public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, dchinner@redhat.com,
	christian.brauner@ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] xfs: force log and push AIL to clear pinned inodes when aborting mount
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2021 20:47:05 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210308044705.GM3419940@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210307230123.GY4662@dread.disaster.area>

On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 10:01:23AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 12:25:57PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> > 
> > If we allocate quota inodes in the process of mounting a filesystem but
> > then decide to abort the mount, it's possible that the quota inodes are
> > sitting around pinned by the log.  Now that inode reclaim relies on the
> > AIL to flush inodes, we have to force the log and push the AIL in
> > between releasing the quota inodes and kicking off reclaim to tear down
> > all the incore inodes.  Do this by extracting the bits we need from the
> > unmount path and reusing them.
> > 
> > This was originally found during a fuzz test of metadata directories
> > (xfs/1546), but the actual symptom was that reclaim hung up on the quota
> > inodes.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c |  100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> >  1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> 
> Seems reasonable.
> 
> > 
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> > index 52370d0a3f43..556ce373145f 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> > @@ -634,6 +634,57 @@ xfs_check_summary_counts(
> >  	return xfs_initialize_perag_data(mp, mp->m_sb.sb_agcount);
> >  }
> >  
> > +/*
> > + * Force the log contents and checkpoint them into the filesystem, the reclaim
> > + * inodes in preparation to unmount.
> 
> "then reclaim"
> 
> Ignoring the typo, the comment doesn't add anything useful - you're
> saying what the function does, not why. I'd prefer you lift all the
> comments in the code up into the header, explaining why each step
> is needed/taken. Something like:
> 
> /*
>  * Flush and reclaim dirty inodes in preparation for unmount. Inodes and
>  * internal inode structures can be sitting in the CIL and AIL at this point, so
>  * we need to unpin them, write them back and/or reclaim them before unmount can
>  * proceed.
>  *
>  * An inode cluster that has been freed can have its buffer still pinned in
>  * memory because the transaction is still sitting in a iclog. The stale inodes
>  * on that buffer will be pinned to the buffer until the transaction hits the
>  * disk and the callbacks run. Pushing the AIL will skip the stale inodes and
>  * may never see the pinned buffer, so nothing will push out the iclog and unpin
>  * the buffer.
>  *
>  * Hence we need to force the log to unpin everything first. However, log forces
>  * don't wait for the discards they issue to complete, so we have to explicitly
>  * wait for them to complete here as well.
>  *
>  * Then we can tell the world we are unmounting so that error handling knows
>  * that the filesystem is going away and we should error out anything that we
>  * have been retrying in the background.  This will prevent never-ending retries
>  * in AIL pushing from hanging the unmount.
>  *
>  * Finally, we can push the AIL to clean all the remaining dirty objects, then
>  * reclaim the remaining inodes that are still in memory at this point in
>  * time.
>  */

Ok.  Seems good to me.

--D

> static void
> xfs_unmount_flush_inodes(
> 	struct xfs_mount	*mp)
> {
> 	xfs_log_force(mp, XFS_LOG_SYNC);
> 	xfs_extent_busy_wait_all(mp);
> 	flush_workqueue(xfs_discard_wq);
> 
> 	mp->m_flags |= XFS_MOUNT_UNMOUNTING;
> 
> 	xfs_ail_push_all_sync(mp->m_ail);
> 	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&mp->m_reclaim_work);
> 	xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp);
> 	xfs_health_unmount(mp);
> }
> 
> Everything else looks fine.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> 
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-08  4:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-07 20:25 [PATCHSET v2 0/4] xfs: small fixes for 5.12 Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-07 20:25 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: fix quota accounting when a mount is idmapped Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-07 22:28   ` Dave Chinner
2021-03-07 20:25 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: avoid buffer deadlocks when walking fs inodes Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-07 20:36   ` [PATCH v2.1 " Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-07 22:37     ` Dave Chinner
2021-03-08  3:56       ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-08  7:56     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-07 20:25 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: force log and push AIL to clear pinned inodes when aborting mount Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-07 23:01   ` Dave Chinner
2021-03-08  4:47     ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2021-03-08  4:48   ` [PATCH v2.1 " Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-08  9:16     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-08 23:42     ` Dave Chinner
2021-03-08  7:53   ` [PATCH " Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-07 20:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: drop freeze protection when running GETFSMAP Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-07 23:05   ` Dave Chinner
2021-03-08  4:45     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-08  7:55   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210308044705.GM3419940@magnolia \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox