Re: [PATCH 08/45] xfs: journal IO cache flush reductions

Chandan Babu R
2021-03-08T10:50:58Z

On 05 Mar 2021 at 10:41, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> Currently every journal IO is issued as REQ_PREFLUSH | REQ_FUA to
> guarantee the ordering requirements the journal has w.r.t. metadata
> writeback. THe two ordering constraints are:
>
> 1. we cannot overwrite metadata in the journal until we guarantee
> that the dirty metadata has been written back in place and is
> stable.
>
> 2. we cannot write back dirty metadata until it has been written to
> the journal and guaranteed to be stable (and hence recoverable) in
> the journal.
>
> The ordering guarantees of #1 are provided by REQ_PREFLUSH. This
> causes the journal IO to issue a cache flush and wait for it to
> complete before issuing the write IO to the journal. Hence all
> completed metadata IO is guaranteed to be stable before the journal
> overwrites the old metadata.
>
> The ordering guarantees of #2 are provided by the REQ_FUA, which
> ensures the journal writes do not complete until they are on stable
> storage. Hence by the time the last journal IO in a checkpoint
> completes, we know that the entire checkpoint is on stable storage
> and we can unpin the dirty metadata and allow it to be written back.
>
> This is the mechanism by which ordering was first implemented in XFS
> way back in 2002 by commit 95d97c36e5155075ba2eb22b17562cfcc53fcf96
> ("Add support for drive write cache flushing") in the xfs-archive
> tree.
>
> A lot has changed since then, most notably we now use delayed
> logging to checkpoint the filesystem to the journal rather than
> write each individual transaction to the journal. Cache flushes on
> journal IO are necessary when individual transactions are wholly
> contained within a single iclog. However, CIL checkpoints are single
> transactions that typically span hundreds to thousands of individual
> journal writes, and so the requirements for device cache flushing
> have changed.
>
> That is, the ordering rules I state above apply to ordering of
> atomic transactions recorded in the journal, not to the journal IO
> itself. Hence we need to ensure metadata is stable before we start
> writing a new transaction to the journal (guarantee #1), and we need
> to ensure the entire transaction is stable in the journal before we
> start metadata writeback (guarantee #2).
>
> Hence we only need a REQ_PREFLUSH on the journal IO that starts a
> new journal transaction to provide #1, and it is not on any other
> journal IO done within the context of that journal transaction.
>
> The CIL checkpoint already issues a cache flush before it starts
> writing to the log, so we no longer need the iclog IO to issue a
> REQ_REFLUSH for us. Hence if XLOG_START_TRANS is passed
> to xlog_write(), we no longer need to mark the first iclog in
> the log write with REQ_PREFLUSH for this case. As an added bonus,
> this ordering mechanism works for both internal and external logs,
> meaning we can remove the explicit data device cache flushes from
> the iclog write code when using external logs.
>
> Given the new ordering semantics of commit records for the CIL, we
> need iclogs containing commit records to issue a REQ_PREFLUSH. We
> also require unmount records to do this. Hence for both
> XLOG_COMMIT_TRANS and XLOG_UNMOUNT_TRANS xlog_write() calls we need
> to mark the first iclog being written with REQ_PREFLUSH.
>
> For both commit records and unmount records, we also want them
> immediately on stable storage, so we want to also mark the iclogs
> that contain these records to be marked REQ_FUA. That means if a
> record is split across multiple iclogs, they are all marked REQ_FUA
> and not just the last one so that when the transaction is completed
> all the parts of the record are on stable storage.
>
> And for external logs, unmount records need a pre-write data device
> cache flush similar to the CIL checkpoint cache pre-flush as the
> internal iclog write code does not do this implicitly anymore.
>
> As an optimisation, when the commit record lands in the same iclog
> as the journal transaction starts, we don't need to wait for
> anything and can simply use REQ_FUA to provide guarantee #2. This
> means that for fsync() heavy workloads, the cache flush behaviour is
> completely unchanged and there is no degradation in performance as a
> result of optimise the multi-IO transaction case.
>
> The most notable sign that there is less IO latency on my test
> machine (nvme SSDs) is that the "noiclogs" rate has dropped
> substantially. This metric indicates that the CIL push is blocking
> in xlog_get_iclog_space() waiting for iclog IO completion to occur.
> With 8 iclogs of 256kB, the rate is appoximately 1 noiclog event to
> every 4 iclog writes. IOWs, every 4th call to xlog_get_iclog_space()
> is blocking waiting for log IO. With the changes in this patch, this
> drops to 1 noiclog event for every 100 iclog writes. Hence it is
> clear that log IO is completing much faster than it was previously,
> but it is also clear that for large iclog sizes, this isn't the
> performance limiting factor on this hardware.
>
> With smaller iclogs (32kB), however, there is a sustantial
> difference. With the cache flush modifications, the journal is now
> running at over 4000 write IOPS, and the journal throughput is
> largely identical to the 256kB iclogs and the noiclog event rate
> stays low at about 1:50 iclog writes. The existing code tops out at
> about 2500 IOPS as the number of cache flushes dominate performance
> and latency. The noiclog event rate is about 1:4, and the
> performance variance is quite large as the journal throughput can
> fall to less than half the peak sustained rate when the cache flush
> rate prevents metadata writeback from keeping up and the log runs
> out of space and throttles reservations.
>
> As a result:
>
> logbsize fsmark create rate rm -rf
> before 32kb 152851+/-5.3e+04 5m28s
> patched 32kb 221533+/-1.1e+04 5m24s
>
> before 256kb 220239+/-6.2e+03 4m58s
> patched 256kb 228286+/-9.2e+03 5m06s
>
> The rm -rf times are included because I ran them, but the
> differences are largely noise. This workload is largely metadata
> read IO latency bound and the changes to the journal cache flushing
> doesn't really make any noticable difference to behaviour apart from
> a reduction in noiclog events from background CIL pushing.
>

I see that the missing preflush w.r.t previous iclogs of a multi-iclog
checkpoint transaction has been handled in this version. Hence,

Reviewed-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>

--
chandan