Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with the pidfd tree

Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-14T22:42:34Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2223 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 10:33:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the xfs tree got a conflict in:
>
> fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
>
> between commit:
>
> f736d93d76d3 ("xfs: support idmapped mounts")
>
> from the pidfd tree and commit:
>
> 7317a03df703 ("xfs: refactor inode ownership change transaction/inode/quota allocation idiom")
>
> from the xfs tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> diff --cc fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> index 3d4c7ca080fb,248083ea0276..000000000000
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> @@@ -1280,9 -1275,9 +1280,10 @@@ xfs_ioctl_setattr_prepare_dax
> */
> static struct xfs_trans *
> xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(
> - struct file *file)
> - struct xfs_inode *ip,
> ++ struct file *file,
> + struct xfs_dquot *pdqp)
> {
> + struct xfs_inode *ip = XFS_I(file_inode(file));
> struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
> struct xfs_trans *tp;
> int error = -EROFS;
> @@@ -1470,9 -1461,9 +1469,9 @@@ xfs_ioctl_setattr
>
> xfs_ioctl_setattr_prepare_dax(ip, fa);
>
> - tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(file);
> - tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(ip, pdqp);
> ++ tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(file, pdqp);
> if (IS_ERR(tp)) {
> - code = PTR_ERR(tp);
> + error = PTR_ERR(tp);
> goto error_free_dquots;
> }
>
> @@@ -1615,7 -1599,7 +1606,7 @@@ xfs_ioc_setxflags
>
> xfs_ioctl_setattr_prepare_dax(ip, &fa);
>
> - tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(filp);
> - tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(ip, NULL);
> ++ tp = xfs_ioctl_setattr_get_trans(filp, NULL);
> if (IS_ERR(tp)) {
> error = PTR_ERR(tp);
> goto out_drop_write;

With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this
conflict still exists.