Re: [PATCH 0/8 V2] xfs: log fixes for for-next

Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-18T14:03:03Z

On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 02:55:03PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> xlog_write_single is always entered first by xlog_write, so we also
> get here for something that later gets handled by xlog_write_partial.
> Which means it could be way bigger than the current iclog, and I see no
> reason why that iclog would have to be XLOG_STATE_WANT_SYNC.

Actually I'll take that back. There is a second call to
xlog_state_switch_iclogs which we should hit and thus have moved to
XLOG_STATE_WANT_SYNC.