Re: [PATCH 10/11] xfs: parallelize inode inactivation

Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-15T19:03:53Z

On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 06:55:51PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 07:06:36PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> >
> > Split the inode inactivation work into per-AG work items so that we can
> > take advantage of parallelization.
>
> Any reason this isn't just done from the beginning? As-is is just
> seems to create a fair amount of churn.

I felt like the first patch was already too long at 1100 lines.

I don't mind combining them, but with the usual proviso that I don't
want the whole series to stall on reviewers going back and forth on this
point without anyone offering an RVB.

--D