From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF28C433DB for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 14:31:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F8664F72 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 14:31:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232322AbhBCObF (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2021 09:31:05 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:51543 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232184AbhBCObE (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2021 09:31:04 -0500 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 9CAEB68C4E; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 15:30:18 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 15:30:17 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Christian Brauner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Shaokun Zhang , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, "Darrick J. Wong" Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] xfs: Fix unused variable 'mp' warning Message-ID: <20210203143017.GA28844@lst.de> References: <1612341558-22171-1-git-send-email-zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com> <20210203093037.v2bhmjqrq7n5mlxx@wittgenstein> <20210203124117.GA16923@lst.de> <20210203134734.4oameuq262qdejwl@wittgenstein> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210203134734.4oameuq262qdejwl@wittgenstein> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 02:47:34PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > In the final version of you conversion (after the file_user_ns() > introduction) we simply pass down the fp so the patch needs to be? > > If you're happy with it I can apply it on top. I don't want to rebase > this late. I can also send it separate as a reply in case this too much > in the body of this mail. > > Patch passes cross-compilation for arm64 and native x864-64 and xfstests > pass too: Let's wait for an ACK from Darrick, but I'd be fine with this.