public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] xfs: factor and move some code in xfs_log_cil.c
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 20:15:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220427031530.GE17025@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220427022259.695399-6-david@fromorbit.com>

On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 12:22:56PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> In preparation for adding support for intent item whiteouts.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

Looks like a straight hoist?
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c
> index e5ab62f08c19..0d8d092447ad 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,38 @@ xlog_cil_ticket_alloc(
>  	return tic;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Check if the current log item was first committed in this sequence.
> + * We can't rely on just the log item being in the CIL, we have to check
> + * the recorded commit sequence number.
> + *
> + * Note: for this to be used in a non-racy manner, it has to be called with
> + * CIL flushing locked out. As a result, it should only be used during the
> + * transaction commit process when deciding what to format into the item.
> + */
> +static bool
> +xlog_item_in_current_chkpt(
> +	struct xfs_cil		*cil,
> +	struct xfs_log_item	*lip)
> +{
> +	if (list_empty(&lip->li_cil))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * li_seq is written on the first commit of a log item to record the
> +	 * first checkpoint it is written to. Hence if it is different to the
> +	 * current sequence, we're in a new checkpoint.
> +	 */
> +	return lip->li_seq == READ_ONCE(cil->xc_current_sequence);
> +}
> +
> +bool
> +xfs_log_item_in_current_chkpt(
> +	struct xfs_log_item *lip)
> +{
> +	return xlog_item_in_current_chkpt(lip->li_log->l_cilp, lip);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Unavoidable forward declaration - xlog_cil_push_work() calls
>   * xlog_cil_ctx_alloc() itself.
> @@ -934,6 +966,40 @@ xlog_cil_build_trans_hdr(
>  	tic->t_curr_res -= lvhdr->lv_bytes;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Pull all the log vectors off the items in the CIL, and remove the items from
> + * the CIL. We don't need the CIL lock here because it's only needed on the
> + * transaction commit side which is currently locked out by the flush lock.
> + */
> +static void
> +xlog_cil_build_lv_chain(
> +	struct xfs_cil		*cil,
> +	struct xfs_cil_ctx	*ctx,
> +	uint32_t		*num_iovecs,
> +	uint32_t		*num_bytes)
> +{
> +	struct xfs_log_vec	*lv = NULL;
> +
> +	while (!list_empty(&cil->xc_cil)) {
> +		struct xfs_log_item	*item;
> +
> +		item = list_first_entry(&cil->xc_cil,
> +					struct xfs_log_item, li_cil);
> +		list_del_init(&item->li_cil);
> +		if (!ctx->lv_chain)
> +			ctx->lv_chain = item->li_lv;
> +		else
> +			lv->lv_next = item->li_lv;
> +		lv = item->li_lv;
> +		item->li_lv = NULL;
> +		*num_iovecs += lv->lv_niovecs;
> +
> +		/* we don't write ordered log vectors */
> +		if (lv->lv_buf_len != XFS_LOG_VEC_ORDERED)
> +			*num_bytes += lv->lv_bytes;
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Push the Committed Item List to the log.
>   *
> @@ -956,7 +1022,6 @@ xlog_cil_push_work(
>  		container_of(work, struct xfs_cil_ctx, push_work);
>  	struct xfs_cil		*cil = ctx->cil;
>  	struct xlog		*log = cil->xc_log;
> -	struct xfs_log_vec	*lv;
>  	struct xfs_cil_ctx	*new_ctx;
>  	int			num_iovecs = 0;
>  	int			num_bytes = 0;
> @@ -1033,31 +1098,7 @@ xlog_cil_push_work(
>  	list_add(&ctx->committing, &cil->xc_committing);
>  	spin_unlock(&cil->xc_push_lock);
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Pull all the log vectors off the items in the CIL, and remove the
> -	 * items from the CIL. We don't need the CIL lock here because it's only
> -	 * needed on the transaction commit side which is currently locked out
> -	 * by the flush lock.
> -	 */
> -	lv = NULL;
> -	while (!list_empty(&cil->xc_cil)) {
> -		struct xfs_log_item	*item;
> -
> -		item = list_first_entry(&cil->xc_cil,
> -					struct xfs_log_item, li_cil);
> -		list_del_init(&item->li_cil);
> -		if (!ctx->lv_chain)
> -			ctx->lv_chain = item->li_lv;
> -		else
> -			lv->lv_next = item->li_lv;
> -		lv = item->li_lv;
> -		item->li_lv = NULL;
> -		num_iovecs += lv->lv_niovecs;
> -
> -		/* we don't write ordered log vectors */
> -		if (lv->lv_buf_len != XFS_LOG_VEC_ORDERED)
> -			num_bytes += lv->lv_bytes;
> -	}
> +	xlog_cil_build_lv_chain(cil, ctx, &num_iovecs, &num_bytes);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Switch the contexts so we can drop the context lock and move out
> @@ -1508,32 +1549,6 @@ xlog_cil_force_seq(
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * Check if the current log item was first committed in this sequence.
> - * We can't rely on just the log item being in the CIL, we have to check
> - * the recorded commit sequence number.
> - *
> - * Note: for this to be used in a non-racy manner, it has to be called with
> - * CIL flushing locked out. As a result, it should only be used during the
> - * transaction commit process when deciding what to format into the item.
> - */
> -bool
> -xfs_log_item_in_current_chkpt(
> -	struct xfs_log_item	*lip)
> -{
> -	struct xfs_cil		*cil = lip->li_log->l_cilp;
> -
> -	if (list_empty(&lip->li_cil))
> -		return false;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * li_seq is written on the first commit of a log item to record the
> -	 * first checkpoint it is written to. Hence if it is different to the
> -	 * current sequence, we're in a new checkpoint.
> -	 */
> -	return lip->li_seq == READ_ONCE(cil->xc_current_sequence);
> -}
> -
>  /*
>   * Perform initial CIL structure initialisation.
>   */
> -- 
> 2.35.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-27  3:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-27  2:22 [PATCH 0/8 v5] xfs: intent whiteouts Dave Chinner
2022-04-27  2:22 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfs: hide log iovec alignment constraints Dave Chinner
2022-04-27  3:14   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-27  4:50     ` Dave Chinner
2022-04-27 16:45       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-28 13:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27  2:22 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: don't commit the first deferred transaction without intents Dave Chinner
2022-04-27  3:03   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-27  4:52     ` Dave Chinner
2022-04-28 13:02   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-30 17:02   ` Alli
2022-04-27  2:22 ` [PATCH 3/8] xfs: add log item flags to indicate intents Dave Chinner
2022-04-27  3:04   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-28 13:04     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27  2:22 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfs: tag transactions that contain intent done items Dave Chinner
2022-04-27  3:06   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-28 13:05   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27  2:22 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs: factor and move some code in xfs_log_cil.c Dave Chinner
2022-04-27  3:15   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2022-04-27  4:56     ` Dave Chinner
2022-04-28 13:06   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29  1:56   ` Alli
2022-04-27  2:22 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs: add log item method to return related intents Dave Chinner
2022-04-27  3:18   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-28 13:10   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27  2:22 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs: whiteouts release intents that are not in the AIL Dave Chinner
2022-04-27  3:19   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-28 13:15   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27  2:22 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs: intent item whiteouts Dave Chinner
2022-04-27  3:32   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-27  5:47     ` Dave Chinner
2022-04-27 17:31       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-27 22:05         ` Dave Chinner
2022-04-28 13:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-28 21:38     ` Dave Chinner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-03-14 22:06 [PATCH 0/8 v3] xfs: intent whiteouts Dave Chinner
2022-03-14 22:06 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs: factor and move some code in xfs_log_cil.c Dave Chinner
2022-04-11  5:24   ` Alli
2022-04-12 10:25     ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220427031530.GE17025@magnolia \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox