Increase quota reservation if we think the quota block counter for
>  	 * this file could increase.
>  	 *
> -	 * Adding a written extent to the extent map can cause a bmbt split,
> -	 * and removing a mapped extent from the extent can cause a bmbt split.
> -	 * The two operations cannot both cause a split since they operate on
> -	 * the same index in the bmap btree, so we only need a reservation for
> -	 * one bmbt split if either thing is happening.
> -	 *
>  	 * If we are mapping a written extent into the file, we need to have
>  	 * enough quota block count reservation to handle the blocks in that
>  	 * extent.  We log only the delta to the quota block counts, so if the
> @@ -1083,13 +1077,9 @@ xfs_reflink_remap_extent(
>  	 * before we started.  That should have removed all the delalloc
>  	 * reservations, but we code defensively.
>  	 */
> -	qres = qdelta = 0;
> -	if (smap_real || dmap_written)
> -		qres = XFS_EXTENTADD_SPACE_RES(mp, XFS_DATA_FORK);
> -	if (!smap_real && dmap_written)
> -		qres += dmap->br_blockcount;
> -	if (qres > 0) {
> -		error = xfs_trans_reserve_quota_nblks(tp, ip, qres, 0, false);
> +	if (!smap_real && dmap_written) {
> +		error = xfs_trans_reserve_quota_nblks(tp, ip,
> +				dmap->br_blockcount, 0, false);
>  		if (error)
>  			goto out_cancel;
>  	}
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-28 18:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-28  6:01 [PATCHSET v3 00/13] xfs: minor cleanups of the quota functions Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-28  6:01 ` [PATCH 01/13] xfs: clean up quota reservation callsites Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-28  6:01 ` [PATCH 02/13] xfs: create convenience wrappers for incore quota block reservations Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-28 18:08   ` Brian Foster
2021-01-28  6:01 ` [PATCH 03/13] xfs: remove xfs_trans_unreserve_quota_nblks completely Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-28  9:46   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-28 18:08   ` Brian Foster
2021-01-28  6:01 ` [PATCH 04/13] xfs: clean up icreate quota reservation calls Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-28 18:09   ` Brian Foster
2021-01-28  6:01 ` [PATCH 05/13] xfs: fix up build warnings when quotas are disabled Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-28 18:09   ` Brian Foster
2021-01-28 18:22     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-28 18:23       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-28  6:01 ` [PATCH 06/13] xfs: reserve data and rt quota at the same time Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-28  9:49   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-28 18:01     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-28 18:10   ` Brian Foster
2021-01-28 18:52     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-28  6:01 ` [PATCH 07/13] xfs: refactor common transaction/inode/quota allocation idiom Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-28  9:50   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-28 18:22   ` Brian Foster
2021-01-28  6:01 ` [PATCH 08/13] xfs: allow reservation of rtblocks with xfs_trans_alloc_inode Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-28  9:51   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-28 18:22   ` Brian Foster
2021-01-28  6:01 ` [PATCH 09/13] xfs: refactor reflink functions to use xfs_trans_alloc_inode Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-28  9:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-28 18:06     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-28 18:23   ` Brian Foster [this message]
2021-01-28  6:02 ` [PATCH 10/13] xfs: try worst case space reservation upfront in xfs_reflink_remap_extent Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-28  9:55   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-28 18:23   ` Brian Foster
2021-01-28  6:02 ` [PATCH 11/13] xfs: refactor inode creation transaction/inode/quota allocation idiom Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-28  9:57   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-28 18:18     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-28 18:23   ` Brian Foster
2021-01-28  6:02 ` [PATCH 12/13] xfs: move xfs_qm_vop_chown_reserve to xfs_trans_dquot.c Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-28  9:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-28 18:23   ` Brian Foster
2021-01-28  6:02 ` [PATCH 13/13] xfs: clean up xfs_trans_reserve_quota_chown a bit Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-28 10:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-28 18:23   ` Brian Foster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210128182306.GH2619139@bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox