From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] xfs: factor and move some code in xfs_log_cil.c
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 20:15:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220427031530.GE17025@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220427022259.695399-6-david@fromorbit.com>
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 12:22:56PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> In preparation for adding support for intent item whiteouts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Looks like a straight hoist?
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c
> index e5ab62f08c19..0d8d092447ad 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,38 @@ xlog_cil_ticket_alloc(
> return tic;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Check if the current log item was first committed in this sequence.
> + * We can't rely on just the log item being in the CIL, we have to check
> + * the recorded commit sequence number.
> + *
> + * Note: for this to be used in a non-racy manner, it has to be called with
> + * CIL flushing locked out. As a result, it should only be used during the
> + * transaction commit process when deciding what to format into the item.
> + */
> +static bool
> +xlog_item_in_current_chkpt(
> + struct xfs_cil *cil,
> + struct xfs_log_item *lip)
> +{
> + if (list_empty(&lip->li_cil))
> + return false;
> +
> + /*
> + * li_seq is written on the first commit of a log item to record the
> + * first checkpoint it is written to. Hence if it is different to the
> + * current sequence, we're in a new checkpoint.
> + */
> + return lip->li_seq == READ_ONCE(cil->xc_current_sequence);
> +}
> +
> +bool
> +xfs_log_item_in_current_chkpt(
> + struct xfs_log_item *lip)
> +{
> + return xlog_item_in_current_chkpt(lip->li_log->l_cilp, lip);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Unavoidable forward declaration - xlog_cil_push_work() calls
> * xlog_cil_ctx_alloc() itself.
> @@ -934,6 +966,40 @@ xlog_cil_build_trans_hdr(
> tic->t_curr_res -= lvhdr->lv_bytes;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Pull all the log vectors off the items in the CIL, and remove the items from
> + * the CIL. We don't need the CIL lock here because it's only needed on the
> + * transaction commit side which is currently locked out by the flush lock.
> + */
> +static void
> +xlog_cil_build_lv_chain(
> + struct xfs_cil *cil,
> + struct xfs_cil_ctx *ctx,
> + uint32_t *num_iovecs,
> + uint32_t *num_bytes)
> +{
> + struct xfs_log_vec *lv = NULL;
> +
> + while (!list_empty(&cil->xc_cil)) {
> + struct xfs_log_item *item;
> +
> + item = list_first_entry(&cil->xc_cil,
> + struct xfs_log_item, li_cil);
> + list_del_init(&item->li_cil);
> + if (!ctx->lv_chain)
> + ctx->lv_chain = item->li_lv;
> + else
> + lv->lv_next = item->li_lv;
> + lv = item->li_lv;
> + item->li_lv = NULL;
> + *num_iovecs += lv->lv_niovecs;
> +
> + /* we don't write ordered log vectors */
> + if (lv->lv_buf_len != XFS_LOG_VEC_ORDERED)
> + *num_bytes += lv->lv_bytes;
> + }
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Push the Committed Item List to the log.
> *
> @@ -956,7 +1022,6 @@ xlog_cil_push_work(
> container_of(work, struct xfs_cil_ctx, push_work);
> struct xfs_cil *cil = ctx->cil;
> struct xlog *log = cil->xc_log;
> - struct xfs_log_vec *lv;
> struct xfs_cil_ctx *new_ctx;
> int num_iovecs = 0;
> int num_bytes = 0;
> @@ -1033,31 +1098,7 @@ xlog_cil_push_work(
> list_add(&ctx->committing, &cil->xc_committing);
> spin_unlock(&cil->xc_push_lock);
>
> - /*
> - * Pull all the log vectors off the items in the CIL, and remove the
> - * items from the CIL. We don't need the CIL lock here because it's only
> - * needed on the transaction commit side which is currently locked out
> - * by the flush lock.
> - */
> - lv = NULL;
> - while (!list_empty(&cil->xc_cil)) {
> - struct xfs_log_item *item;
> -
> - item = list_first_entry(&cil->xc_cil,
> - struct xfs_log_item, li_cil);
> - list_del_init(&item->li_cil);
> - if (!ctx->lv_chain)
> - ctx->lv_chain = item->li_lv;
> - else
> - lv->lv_next = item->li_lv;
> - lv = item->li_lv;
> - item->li_lv = NULL;
> - num_iovecs += lv->lv_niovecs;
> -
> - /* we don't write ordered log vectors */
> - if (lv->lv_buf_len != XFS_LOG_VEC_ORDERED)
> - num_bytes += lv->lv_bytes;
> - }
> + xlog_cil_build_lv_chain(cil, ctx, &num_iovecs, &num_bytes);
>
> /*
> * Switch the contexts so we can drop the context lock and move out
> @@ -1508,32 +1549,6 @@ xlog_cil_force_seq(
> return 0;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * Check if the current log item was first committed in this sequence.
> - * We can't rely on just the log item being in the CIL, we have to check
> - * the recorded commit sequence number.
> - *
> - * Note: for this to be used in a non-racy manner, it has to be called with
> - * CIL flushing locked out. As a result, it should only be used during the
> - * transaction commit process when deciding what to format into the item.
> - */
> -bool
> -xfs_log_item_in_current_chkpt(
> - struct xfs_log_item *lip)
> -{
> - struct xfs_cil *cil = lip->li_log->l_cilp;
> -
> - if (list_empty(&lip->li_cil))
> - return false;
> -
> - /*
> - * li_seq is written on the first commit of a log item to record the
> - * first checkpoint it is written to. Hence if it is different to the
> - * current sequence, we're in a new checkpoint.
> - */
> - return lip->li_seq == READ_ONCE(cil->xc_current_sequence);
> -}
> -
> /*
> * Perform initial CIL structure initialisation.
> */
> --
> 2.35.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-27 3:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-27 2:22 [PATCH 0/8 v5] xfs: intent whiteouts Dave Chinner
2022-04-27 2:22 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfs: hide log iovec alignment constraints Dave Chinner
2022-04-27 3:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-27 4:50 ` Dave Chinner
2022-04-27 16:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-28 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27 2:22 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: don't commit the first deferred transaction without intents Dave Chinner
2022-04-27 3:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-27 4:52 ` Dave Chinner
2022-04-28 13:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-30 17:02 ` Alli
2022-04-27 2:22 ` [PATCH 3/8] xfs: add log item flags to indicate intents Dave Chinner
2022-04-27 3:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-28 13:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27 2:22 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfs: tag transactions that contain intent done items Dave Chinner
2022-04-27 3:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-28 13:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27 2:22 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs: factor and move some code in xfs_log_cil.c Dave Chinner
2022-04-27 3:15 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2022-04-27 4:56 ` Dave Chinner
2022-04-28 13:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29 1:56 ` Alli
2022-04-27 2:22 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs: add log item method to return related intents Dave Chinner
2022-04-27 3:18 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-28 13:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27 2:22 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs: whiteouts release intents that are not in the AIL Dave Chinner
2022-04-27 3:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-28 13:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27 2:22 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs: intent item whiteouts Dave Chinner
2022-04-27 3:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-27 5:47 ` Dave Chinner
2022-04-27 17:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-27 22:05 ` Dave Chinner
2022-04-28 13:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-28 21:38 ` Dave Chinner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-03-14 22:06 [PATCH 0/8 v3] xfs: intent whiteouts Dave Chinner
2022-03-14 22:06 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs: factor and move some code in xfs_log_cil.c Dave Chinner
2022-04-11 5:24 ` Alli
2022-04-12 10:25 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220427031530.GE17025@magnolia \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox