From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/7] xfs: support shrinking unused space in the last AG
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 07:33:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210204123316.GB3716033@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210204091835.GA149518@xiangao.remote.csb>
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 05:18:35PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 01:01:26PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 10:51:46PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > - /* If there are new blocks in the old last AG, extend it. */
> > > > > + /* If there are some blocks in the last AG, resize it. */
> > > > > if (delta) {
> > > >
> > > > This patch added a (nb == mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks) shortcut check at the top
> > > > of the function. Should we ever get to this point with delta == 0? (If
> > > > not, maybe convert it to an assert just to be safe.)
> > >
> > > delta would be changed after xfs_resizefs_init_new_ags() (the original
> > > growfs design is that, I don't want to touch the original logic). that
> > > is why `delta' reflects the last AG delta now...
> > >
> >
> > Oh, I see. Hmm... that's a bit obfuscated and easy to miss. Perhaps the
> > new helper should also include the extend_space() call below to do all
> > of the AG updates in one place. It's not clear to me if we need to keep
> > the growfs perag reservation code where it is. If so, the new helper
> > could take a boolean pointer (instead of delta) that it can set to true
> > if it had to extend the size of the old last AG because the perag res
> > bits don't actually use the delta value. IOW, I think this hunk could
> > look something like the following:
> >
> > bool resetagres = false;
> >
> > if (extend)
> > error = xfs_resizefs_init_new_ags(..., delta, &resetagres);
> > else
> > error = xfs_ag_shrink_space(... -delta);
> > ...
> >
> > if (resetagres) {
> > <do perag res fixups>
> > }
> > ...
> >
> > Hm?
>
> Not quite sure got your point since xfs_resizefs_init_new_ags() is not
> part of the transaction (and no need to). If you mean that the current
> codebase needs some refactor to make the whole growfs operation as a
> new helper, I could do in the next version, but one thing out there is
> there are too many local variables, if we introduce some new helper,
> a new struct argument might be needed.
>
That seems fine either way. I think it's just a matter of passing the
transaction to the function or not. I've appended a diff based on the
previous refactoring patch to demonstrate what I mean (compile tested
only).
> And I have no idea why growfs perag reservation stays at the end of
> the function. My own understanding is that if growfs perag reservation
> here is somewhat racy since no AGI/AGF lock protection it seems.
>
Ok. It's probably best to leave it alone until we figure that out and
then address it in a separate patch, if desired.
Brian
--- 8< ---
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c
index 6c4ab5e31054..707c9379d6c1 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c
@@ -34,19 +34,20 @@
*/
static int
xfs_resizefs_init_new_ags(
- struct xfs_mount *mp,
+ struct xfs_trans *tp,
struct aghdr_init_data *id,
xfs_agnumber_t oagcount,
xfs_agnumber_t nagcount,
- xfs_rfsblock_t *delta)
+ xfs_rfsblock_t delta)
{
- xfs_rfsblock_t nb = mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks + *delta;
+ struct xfs_mount *mp = tp->t_mountp;
+ xfs_rfsblock_t nb = mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks + delta;
int error;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&id->buffer_list);
for (id->agno = nagcount - 1;
id->agno >= oagcount;
- id->agno--, *delta -= id->agsize) {
+ id->agno--, delta -= id->agsize) {
if (id->agno == nagcount - 1)
id->agsize = nb - (id->agno *
@@ -60,7 +61,16 @@ xfs_resizefs_init_new_ags(
return error;
}
}
- return xfs_buf_delwri_submit(&id->buffer_list);
+
+ error = xfs_buf_delwri_submit(&id->buffer_list);
+ if (error)
+ return error;
+
+ xfs_trans_agblocks_delta(tp, id->nfree);
+
+ if (delta)
+ error = xfs_ag_extend_space(mp, tp, id, delta);
+ return error;
}
/*
@@ -117,19 +127,10 @@ xfs_growfs_data_private(
if (error)
return error;
- error = xfs_resizefs_init_new_ags(mp, &id, oagcount, nagcount, &delta);
+ error = xfs_resizefs_init_new_ags(tp, &id, oagcount, nagcount, delta);
if (error)
goto out_trans_cancel;
- xfs_trans_agblocks_delta(tp, id.nfree);
-
- /* If there are new blocks in the old last AG, extend it. */
- if (delta) {
- error = xfs_ag_extend_space(mp, tp, &id, delta);
- if (error)
- goto out_trans_cancel;
- }
-
/*
* Update changed superblock fields transactionally. These are not
* seen by the rest of the world until the transaction commit applies
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-04 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-26 12:56 [PATCH v6 0/7] xfs: support shrinking free space in the last AG Gao Xiang
2021-01-26 12:56 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] xfs: rename `new' to `delta' in xfs_growfs_data_private() Gao Xiang
2021-02-02 19:37 ` Brian Foster
2021-01-26 12:56 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] xfs: get rid of xfs_growfs_{data,log}_t Gao Xiang
2021-02-02 19:37 ` Brian Foster
2021-01-26 12:56 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] xfs: update lazy sb counters immediately for resizefs Gao Xiang
2021-02-02 19:38 ` Brian Foster
2021-02-03 0:45 ` Gao Xiang
2021-01-26 12:56 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] xfs: hoist out xfs_resizefs_init_new_ags() Gao Xiang
2021-02-02 19:38 ` Brian Foster
2021-01-26 12:56 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] xfs: introduce xfs_ag_shrink_space() Gao Xiang
2021-01-26 12:56 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] xfs: support shrinking unused space in the last AG Gao Xiang
2021-02-03 14:23 ` Brian Foster
2021-02-03 14:51 ` Gao Xiang
2021-02-03 18:01 ` Brian Foster
2021-02-04 9:18 ` Gao Xiang
2021-02-04 12:33 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2021-02-04 16:21 ` Gao Xiang
2021-02-03 18:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-02-03 18:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-02-03 19:02 ` Gao Xiang
2021-02-03 19:19 ` Gao Xiang
2021-02-04 12:33 ` Brian Foster
2021-02-04 13:58 ` Gao Xiang
2021-02-04 9:40 ` Gao Xiang
2021-01-26 12:56 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] xfs: add error injection for per-AG resv failure when shrinkfs Gao Xiang
2021-02-03 14:23 ` Brian Foster
2021-02-03 15:01 ` Gao Xiang
2021-02-03 18:01 ` Brian Foster
2021-02-04 9:20 ` Gao Xiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210204123316.GB3716033@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hsiangkao@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox