linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	darrick.wong@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 07/11] xfs: Check for extent overflow when writing to unwritten extent
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 10:05:08 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210303180508.GO7269@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210118062022.15069-8-chandanrlinux@gmail.com>

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 11:50:18AM +0530, Chandan Babu R wrote:
> This test verifies that XFS does not cause inode fork's extent count to
> overflow when writing to an unwritten extent.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
> ---
>  tests/xfs/527     | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/xfs/527.out | 11 ++++++
>  tests/xfs/group   |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 101 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100755 tests/xfs/527
>  create mode 100644 tests/xfs/527.out
> 
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/527 b/tests/xfs/527
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..cd67bce4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/527
> @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2020 Chandan Babu R.  All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test 527
> +#
> +# Verify that XFS does not cause inode fork's extent count to overflow when
> +# writing to an unwritten extent.
> +seq=`basename $0`
> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> +
> +here=`pwd`
> +tmp=/tmp/$$
> +status=1	# failure is the default!
> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> +	cd /
> +	rm -f $tmp.*
> +}
> +
> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> +. ./common/rc
> +. ./common/filter
> +. ./common/inject
> +
> +# remove previous $seqres.full before test
> +rm -f $seqres.full
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +
> +_supported_fs xfs
> +_require_scratch
> +_require_xfs_debug
> +_require_xfs_io_command "falloc"
> +_require_xfs_io_error_injection "reduce_max_iextents"
> +
> +echo "Format and mount fs"
> +_scratch_mkfs_sized $((1024 * 1024 * 1024)) >> $seqres.full
> +_scratch_mount >> $seqres.full
> +
> +bsize=$(_get_file_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT)
> +
> +testfile=${SCRATCH_MNT}/testfile
> +
> +echo "Inject reduce_max_iextents error tag"
> +_scratch_inject_error reduce_max_iextents 1
> +
> +nr_blks=15
> +
> +for io in Buffered Direct; do

# First test buffered writes, then direct writes.
for $xfs_io_flag in "" "-d"; do ?

> +	echo "* $io write to unwritten extent"
> +
> +	echo "Fallocate $nr_blks blocks"
> +	$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "falloc 0 $((nr_blks * bsize))" $testfile >> $seqres.full
> +
> +	if [[ $io == "Buffered" ]]; then
> +		xfs_io_flag=""
> +	else
> +		xfs_io_flag="-d"
> +	fi

...because then you can skip this part.

> +
> +	echo "$io write to every other block of fallocated space"
> +	for i in $(seq 1 2 $((nr_blks - 1))); do
> +		$XFS_IO_PROG -f -s $xfs_io_flag -c "pwrite $((i * bsize)) $bsize" \
> +		       $testfile >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +		[[ $? != 0 ]] && break
> +	done
> +
> +	echo "Verify \$testfile's extent count"
> +	nextents=$($XFS_IO_PROG -c 'stat' $testfile | grep nextents)
> +	nextents=${nextents##fsxattr.nextents = }
> +	if (( $nextents > 10 )); then
> +		echo "Extent count overflow check failed: nextents = $nextents"
> +		exit 1
> +	fi
> +
> +	rm $testfile
> +done
> +
> +# super_block->s_wb_err will have a newer seq value when compared to "/"'s
> +# file->f_sb_err. Consume it here so that xfs_scrub can does not error out.
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -c syncfs $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full 2>&1

I wonder, should _check_xfs_filesystem should syncfs to clear old EIOs
before running xfs_scrub?  I occasionally see this pop up on
generic/204.

(Everything else here looks ok.)

--D

> +
> +# success, all done
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/527.out b/tests/xfs/527.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..3597ad92
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/527.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +QA output created by 527
> +Format and mount fs
> +Inject reduce_max_iextents error tag
> +* Buffered write to unwritten extent
> +Fallocate 15 blocks
> +Buffered write to every other block of fallocated space
> +Verify $testfile's extent count
> +* Direct write to unwritten extent
> +Fallocate 15 blocks
> +Direct write to every other block of fallocated space
> +Verify $testfile's extent count
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/group b/tests/xfs/group
> index d089797b..627813fe 100644
> --- a/tests/xfs/group
> +++ b/tests/xfs/group
> @@ -524,3 +524,4 @@
>  524 auto quick punch zero insert collapse
>  525 auto quick attr
>  526 auto quick dir hardlink symlink
> +527 auto quick
> -- 
> 2.29.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-04  0:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-18  6:20 [PATCH V4 00/11] xfs: Tests to verify inode fork extent count overflow detection Chandan Babu R
2021-01-18  6:20 ` [PATCH V4 01/11] common/xfs: Add a helper to get an inode fork's extent count Chandan Babu R
2021-03-03 17:30   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-05 14:41     ` Chandan Babu R
2021-01-18  6:20 ` [PATCH V4 02/11] xfs: Check for extent overflow when trivally adding a new extent Chandan Babu R
2021-03-03 17:38   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-05 14:42     ` Chandan Babu R
2021-01-18  6:20 ` [PATCH V4 03/11] xfs: Check for extent overflow when growing realtime bitmap/summary inodes Chandan Babu R
2021-03-03 17:45   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-04 11:58     ` Chandan Babu R
2021-03-04 16:17       ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-18  6:20 ` [PATCH V4 04/11] xfs: Check for extent overflow when punching a hole Chandan Babu R
2021-03-03 17:54   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-18  6:20 ` [PATCH V4 05/11] xfs: Check for extent overflow when adding/removing xattrs Chandan Babu R
2021-03-03 17:56   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-18  6:20 ` [PATCH V4 06/11] xfs: Check for extent overflow when adding/removing dir entries Chandan Babu R
2021-03-03 18:01   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-04 12:22     ` Chandan Babu R
2021-01-18  6:20 ` [PATCH V4 07/11] xfs: Check for extent overflow when writing to unwritten extent Chandan Babu R
2021-03-03 18:05   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2021-03-05 14:43     ` Chandan Babu R
2021-01-18  6:20 ` [PATCH V4 08/11] xfs: Check for extent overflow when moving extent from cow to data fork Chandan Babu R
2021-03-03 18:07   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-18  6:20 ` [PATCH V4 09/11] xfs: Check for extent overflow when remapping an extent Chandan Babu R
2021-03-03 18:09   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-18  6:20 ` [PATCH V4 10/11] xfs: Check for extent overflow when swapping extents Chandan Babu R
2021-03-03 18:10   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-18  6:20 ` [PATCH V4 11/11] xfs: Stress test with bmap_alloc_minlen_extent error tag enabled Chandan Babu R
2021-03-03 18:12   ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210303180508.GO7269@magnolia \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=chandanrlinux@gmail.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).