public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] xfs: take the ILOCK when accessing the inode core
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 10:59:33 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211217185933.GJ27664@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211216045609.GY449541@dread.disaster.area>

On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 03:56:09PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 05:09:21PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> > 
> > I was poking around in the directory code while diagnosing online fsck
> > bugs, and noticed that xfs_readdir doesn't actually take the directory
> > ILOCK when it calls xfs_dir2_isblock.  xfs_dir_open most probably loaded
> > the data fork mappings
> 
> Yup, that is pretty much guaranteed. If the inode is extent or btree form as the
> extent count will be non-zero, hence we can only get to the
> xfs_dir2_isblock() check if the inode has moved from local to block
> form between the open and xfs_dir2_isblock() get in the getdents
> code.
> 
> > and the VFS took i_rwsem (aka IOLOCK_SHARED) so
> > we're protected against writer threads, but we really need to follow the
> > locking model like we do in other places.  The same applies to the
> > shortform getdents function.
> 
> Locking rules should be the same as xfs_dir_lookup().....
> 
> 
> > While we're at it, clean up the somewhat strange structure of this
> > function.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_readdir.c |   28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
> >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > 
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_readdir.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_readdir.c
> > index 8310005af00f..25560151c273 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_readdir.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_readdir.c
> > @@ -507,8 +507,9 @@ xfs_readdir(
> >  	size_t			bufsize)
> >  {
> >  	struct xfs_da_args	args = { NULL };
> > -	int			rval;
> > -	int			v;
> > +	unsigned int		lock_mode;
> > +	int			error;
> > +	int			isblock;
> >  
> >  	trace_xfs_readdir(dp);
> >  
> > @@ -522,14 +523,19 @@ xfs_readdir(
> >  	args.geo = dp->i_mount->m_dir_geo;
> >  	args.trans = tp;
> >  
> > -	if (dp->i_df.if_format == XFS_DINODE_FMT_LOCAL)
> > -		rval = xfs_dir2_sf_getdents(&args, ctx);
> > -	else if ((rval = xfs_dir2_isblock(&args, &v)))
> > -		;
> > -	else if (v)
> > -		rval = xfs_dir2_block_getdents(&args, ctx);
> > -	else
> > -		rval = xfs_dir2_leaf_getdents(&args, ctx, bufsize);
> > +	lock_mode = xfs_ilock_data_map_shared(dp);
> > +	if (dp->i_df.if_format == XFS_DINODE_FMT_LOCAL) {
> > +		xfs_iunlock(dp, lock_mode);
> > +		return xfs_dir2_sf_getdents(&args, ctx);
> > +	}
> >  
> > -	return rval;
> > +	error = xfs_dir2_isblock(&args, &isblock);
> > +	xfs_iunlock(dp, lock_mode);
> > +	if (error)
> > +		return error;
> > +
> > +	if (isblock)
> > +		return xfs_dir2_block_getdents(&args, ctx);
> > +
> > +	return xfs_dir2_leaf_getdents(&args, ctx, bufsize);
> 
> Yeah, nah.
> 
> The ILOCK has to be held for xfs_dir2_block_getdents() and
> xfs_dir2_leaf_getdents() for the same reason that it needs to be
> held for xfs_dir2_isblock(). They both need to do BMBT lookups to
> find the physical location of directory blocks in the directory, so
> technically need to lock out modifications to the BMBT tree while
> they are doing those lookups.
> 
> Yup, I know, VFS holds i_rwsem, so directory can't be modified while
> xfs_readdir() is running, but if you are going to make one of these
> functions have to take the ILOCK, then they all need to. See
> xfs_dir_lookup()....

Hmm.  I thought (and Chandan asked in passing) that the reason that we
keep cycling the directory ILOCK in the block/leaf getdents functions is
because the VFS ->actor functions (aka filldir) directly copy dirents to
userspace and we could trigger a page fault.  The page fault could
trigger memory reclaim, which could in turn route us to writeback with
that ILOCK still held.

Though, thinking about this further, the directory we have ILOCKed
doesn't itself use the page cache, so writeback will never touch it.
So I /think/ it's ok to grab the xfs_ilock_data_map_shared once in
xfs_readdir and hold it all the way to the end of the function?

Or at least I tried it and lockdep didn't complain immediately... :P

--D

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-17 18:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-16  1:09 [PATCHSET 0/7] xfs: random fixes for 5.17 Darrick J. Wong
2021-12-16  1:09 ` [PATCH 1/7] xfs: take the ILOCK when accessing the inode core Darrick J. Wong
2021-12-16  4:56   ` Dave Chinner
2021-12-17 18:59     ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2021-12-21  1:08       ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-12-21  5:10         ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-04  1:19           ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-05  0:09     ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-05  1:38       ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-12-16  1:09 ` [PATCH 2/7] xfs: shut down filesystem if we xfs_trans_cancel with deferred work items Darrick J. Wong
2021-12-16  4:57   ` Dave Chinner
2021-12-24  7:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-12-16  1:09 ` [PATCH 3/7] xfs: fix a bug in the online fsck directory leaf1 bestcount check Darrick J. Wong
2021-12-16  5:05   ` Dave Chinner
2021-12-16 19:25     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-12-16 21:17       ` Dave Chinner
2021-12-16 21:40         ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-12-16 22:04   ` Dave Chinner
2021-12-24  7:17   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-12-16  1:09 ` [PATCH 4/7] xfs: prevent UAF in xfs_log_item_in_current_chkpt Darrick J. Wong
2021-12-16  4:36   ` Dave Chinner
2021-12-16 16:35     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-12-16  1:09 ` [PATCH 5/7] xfs: fix quotaoff mutex usage now that we don't support disabling it Darrick J. Wong
2021-12-16  5:07   ` Dave Chinner
2021-12-24  7:17   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-12-16  1:09 ` [PATCH 6/7] xfs: don't expose internal symlink metadata buffers to the vfs Darrick J. Wong
2021-12-16  5:11   ` Dave Chinner
2021-12-17  2:58     ` Ian Kent
2021-12-24  7:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-12-16  1:09 ` [PATCH 7/7] xfs: only run COW extent recovery when there are no live extents Darrick J. Wong
2021-12-16  4:41   ` Dave Chinner
2021-12-24  7:18   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211217185933.GJ27664@magnolia \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox