From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: hide the XFS_IOC_{ALLOC,FREE}SP* definitions
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 11:59:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220110195905.GZ656707@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ea019905-ebbe-9082-0399-7ea0e6be553c@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 12:39:59PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 1/10/22 11:51 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> >
> > Now that we've made these ioctls defunct, move them from xfs_fs.h to
> > xfs_ioctl.c, which effectively removes them from the publicly supported
> > ioctl interfaces for XFS.
>
> You pointed out on IRC that you need to hide the 32-bit/compat ones too,
> so I'll wait for a V2 on that? (XFS_IOC_ALLOCSP_32 & friends).
Will send.
--D
> But the approach seems fine.
>
> Thanks,
> -Eric
>
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h | 8 ++++----
> > fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 9 +++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h
> > index c43877c8a279..49c0e583d6bb 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h
> > @@ -781,13 +781,13 @@ struct xfs_scrub_metadata {
> > * For 'documentation' purposed more than anything else,
> > * the "cmd #" field reflects the IRIX fcntl number.
> > */
> > -#define XFS_IOC_ALLOCSP _IOW ('X', 10, struct xfs_flock64)
> > -#define XFS_IOC_FREESP _IOW ('X', 11, struct xfs_flock64)
> > +/* XFS_IOC_ALLOCSP ------- deprecated 10 */
> > +/* XFS_IOC_FREESP -------- deprecated 11 */
> > #define XFS_IOC_DIOINFO _IOR ('X', 30, struct dioattr)
> > #define XFS_IOC_FSGETXATTR FS_IOC_FSGETXATTR
> > #define XFS_IOC_FSSETXATTR FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR
> > -#define XFS_IOC_ALLOCSP64 _IOW ('X', 36, struct xfs_flock64)
> > -#define XFS_IOC_FREESP64 _IOW ('X', 37, struct xfs_flock64)
> > +/* XFS_IOC_ALLOCSP64 ----- deprecated 36 */
> > +/* XFS_IOC_FREESP64 ------ deprecated 37 */
> > #define XFS_IOC_GETBMAP _IOWR('X', 38, struct getbmap)
> > #define XFS_IOC_FSSETDM _IOW ('X', 39, struct fsdmidata)
> > #define XFS_IOC_RESVSP _IOW ('X', 40, struct xfs_flock64)
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> > index 38b2a1e881a6..15ec3d4a1516 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> > @@ -1854,6 +1854,15 @@ xfs_fs_eofblocks_from_user(
> > return 0;
> > }
> > +/*
> > + * These long-unused ioctls were removed from the official ioctl API in 5.17,
> > + * but retain these definitions so that we can log warnings about them.
> > + */
> > +#define XFS_IOC_ALLOCSP _IOW ('X', 10, struct xfs_flock64)
> > +#define XFS_IOC_FREESP _IOW ('X', 11, struct xfs_flock64)
> > +#define XFS_IOC_ALLOCSP64 _IOW ('X', 36, struct xfs_flock64)
> > +#define XFS_IOC_FREESP64 _IOW ('X', 37, struct xfs_flock64)
> > +
> > /*
> > * Note: some of the ioctl's return positive numbers as a
> > * byte count indicating success, such as readlink_by_handle.
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-10 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-10 17:48 [PATCH 1/2] xfs: kill the XFS_IOC_{ALLOC,FREE}SP* ioctls Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-10 17:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: hide the XFS_IOC_{ALLOC,FREE}SP* definitions Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-10 18:39 ` Eric Sandeen
2022-01-10 19:59 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2022-01-10 19:58 ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-10 21:10 ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-11 16:24 ` Eric Sandeen
2022-01-10 18:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: kill the XFS_IOC_{ALLOC,FREE}SP* ioctls Eric Sandeen
2022-01-10 21:08 ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-18 2:26 ` [xfs] 270a6968dc: xfstests.xfs.009.fail kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220110195905.GZ656707@magnolia \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=esandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox