From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] xfs: hide log iovec alignment constraints
Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 09:07:58 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220503230758.GC1098723@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220503224529.GD8265@magnolia>
On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 03:45:29PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 08:17:21AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> >
> > Callers currently have to round out the size of buffers to match the
> > aligment constraints of log iovecs and xlog_write(). They should not
> > need to know this detail, so introduce a new function to calculate
> > the iovec length (for use in ->iop_size implementations). Also
> > modify xlog_finish_iovec() to round up the length to the correct
> > alignment so the callers don't need to do this, either.
> >
> > Convert the only user - inode forks - of this alignment rounding to
> > use the new interface.
....
> > static inline void
> > -xlog_finish_iovec(struct xfs_log_vec *lv, struct xfs_log_iovec *vec, int len)
> > +xlog_finish_iovec(struct xfs_log_vec *lv, struct xfs_log_iovec *vec,
> > + int data_len)
> > {
> > struct xlog_op_header *oph = vec->i_addr;
> > -
> > - /* opheader tracks payload length, logvec tracks region length */
> > + int len;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Always round up the length to the correct alignment so callers don't
> > + * need to know anything about this log vec layout requirement. This
> > + * means we have to zero the area the data to be written does not cover.
> > + * This is complicated by fact the payload region is offset into the
> > + * logvec region by the opheader that tracks the payload.
> > + */
> > + len = xlog_calc_iovec_len(data_len);
> > + if (len - data_len != 0) {
> > + char *buf = vec->i_addr + sizeof(struct xlog_op_header);
> > +
> > + memset(buf + data_len, 0, len - data_len);
>
> Assuming this is the replacement for the kzalloc/kzrealloc calls above
> so that we don't write junk to disk,
Yes, exactly that.
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Thanks!
-Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-03 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-03 22:17 [PATCH 00/10 v6] xfs: intent whiteouts Dave Chinner
2022-05-03 22:17 ` [PATCH 01/10] xfs: zero inode fork buffer at allocation Dave Chinner
2022-05-03 22:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-03 22:42 ` Alli
2022-05-10 12:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-03 22:17 ` [PATCH 02/10] xfs: fix potential log item leak Dave Chinner
2022-05-03 22:42 ` Alli
2022-05-03 22:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-10 12:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-03 22:17 ` [PATCH 03/10] xfs: hide log iovec alignment constraints Dave Chinner
2022-05-03 22:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-03 23:07 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2022-05-03 22:17 ` [PATCH 04/10] xfs: don't commit the first deferred transaction without intents Dave Chinner
2022-05-03 22:17 ` [PATCH 05/10] xfs: add log item flags to indicate intents Dave Chinner
2022-05-03 22:17 ` [PATCH 06/10] xfs: tag transactions that contain intent done items Dave Chinner
2022-05-03 22:17 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfs: factor and move some code in xfs_log_cil.c Dave Chinner
2022-05-03 22:17 ` [PATCH 08/10] xfs: add log item method to return related intents Dave Chinner
2022-05-03 22:17 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs: whiteouts release intents that are not in the AIL Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 12:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-03 22:17 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfs: intent item whiteouts Dave Chinner
2022-05-03 22:42 ` Alli
2022-05-03 22:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-04 1:49 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220503230758.GC1098723@dread.disaster.area \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox