From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 33/39] xfs: Add order IDs to log items in CIL
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 12:00:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210527190023.GK2402049@locust> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210519121317.585244-34-david@fromorbit.com>
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 10:13:11PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> Before we split the ordered CIL up into per cpu lists, we need a
> mechanism to track the order of the items in the CIL. We need to do
> this because there are rules around the order in which related items
> must physically appear in the log even inside a single checkpoint
> transaction.
>
> An example of this is intents - an intent must appear in the log
> before it's intent done record so taht log recovery can cancel the
s/taht/that/
> intent correctly. If we have these two records misordered in the
> CIL, then they will not be recovered correctly by journal replay.
>
> We also will not be able to move items to the tail of
> the CIL list when they are relogged, hence the log items will need
> some mechanism to allow the correct log item order to be recreated
> before we write log items to the hournal.
>
> Hence we need to have a mechanism for recording global order of
> transactions in the log items so that we can recover that order
> from un-ordered per-cpu lists.
>
> Do this with a simple monotonic increasing commit counter in the CIL
> context. Each log item in the transaction gets stamped with the
> current commit order ID before it is added to the CIL. If the item
> is already in the CIL, leave it where it is instead of moving it to
> the tail of the list and instead sort the list before we start the
> push work.
>
> XXX: list_sort() under the cil_ctx_lock held exclusive starts
> hurting that >16 threads. Front end commits are waiting on the push
> to switch contexts much longer. The item order id should likely be
> moved into the logvecs when they are detacted from the items, then
> the sort can be done on the logvec after the cil_ctx_lock has been
> released. logvecs will need to use a list_head for this rather than
> a single linked list like they do now....
...which I guess happens in patch 35 now?
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> fs/xfs/xfs_log_priv.h | 1 +
> fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c
> index b12a2f9ba23a..ca6e411e388e 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c
> @@ -461,6 +461,7 @@ xlog_cil_insert_items(
> int len = 0;
> int iovhdr_res = 0, split_res = 0, ctx_res = 0;
> int space_used;
> + int order;
> struct xlog_cil_pcp *cilpcp;
>
> ASSERT(tp);
> @@ -550,10 +551,12 @@ xlog_cil_insert_items(
> }
>
> /*
> - * Now (re-)position everything modified at the tail of the CIL.
> + * Now update the order of everything modified in the transaction
> + * and insert items into the CIL if they aren't already there.
> * We do this here so we only need to take the CIL lock once during
> * the transaction commit.
> */
> + order = atomic_inc_return(&ctx->order_id);
> spin_lock(&cil->xc_cil_lock);
> list_for_each_entry(lip, &tp->t_items, li_trans) {
>
> @@ -561,13 +564,10 @@ xlog_cil_insert_items(
> if (!test_bit(XFS_LI_DIRTY, &lip->li_flags))
> continue;
>
> - /*
> - * Only move the item if it isn't already at the tail. This is
> - * to prevent a transient list_empty() state when reinserting
> - * an item that is already the only item in the CIL.
> - */
> - if (!list_is_last(&lip->li_cil, &cil->xc_cil))
> - list_move_tail(&lip->li_cil, &cil->xc_cil);
> + lip->li_order_id = order;
> + if (!list_empty(&lip->li_cil))
> + continue;
> + list_add_tail(&lip->li_cil, &cil->xc_cil);
> }
>
> spin_unlock(&cil->xc_cil_lock);
> @@ -780,6 +780,26 @@ xlog_cil_build_trans_hdr(
> tic->t_curr_res -= lvhdr->lv_bytes;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * CIL item reordering compare function. We want to order in ascending ID order,
> + * but we want to leave items with the same ID in the order they were added to
When do we have items with the same id?
I guess that happens if we have multiple transactions adding items to
the cil at the same time? I guess that's not a big deal since each of
those threads will hold a disjoint set of locks, so even if the order
ids are the same for a bunch of items, they're never going to be
touching the same AG/inode/metadata object, right?
If that's correct, then:
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> + * the list. This is important for operations like reflink where we log 4 order
> + * dependent intents in a single transaction when we overwrite an existing
> + * shared extent with a new shared extent. i.e. BUI(unmap), CUI(drop),
> + * CUI (inc), BUI(remap)...
> + */
> +static int
> +xlog_cil_order_cmp(
> + void *priv,
> + const struct list_head *a,
> + const struct list_head *b)
> +{
> + struct xfs_log_item *l1 = container_of(a, struct xfs_log_item, li_cil);
> + struct xfs_log_item *l2 = container_of(b, struct xfs_log_item, li_cil);
> +
> + return l1->li_order_id > l2->li_order_id;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Push the Committed Item List to the log.
> *
> @@ -900,6 +920,7 @@ xlog_cil_push_work(
> * needed on the transaction commit side which is currently locked out
> * by the flush lock.
> */
> + list_sort(NULL, &cil->xc_cil, xlog_cil_order_cmp);
> lv = NULL;
> while (!list_empty(&cil->xc_cil)) {
> struct xfs_log_item *item;
> @@ -907,6 +928,7 @@ xlog_cil_push_work(
> item = list_first_entry(&cil->xc_cil,
> struct xfs_log_item, li_cil);
> list_del_init(&item->li_cil);
> + item->li_order_id = 0;
> if (!ctx->lv_chain)
> ctx->lv_chain = item->li_lv;
> else
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_priv.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_priv.h
> index b80cb3a0edb7..466862a943ba 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_priv.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_priv.h
> @@ -225,6 +225,7 @@ struct xfs_cil_ctx {
> struct list_head committing; /* ctx committing list */
> struct work_struct discard_endio_work;
> struct work_struct push_work;
> + atomic_t order_id;
> };
>
> /*
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h
> index 50da47f23a07..2d1cc1ff93c7 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ struct xfs_log_item {
> struct xfs_log_vec *li_lv; /* active log vector */
> struct xfs_log_vec *li_lv_shadow; /* standby vector */
> xfs_csn_t li_seq; /* CIL commit seq */
> + uint32_t li_order_id; /* CIL commit order */
> };
>
> /*
> --
> 2.31.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-27 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-19 12:12 [PATCH 00/39 v4] xfs: CIL and log optimisations Dave Chinner
2021-05-19 12:12 ` [PATCH 01/39] xfs: log stripe roundoff is a property of the log Dave Chinner
2021-05-28 0:54 ` Allison Henderson
2021-05-19 12:12 ` [PATCH 02/39] xfs: separate CIL commit record IO Dave Chinner
2021-05-28 0:54 ` Allison Henderson
2021-05-19 12:12 ` [PATCH 03/39] xfs: remove xfs_blkdev_issue_flush Dave Chinner
2021-05-28 0:54 ` Allison Henderson
2021-05-19 12:12 ` [PATCH 04/39] xfs: async blkdev cache flush Dave Chinner
2021-05-20 23:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-28 0:54 ` Allison Henderson
2021-05-19 12:12 ` [PATCH 05/39] xfs: CIL checkpoint flushes caches unconditionally Dave Chinner
2021-05-28 0:54 ` Allison Henderson
2021-05-19 12:12 ` [PATCH 06/39] xfs: remove need_start_rec parameter from xlog_write() Dave Chinner
2021-05-19 12:12 ` [PATCH 07/39] xfs: journal IO cache flush reductions Dave Chinner
2021-05-21 0:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-19 12:12 ` [PATCH 08/39] xfs: Fix CIL throttle hang when CIL space used going backwards Dave Chinner
2021-05-19 12:12 ` [PATCH 09/39] xfs: xfs_log_force_lsn isn't passed a LSN Dave Chinner
2021-05-21 0:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-19 12:12 ` [PATCH 10/39] xfs: AIL needs asynchronous CIL forcing Dave Chinner
2021-05-21 0:33 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-19 12:12 ` [PATCH 11/39] xfs: CIL work is serialised, not pipelined Dave Chinner
2021-05-21 0:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-19 12:12 ` [PATCH 12/39] xfs: factor out the CIL transaction header building Dave Chinner
2021-05-19 12:12 ` [PATCH 13/39] xfs: only CIL pushes require a start record Dave Chinner
2021-05-19 12:12 ` [PATCH 14/39] xfs: embed the xlog_op_header in the unmount record Dave Chinner
2021-05-21 0:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-19 12:12 ` [PATCH 15/39] xfs: embed the xlog_op_header in the commit record Dave Chinner
2021-05-19 12:12 ` [PATCH 16/39] xfs: log tickets don't need log client id Dave Chinner
2021-05-21 0:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-19 12:12 ` [PATCH 17/39] xfs: move log iovec alignment to preparation function Dave Chinner
2021-05-19 12:12 ` [PATCH 18/39] xfs: reserve space and initialise xlog_op_header in item formatting Dave Chinner
2021-05-19 12:12 ` [PATCH 19/39] xfs: log ticket region debug is largely useless Dave Chinner
2021-05-19 12:12 ` [PATCH 20/39] xfs: pass lv chain length into xlog_write() Dave Chinner
2021-05-27 17:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-02 22:18 ` Dave Chinner
2021-06-02 22:24 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-02 22:58 ` [PATCH 20/39 V2] " Dave Chinner
2021-06-02 23:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-19 12:12 ` [PATCH 21/39] xfs: introduce xlog_write_single() Dave Chinner
2021-05-27 17:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-19 12:13 ` [PATCH 22/39] xfs:_introduce xlog_write_partial() Dave Chinner
2021-05-27 18:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-02 22:21 ` Dave Chinner
2021-05-19 12:13 ` [PATCH 23/39] xfs: xlog_write() no longer needs contwr state Dave Chinner
2021-05-19 12:13 ` [PATCH 24/39] xfs: xlog_write() doesn't need optype anymore Dave Chinner
2021-05-27 18:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-19 12:13 ` [PATCH 25/39] xfs: CIL context doesn't need to count iovecs Dave Chinner
2021-05-27 18:08 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-19 12:13 ` [PATCH 26/39] xfs: use the CIL space used counter for emptiness checks Dave Chinner
2021-05-19 12:13 ` [PATCH 27/39] xfs: lift init CIL reservation out of xc_cil_lock Dave Chinner
2021-05-19 12:13 ` [PATCH 28/39] xfs: rework per-iclog header CIL reservation Dave Chinner
2021-05-27 18:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-19 12:13 ` [PATCH 29/39] xfs: introduce per-cpu CIL tracking structure Dave Chinner
2021-05-27 18:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-19 12:13 ` [PATCH 30/39] xfs: implement percpu cil space used calculation Dave Chinner
2021-05-27 18:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-02 23:47 ` Dave Chinner
2021-06-03 1:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-03 2:28 ` Dave Chinner
2021-06-03 3:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-03 3:56 ` Dave Chinner
2021-05-19 12:13 ` [PATCH 31/39] xfs: track CIL ticket reservation in percpu structure Dave Chinner
2021-05-27 18:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-19 12:13 ` [PATCH 32/39] xfs: convert CIL busy extents to per-cpu Dave Chinner
2021-05-27 18:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-19 12:13 ` [PATCH 33/39] xfs: Add order IDs to log items in CIL Dave Chinner
2021-05-27 19:00 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2021-06-03 0:16 ` Dave Chinner
2021-06-03 0:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-03 2:13 ` Dave Chinner
2021-06-03 3:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-19 12:13 ` [PATCH 34/39] xfs: convert CIL to unordered per cpu lists Dave Chinner
2021-05-27 19:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-03 0:27 ` Dave Chinner
2021-05-19 12:13 ` [PATCH 35/39] xfs: convert log vector chain to use list heads Dave Chinner
2021-05-27 19:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-03 0:38 ` Dave Chinner
2021-06-03 0:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-19 12:13 ` [PATCH 36/39] xfs: move CIL ordering to the logvec chain Dave Chinner
2021-05-27 19:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-19 12:13 ` [PATCH 37/39] xfs: avoid cil push lock if possible Dave Chinner
2021-05-27 19:18 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-19 12:13 ` [PATCH 38/39] xfs: xlog_sync() manually adjusts grant head space Dave Chinner
2021-05-19 12:13 ` [PATCH 39/39] xfs: expanding delayed logging design with background material Dave Chinner
2021-05-27 20:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-03 0:57 ` Dave Chinner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-06-03 5:22 [PATCH 00/39 v5] xfs: CIL and log optimisations Dave Chinner
2021-06-03 5:22 ` [PATCH 33/39] xfs: Add order IDs to log items in CIL Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210527190023.GK2402049@locust \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox