Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] xfs: set aside allocation btree blocks from block reservation

Allison Henderson
2021-04-27T21:37:29Z

On 4/23/21 6:10 AM, Brian Foster wrote:
> The blocks used for allocation btrees (bnobt and countbt) are
> technically considered free space. This is because as free space is
> used, allocbt blocks are removed and naturally become available for
> traditional allocation. However, this means that a significant
> portion of free space may consist of in-use btree blocks if free
> space is severely fragmented.
>
> On large filesystems with large perag reservations, this can lead to
> a rare but nasty condition where a significant amount of physical
> free space is available, but the majority of actual usable blocks
> consist of in-use allocbt blocks. We have a record of a (~12TB, 32
> AG) filesystem with multiple AGs in a state with ~2.5GB or so free
> blocks tracked across ~300 total allocbt blocks, but effectively at
> 100% full because the the free space is entirely consumed by
> refcountbt perag reservation.
>
> Such a large perag reservation is by design on large filesystems.
> The problem is that because the free space is so fragmented, this AG
> contributes the 300 or so allocbt blocks to the global counters as
> free space. If this pattern repeats across enough AGs, the
> filesystem lands in a state where global block reservation can
> outrun physical block availability. For example, a streaming
> buffered write on the affected filesystem continues to allow delayed
> allocation beyond the point where writeback starts to fail due to
> physical block allocation failures. The expected behavior is for the
> delalloc block reservation to fail gracefully with -ENOSPC before
> physical block allocation failure is a possibility.
>
> To address this problem, set aside in-use allocbt blocks at
> reservation time and thus ensure they cannot be reserved until truly
> available for physical allocation. This allows alloc btree metadata
> to continue to reside in free space, but dynamically adjusts
> reservation availability based on internal state. Note that the
> logic requires that the allocbt counter is fully populated at
> reservation time before it is fully effective. We currently rely on
> the mount time AGF scan in the perag reservation initialization code
> for this dependency on filesystems where it's most important (i.e.
> with active perag reservations).
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
OK, makes sense, thanks for the comments!
Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> index cb1e2c4702c3..bdfee1943796 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> @@ -1188,6 +1188,7 @@ xfs_mod_fdblocks(
> int64_t lcounter;
> long long res_used;
> s32 batch;
> + uint64_t set_aside;
>
> if (delta > 0) {
> /*
> @@ -1227,8 +1228,20 @@ xfs_mod_fdblocks(
> else
> batch = XFS_FDBLOCKS_BATCH;
>
> + /*
> + * Set aside allocbt blocks because these blocks are tracked as free
> + * space but not available for allocation. Technically this means that a
> + * single reservation cannot consume all remaining free space, but the
> + * ratio of allocbt blocks to usable free blocks should be rather small.
> + * The tradeoff without this is that filesystems that maintain high
> + * perag block reservations can over reserve physical block availability
> + * and fail physical allocation, which leads to much more serious
> + * problems (i.e. transaction abort, pagecache discards, etc.) than
> + * slightly premature -ENOSPC.
> + */
> + set_aside = mp->m_alloc_set_aside + atomic64_read(&mp->m_allocbt_blks);
> percpu_counter_add_batch(&mp->m_fdblocks, delta, batch);
> - if (__percpu_counter_compare(&mp->m_fdblocks, mp->m_alloc_set_aside,
> + if (__percpu_counter_compare(&mp->m_fdblocks, set_aside,
> XFS_FDBLOCKS_BATCH) >= 0) {
> /* we had space! */
> return 0;
>