From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/16] xfs: rename xfs_has_attr()
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 19:56:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210818025600.GG12640@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210818005608.GM3657114@dread.disaster.area>
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 10:56:08AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 09:03:34AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 03:24:37PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> > >
> > > xfs_has_attr() is poorly named. It has global scope as it is defined
> > > in a header file, but it has no namespace scope that tells us what
> > > it is checking has attributes. It's not even clear what "has_attr"
> > > means, because what it is actually doing is an attribute fork lookup
> > > to see if the attribute exists.
> > >
> > > Upcoming patches use this "xfs_has_<foo>" namespace for global
> > > filesystem features, which conflicts with this function.
> > >
> > > Rename xfs_has_attr() to xfs_attr_lookup() and make it a static
> > > function, freeing up the "xfs_has_" namespace for global scope
> > > usage.
> >
> > Why not kill this function entirely as I suggested last time?
>
> Because I think it's the wrong cleanup to apply to xfs_attr_set().
> xfs_attr_set() needs to be split into two - a set() function and a
> remove() function to get rid of all the conditional "if
> (arg->value)" logic in it that separates set from remove. Most
> of the code in the function is under such if/else clauses, and the
> set() code is much more complex than the remove() case. Folding the
> attr lookup into the xfs_attr_set() doesn't do anything to address
> this high level badness, and to split it appropriately we need to
> keep the common attr lookup code in it's own function.
>
> I updated the patch to has a single xfs_attr_lookup() call instead
> of one per branch, but I don't think removing the helper is the
> right way to go here...
I prefer we leave the xattr code alone (renaming things to avoid name
conflicts is ok) and concentrated on helping Allison land xattr logging.
Once that's done, xfs_attr_set and xfs_attr_remove become trivial
frontends to a deferred operation.
--D
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-18 2:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-10 5:24 [PATCH 00/16 v2] xfs: rework feature flags Dave Chinner
2021-08-10 5:24 ` [PATCH 01/16] xfs: sb verifier doesn't handle uncached sb buffer Dave Chinner
2021-08-11 0:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-12 7:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-10 5:24 ` [PATCH 02/16] xfs: rename xfs_has_attr() Dave Chinner
2021-08-12 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-18 0:56 ` Dave Chinner
2021-08-18 2:56 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2021-08-10 5:24 ` [PATCH 03/16] xfs: rework attr2 feature and mount options Dave Chinner
2021-08-11 23:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-18 1:18 ` Dave Chinner
2021-08-12 0:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-18 1:25 ` Dave Chinner
2021-08-10 5:24 ` [PATCH 04/16] xfs: reflect sb features in xfs_mount Dave Chinner
2021-08-10 5:24 ` [PATCH 05/16] xfs: replace xfs_sb_version checks with feature flag checks Dave Chinner
2021-08-11 22:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-18 1:33 ` Dave Chinner
2021-08-10 5:24 ` [PATCH 06/16] xfs: consolidate mount option features in m_features Dave Chinner
2021-08-12 8:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-10 5:24 ` [PATCH 07/16] xfs: convert mount flags to features Dave Chinner
2021-08-11 0:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-11 23:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-18 2:25 ` Dave Chinner
2021-08-10 5:24 ` [PATCH 08/16] xfs: convert remaining mount flags to state flags Dave Chinner
2021-08-10 5:24 ` [PATCH 09/16] xfs: replace XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN with xfs_is_shutdown Dave Chinner
2021-08-10 5:24 ` [PATCH 10/16] xfs: convert xfs_fs_geometry to use mount feature checks Dave Chinner
2021-08-11 0:39 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-10 5:24 ` [PATCH 11/16] xfs: open code sb verifier " Dave Chinner
2021-08-11 0:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-10 5:24 ` [PATCH 12/16] xfs: convert scrub to use mount-based " Dave Chinner
2021-08-10 5:24 ` [PATCH 13/16] xfs: convert xfs_sb_version_has checks to use mount features Dave Chinner
2021-08-10 5:24 ` [PATCH 14/16] xfs: remove unused xfs_sb_version_has wrappers Dave Chinner
2021-08-10 5:24 ` [PATCH 15/16] xfs: introduce xfs_sb_is_v5 helper Dave Chinner
2021-08-10 5:24 ` [PATCH 16/16] xfs: kill xfs_sb_version_has_v3inode() Dave Chinner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-08-18 23:59 [PATCH 00/16 v3] xfs: rework feature flags Dave Chinner
2021-08-18 23:59 ` [PATCH 02/16] xfs: rename xfs_has_attr() Dave Chinner
2021-07-14 4:18 [PATCH 00/16] xfs: rework feature flags Dave Chinner
2021-07-14 4:18 ` [PATCH 02/16] xfs: rename xfs_has_attr() Dave Chinner
2021-07-14 6:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-14 22:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210818025600.GG12640@magnolia \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox