From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] xfs_repair: invalidate dirhash entry when junking dirent
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 12:16:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210727191611.GI559212@magnolia> (raw)
From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
In longform_dir2_entry_check_data, we add the directory entries we find
to the incore dirent hash table after we've validated the name but
before we're totally done checking the entry. This sequence is
necessary to detect all duplicated names in the directory.
Unfortunately, if we later decide to junk the ondisk dirent, we neglect
to mark the dirhash entry, so if the directory gets rebuilt, it will get
rebuilt with the entry that we rejected.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
---
repair/phase6.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/repair/phase6.c b/repair/phase6.c
index 29259b38..84092269 100644
--- a/repair/phase6.c
+++ b/repair/phase6.c
@@ -237,6 +237,21 @@ dir_hash_add(
return !dup;
}
+/* Mark an existing directory hashtable entry as junk. */
+static void
+dir_hash_junkit(
+ struct dir_hash_tab *hashtab,
+ xfs_dir2_dataptr_t addr)
+{
+ struct dir_hash_ent *p;
+
+ p = radix_tree_lookup(&hashtab->byaddr, addr);
+ assert(p != NULL);
+
+ p->junkit = 1;
+ p->namebuf[0] = '/';
+}
+
static int
dir_hash_check(
struct dir_hash_tab *hashtab,
@@ -2009,6 +2024,7 @@ longform_dir2_entry_check_data(
if (entry_junked(
_("entry \"%s\" (ino %" PRIu64 ") in dir %" PRIu64 " is not in the the first block"), fname,
inum, ip->i_ino)) {
+ dir_hash_junkit(hashtab, addr);
dep->name[0] = '/';
libxfs_dir2_data_log_entry(&da, bp, dep);
}
@@ -2036,6 +2052,7 @@ longform_dir2_entry_check_data(
if (entry_junked(
_("entry \"%s\" in dir %" PRIu64 " is not the first entry"),
fname, inum, ip->i_ino)) {
+ dir_hash_junkit(hashtab, addr);
dep->name[0] = '/';
libxfs_dir2_data_log_entry(&da, bp, dep);
}
@@ -2124,6 +2141,7 @@ _("entry \"%s\" in dir inode %" PRIu64 " inconsistent with .. value (%" PRIu64 "
orphanage_ino = 0;
nbad++;
if (!no_modify) {
+ dir_hash_junkit(hashtab, addr);
dep->name[0] = '/';
libxfs_dir2_data_log_entry(&da, bp, dep);
if (verbose)
next reply other threads:[~2021-07-27 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-27 19:16 Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2021-07-27 22:17 ` [PATCH] xfs_repair: invalidate dirhash entry when junking dirent Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210727191611.GI559212@magnolia \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox