From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [WIP] [RFC PATCH] xfs: add test on shrinking unused space in the last AG
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 18:19:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210310021958.GD3419940@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210310020734.GA4003044@xiangao.remote.csb>
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 10:07:52AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Hi Darrick,
>
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:03:49AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 07:09:09AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> > > This adds a testcase to test shrinking unused space as much
> > > as possible in the last AG with background fsstress workload.
> > >
> > > The expectation is that no crash happens with expected output.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > tests/xfs/522 | 125 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > tests/xfs/522.out | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > tests/xfs/group | 1 +
> > > 3 files changed, 199 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100755 tests/xfs/522
> > > create mode 100644 tests/xfs/522.out
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/522 b/tests/xfs/522
> > > new file mode 100755
> > > index 00000000..e427a33a
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/tests/xfs/522
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
> > > +#! /bin/bash
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > +# Copyright (c) 2020 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> > > +#
> > > +# FS QA Test 522
> > > +#
> > > +# XFS online shrinkfs-while-allocating tests
> > > +#
> > > +# This test attempts to shrink unused space as much as possible with
> > > +# background fsstress workload. It will decrease the shrink size if
> > > +# larger size fails. And totally repeat 6 times.
> > > +#
> > > +seq=`basename $0`
> > > +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> > > +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> > > +
> > > +here=`pwd`
> > > +tmp=/tmp/$$
> > > +status=1 # failure is the default!
> > > +trap "rm -f $tmp.*; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> > > +
> > > +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> > > +. ./common/rc
> > > +. ./common/filter
> > > +
> > > +_create_scratch()
> >
> > Functions in tests do not need to be prefixed with "_" since they're not
> > global symbols.
>
> ok, will fix.
>
> >
> > > +{
> > > + echo "*** mkfs"
> > > + _scratch_mkfs_xfs $@ | tee -a $seqres.full | _filter_mkfs 2>$tmp.mkfs
> > > + . $tmp.mkfs
> > > +
> > > + echo "*** mount"
> > > + if ! _try_scratch_mount 2>/dev/null
> > > + then
> > > + echo "failed to mount $SCRATCH_DEV"
> > > + exit 1
> > > + fi
> > > +
> > > + # fix the reserve block pool to a known size so that the enospc
> > > + # calculations work out correctly.
> > > + _scratch_resvblks 1024 > /dev/null 2>&1
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +_fill_scratch()
> > > +{
> > > + $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "resvsp 0 ${1}" $SCRATCH_MNT/resvfile
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +_stress_scratch()
> > > +{
> > > + procs=3
> > > + nops=1000
> > > + # -w ensures that the only ops are ones which cause write I/O
> > > + FSSTRESS_ARGS=`_scale_fsstress_args -d $SCRATCH_MNT -w -p $procs \
> > > + -n $nops $FSSTRESS_AVOID`
> > > + $FSSTRESS_PROG $FSSTRESS_ARGS >> $seqres.full 2>&1 &
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +# real QA test starts here
> > > +_supported_fs xfs
> > > +_require_scratch
> > > +_require_xfs_io_command "falloc"
> > > +
> > > +rm -f $seqres.full
> > > +_scratch_mkfs_xfs | tee -a $seqres.full | _filter_mkfs 2>$tmp.mkfs
> > > +. $tmp.mkfs # extract blocksize and data size for scratch device
> > > +
> > > +endsize=`expr 125 \* 1048576` # stop after shrinking this big
> > > +[ `expr $endsize / $dbsize` -lt $dblocks ] || _notrun "Scratch device too small"
> > > +
> > > +nags=2
> > > +totalcount=6
> > > +
> > > +while [ $totalcount -gt 0 ]; do
> >
> > So we run this six times? Why six, specifically? Should it be scaled
> > by TIME_FACTOR?
>
> er... no specific reason yet I think try one time may be not
> enough though...
>
> >
> > > + size=`expr 1010 \* 1048576` # 1010 megabytes initially
> > > + echo "*** creating scratch filesystem"
> > > + logblks=$(_scratch_find_xfs_min_logblocks -dsize=${size} -dagcount=${nags})
> > > +
> > > + _create_scratch -lsize=${logblks}b -dsize=${size} -dagcount=${nags}
> > > +
> > > + echo "*** using some initial space on scratch filesystem"
> > > + for i in `seq 125 -1 90`; do
> > > + fillsize=`expr $i \* 1048576`
> > > + out="$(_fill_scratch $fillsize 2>&1)"
> > > + echo "$out" | grep -q 'No space left on device' && continue
> > > + test -n "${out}" && echo "$out"
> > > + break
> > > + done
> >
> > _fill_fs ?
>
> This was copied from xfs/104 with some modification, ok, will try _fill_fs
> way since I didn't use it before.
>
> >
> > > +
> > > + decsize=`expr 42 \* 1048576` # shrink in chunks of this size at most
> >
> > This could go outside the loop.
>
> ok, will fix.
>
> >
> > > + echo "*** stressing filesystem"
> > > + while [ $size -gt $endsize ]; do
> > > + _stress_scratch
> > > + sleep 1
> > > +
> > > + decb=`expr $decsize / $dbsize` # in data blocks
> > > + while [ $decb -gt 0 ]; do
> > > + sizeb=`expr $size / $dbsize - $decb`
> > > +
> > > + xfs_growfs -D ${sizeb} $SCRATCH_MNT 2>&1 \
> >
> > Use $XFS_GROWFS_PROG, do not call xfs_growfs directly.
>
> will fix.
>
> >
> > > + | tee -a $seqres.full | _filter_mkfs 2>$tmp.growfs > /dev/null
> > > +
> > > + ret="${PIPESTATUS[0]}"
> > > + . $tmp.growfs
> > > +
> > > + [ $ret -eq 0 ] && break
> > > +
> > > + [ $decb -gt 100 ] && decb=`expr $decb + $RANDOM % 10`
> > > + decb=`expr $decb / 2`
> >
> > So... uh... what does this decb logic do? AFAICT we start by removing
> > 42MB from the end of the filesystem, and then we ... add some random
> > quantity to decb, halve it, then shrink by that amount? And we keep
> > doing smaller and smaller pieces until the shrink fails or decb becomes
> > zero...
> >
> > > + done
> > > +
> > > + wait
> > > + [ $decb -eq 0 ] && break
> >
> > ...after which we wait for fsstress to end and then loop back to
> > fsstress and shrinking?
>
> yeah, roughly the logic above, yet I don't have some better idea
> to test it so that shrink it as much as possible.
>
> >
> > I was expecting to see two tests: a basic functionality test, and then a
> > second one to race fsstress and shrink to see what happens.
>
> May I ask what is your perference about the basic functionality test?
> Just shrinking several fixed sizes is enough (to guarantee the basic
> functionality works as expected?)
Yes. Try formatting a filesystem, carving off a small amount to make
sure it works (because the last AG is mostly empty), then try carving
off bigger chunks of the AG. This will probably require a follow-up
test whenever you get AG removal working.
>
> >
> > > +
> > > + size=`expr $size - $decb \* $dbsize`
> >
> > Why don't we query the size of the filesystem instead of calculating it
> > and hoping that reflects reality?
>
> I remembered I tried before, but I forgot the reason why I used instead.
> Will try again later.
>
> One more thing is that "should we introduce a brand new argument for
> shrinking in growfs?" I vaguely remembered Eric mentioned before.
> It'd be better to get your idea about this as well so I could go further
> on that patch as well...
Hmm. Yeah, there probably should be a _require_shrink or something that
will check if growfs knows about shrinking and the kernel does too.
IIRC the current growfs program won't even try to call the kernel if the
-D argument is smaller than the fs, right? You might be able to test if
xfs_growfs -D 0 returns "data size 0 too small" vs. "invalid argument".
Either way, now would be a good time to send your xfsprogs patches to
the list as an RFC.
--D
>
> Thanks,
> Gao Xiang
>
> >
> > --D
> >
> > > + done
> > > +
> > > + _scratch_unmount
> > > + _repair_scratch_fs >> $seqres.full
> > > + totalcount=`expr $totalcount - 1`
> > > +done
> > > +
> > > +status=0
> > > +exit
> > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/522.out b/tests/xfs/522.out
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 00000000..03d512f5
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/tests/xfs/522.out
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
> > > +QA output created by 522
> > > +meta-data=DDEV isize=XXX agcount=N, agsize=XXX blks
> > > +data = bsize=XXX blocks=XXX, imaxpct=PCT
> > > + = sunit=XXX swidth=XXX, unwritten=X
> > > +naming =VERN bsize=XXX
> > > +log =LDEV bsize=XXX blocks=XXX
> > > +realtime =RDEV extsz=XXX blocks=XXX, rtextents=XXX
> > > +*** creating scratch filesystem
> > > +*** mkfs
> > > +meta-data=DDEV isize=XXX agcount=N, agsize=XXX blks
> > > +data = bsize=XXX blocks=XXX, imaxpct=PCT
> > > + = sunit=XXX swidth=XXX, unwritten=X
> > > +naming =VERN bsize=XXX
> > > +log =LDEV bsize=XXX blocks=XXX
> > > +realtime =RDEV extsz=XXX blocks=XXX, rtextents=XXX
> > > +*** mount
> > > +*** using some initial space on scratch filesystem
> > > +*** stressing filesystem
> > > +*** creating scratch filesystem
> > > +*** mkfs
> > > +meta-data=DDEV isize=XXX agcount=N, agsize=XXX blks
> > > +data = bsize=XXX blocks=XXX, imaxpct=PCT
> > > + = sunit=XXX swidth=XXX, unwritten=X
> > > +naming =VERN bsize=XXX
> > > +log =LDEV bsize=XXX blocks=XXX
> > > +realtime =RDEV extsz=XXX blocks=XXX, rtextents=XXX
> > > +*** mount
> > > +*** using some initial space on scratch filesystem
> > > +*** stressing filesystem
> > > +*** creating scratch filesystem
> > > +*** mkfs
> > > +meta-data=DDEV isize=XXX agcount=N, agsize=XXX blks
> > > +data = bsize=XXX blocks=XXX, imaxpct=PCT
> > > + = sunit=XXX swidth=XXX, unwritten=X
> > > +naming =VERN bsize=XXX
> > > +log =LDEV bsize=XXX blocks=XXX
> > > +realtime =RDEV extsz=XXX blocks=XXX, rtextents=XXX
> > > +*** mount
> > > +*** using some initial space on scratch filesystem
> > > +*** stressing filesystem
> > > +*** creating scratch filesystem
> > > +*** mkfs
> > > +meta-data=DDEV isize=XXX agcount=N, agsize=XXX blks
> > > +data = bsize=XXX blocks=XXX, imaxpct=PCT
> > > + = sunit=XXX swidth=XXX, unwritten=X
> > > +naming =VERN bsize=XXX
> > > +log =LDEV bsize=XXX blocks=XXX
> > > +realtime =RDEV extsz=XXX blocks=XXX, rtextents=XXX
> > > +*** mount
> > > +*** using some initial space on scratch filesystem
> > > +*** stressing filesystem
> > > +*** creating scratch filesystem
> > > +*** mkfs
> > > +meta-data=DDEV isize=XXX agcount=N, agsize=XXX blks
> > > +data = bsize=XXX blocks=XXX, imaxpct=PCT
> > > + = sunit=XXX swidth=XXX, unwritten=X
> > > +naming =VERN bsize=XXX
> > > +log =LDEV bsize=XXX blocks=XXX
> > > +realtime =RDEV extsz=XXX blocks=XXX, rtextents=XXX
> > > +*** mount
> > > +*** using some initial space on scratch filesystem
> > > +*** stressing filesystem
> > > +*** creating scratch filesystem
> > > +*** mkfs
> > > +meta-data=DDEV isize=XXX agcount=N, agsize=XXX blks
> > > +data = bsize=XXX blocks=XXX, imaxpct=PCT
> > > + = sunit=XXX swidth=XXX, unwritten=X
> > > +naming =VERN bsize=XXX
> > > +log =LDEV bsize=XXX blocks=XXX
> > > +realtime =RDEV extsz=XXX blocks=XXX, rtextents=XXX
> > > +*** mount
> > > +*** using some initial space on scratch filesystem
> > > +*** stressing filesystem
> > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/group b/tests/xfs/group
> > > index b89c0a4e..ab762ed6 100644
> > > --- a/tests/xfs/group
> > > +++ b/tests/xfs/group
> > > @@ -519,3 +519,4 @@
> > > 519 auto quick reflink
> > > 520 auto quick reflink
> > > 521 auto quick realtime growfs
> > > +522 auto quick growfs
> > > --
> > > 2.18.1
> > >
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-10 2:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-28 23:09 [WIP] [RFC PATCH] xfs: add test on shrinking unused space in the last AG Gao Xiang
2021-03-09 18:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-10 2:07 ` Gao Xiang
2021-03-10 2:19 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2021-03-10 0:43 ` Zorro Lang
2021-03-10 2:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-10 2:33 ` Gao Xiang
2021-03-10 2:16 ` Gao Xiang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-10-28 11:30 Gao Xiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210310021958.GD3419940@magnolia \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hsiangkao@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox