From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] xfs: remove the EFD size asserts in xlog_recover_efd_commit_pass2
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 09:26:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210420162645.GF3122264@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210419082804.2076124-2-hch@lst.de>
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:27:58AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> We never actually look at the extent array in the efd items, and should
> eventually stop writing them out at all when it is time for a incompat
> log change. Ѕo don't bother with the asserts at all, and thus with the
> the structures defined just to be used with it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Seems reasonable enough...
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_log_format.h | 20 ++------------------
> fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c | 10 ++--------
> fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.h | 2 +-
> fs/xfs/xfs_ondisk.h | 2 --
> 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_log_format.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_log_format.h
> index 8bd00da6d2a40f..ea0fe9f121adff 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_log_format.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_log_format.h
> @@ -598,29 +598,13 @@ typedef struct xfs_efi_log_format_64 {
> * log. The efd_extents array is a variable size array whose
> * size is given by efd_nextents;
> */
> -typedef struct xfs_efd_log_format {
> +struct xfs_efd_log_format {
> uint16_t efd_type; /* efd log item type */
> uint16_t efd_size; /* size of this item */
> uint32_t efd_nextents; /* # of extents freed */
> uint64_t efd_efi_id; /* id of corresponding efi */
> xfs_extent_t efd_extents[1]; /* array of extents freed */
> -} xfs_efd_log_format_t;
> -
> -typedef struct xfs_efd_log_format_32 {
> - uint16_t efd_type; /* efd log item type */
> - uint16_t efd_size; /* size of this item */
> - uint32_t efd_nextents; /* # of extents freed */
> - uint64_t efd_efi_id; /* id of corresponding efi */
> - xfs_extent_32_t efd_extents[1]; /* array of extents freed */
> -} __attribute__((packed)) xfs_efd_log_format_32_t;
> -
> -typedef struct xfs_efd_log_format_64 {
> - uint16_t efd_type; /* efd log item type */
> - uint16_t efd_size; /* size of this item */
> - uint32_t efd_nextents; /* # of extents freed */
> - uint64_t efd_efi_id; /* id of corresponding efi */
> - xfs_extent_64_t efd_extents[1]; /* array of extents freed */
> -} xfs_efd_log_format_64_t;
> +};
>
> /*
> * RUI/RUD (reverse mapping) log format definitions
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c
> index 93223ebb33721e..ac17fdb9283489 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c
> @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static inline int
> xfs_efd_item_sizeof(
> struct xfs_efd_log_item *efdp)
> {
> - return sizeof(xfs_efd_log_format_t) +
> + return sizeof(struct xfs_efd_log_format) +
> (efdp->efd_format.efd_nextents - 1) * sizeof(xfs_extent_t);
> }
>
> @@ -743,13 +743,7 @@ xlog_recover_efd_commit_pass2(
> struct xlog_recover_item *item,
> xfs_lsn_t lsn)
> {
> - struct xfs_efd_log_format *efd_formatp;
> -
> - efd_formatp = item->ri_buf[0].i_addr;
> - ASSERT((item->ri_buf[0].i_len == (sizeof(xfs_efd_log_format_32_t) +
> - ((efd_formatp->efd_nextents - 1) * sizeof(xfs_extent_32_t)))) ||
> - (item->ri_buf[0].i_len == (sizeof(xfs_efd_log_format_64_t) +
> - ((efd_formatp->efd_nextents - 1) * sizeof(xfs_extent_64_t)))));
> + struct xfs_efd_log_format *efd_formatp = item->ri_buf[0].i_addr;
>
> xlog_recover_release_intent(log, XFS_LI_EFI, efd_formatp->efd_efi_id);
> return 0;
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.h
> index cd2860c875bf50..6b80452ad2a71b 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.h
> @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ struct xfs_efd_log_item {
> struct xfs_log_item efd_item;
> struct xfs_efi_log_item *efd_efip;
> uint efd_next_extent;
> - xfs_efd_log_format_t efd_format;
> + struct xfs_efd_log_format efd_format;
> };
>
> /*
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ondisk.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_ondisk.h
> index 0aa87c2101049c..7328ff92e0ee8a 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ondisk.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ondisk.h
> @@ -118,8 +118,6 @@ xfs_check_ondisk_structs(void)
> /* log structures */
> XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_buf_log_format, 88);
> XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_dq_logformat, 24);
> - XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_efd_log_format_32, 28);
> - XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_efd_log_format_64, 32);
> XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_efi_log_format_32, 28);
> XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_efi_log_format_64, 32);
> XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_extent_32, 12);
> --
> 2.30.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-20 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-19 8:27 cleanup the EFI/EFD definitions Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-19 8:27 ` [PATCH 1/7] xfs: remove the EFD size asserts in xlog_recover_efd_commit_pass2 Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-20 16:26 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2021-04-19 8:27 ` [PATCH 2/7] xfs: clean up the EFI and EFD log format handling Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-20 17:05 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-21 5:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-22 0:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-19 8:28 ` [PATCH 3/7] xfs: pass a xfs_efi_log_item to xfs_efi_item_sizeof Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-20 17:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-21 5:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-22 0:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-19 8:28 ` [PATCH 4/7] xfs: pass a xfs_efd_log_item to xfs_efd_item_sizeof Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-20 17:10 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-19 8:28 ` [PATCH 5/7] xfs: add a xfs_efi_item_sizeof helper Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-20 17:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-19 8:28 ` [PATCH 6/7] xfs: add a xfs_efd_item_sizeof helper Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-20 17:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-19 8:28 ` [PATCH 7/7] xfs: Replace one-element arrays with flexible-array members Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-20 17:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-20 22:16 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210420162645.GF3122264@magnolia \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox